Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dbj Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$3.9MArts & Culture$2.5MHealth$1.7MFood & Nutrition$450kEmployment$335kEnvironment$315kYouth Development$140kHuman Services$130kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k11 grants · $210k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $300k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.5M
$25,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EITELJORG MUSEUM$1,000,000
NORTH POINT EDUCATIONAL SERVICE CENTER$500,000
CLEVELAND RAPE CRISIS CENTER$100,000
CLEVELAND SIGHT CENTER$75,000
CLEVELAND FOOD BANK$75,000
THE POINT FOUNDATION$50,000
PROJECT ANGEL FOOD$25,000
UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF GREATER CLEVELA$25,000
INDIANA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$25,000
ATTICA CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL CORPORATION$20,000
BOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE$20,000
LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF CLEVELAND$20,000
PROJECT OPEN HAND$20,000
THE CITY MISSIONLAURA'S HOME$15,000
THE GATHERING PLACE$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $425k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CLEVELAND SIGHT CENTER: $75k → 17%CLEVELAND SIGHT CENTER: $50k → 17%CLEVELAND SIGHT CENTER: $50k → 17%CLEVELAND SIGHT CENTER: $50k → 17%CLEVELAND SIGHT CENTER: $50k → 17%CLEVELAND SIGHT CENTER: $50k → 17%CLEVELAND SIGHT CENTER: $50k → 17%CLEVELAND SIGHT CENTER: $50k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
IN
OH
CA
MO
NM
OK
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.6M · 26 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against -19% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
3

Total granted

$9.6M
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
-19%

Still filing today

77%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentEmploymentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EM
    EITELJORG MUSEUM OF AMERICAN INDIANS AND WESTERN ART INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +24%
  • EC
    ENVISION CHILDREN
    4× · 2017–2021 · $1.4M · revenue +1% · 65% of their budget
  • TS
    THE SANTA FE OPERA
    4× · 2020–2023 · $1.1M · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • JA
    JACOBS AQUATIC CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • CM
    CITY MISSION
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • ND
    NOTRE DAME COLLEGE
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -19%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
2
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
3
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
6
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
7
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
8
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
9
National Association for College Admission Counseling

Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.

Education
10
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
11
Opportunity Partners

Mission: together we advance the quality of life for people with disabilities. vision: people of all abilities thrive in the world. values: impact- generate solutions that make a difference. choice - create opportunities for people to lead…

Employment
12
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cleveland Society for the Blind; the most unlike its peers is Eiteljorg Museum of American Indians and Western Art Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EITELJORG MUSEUM OF AMERICAN INDIANS AND WESTERN ART INC: $1,500,000 · Arts & CultureEITELJORG MUSEUM OF AMERICAN …THE SANTA FE OPERA: $1,050,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SANTA FE OPERAENVISION CHILDREN: $1,450,000 · Youth DevelopmentENVISION CHILDREN+1 more: $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentNORTH POINT EDUCATIONAL SERVICE CENTER: $1,000,000 · OtherNORTH POINT EDUCATIONAL SERV…UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF GREATER CL: $120,000 · OtherBOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE: $100,000 · OtherGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $325,000 · OtherGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK …SHAKER LAKES REGIONAL NATURE CENTER DBA NATURE CENTER AT SHAKER LAKES: $315,000 · OtherSHAKER LAKES REGIONAL NATURE…CORNUCOPIA INC: $200,000 · OtherCORNUCOPIA INCVOCATIONAL GUIDANCE SERVICES: $85,000 · Other+8 more: $240,000 · Other+8 moreGLSEN INC: $1,000,000 · Civil RightsGLSEN INCTREVOR PROJECT INC: $60,000 · Civil RightsTREVOR PROJE…WELLBEING ACTION FOR YOUTH INC: $415,000 · EducationWELLBEING A…POINT FOUNDATION: $250,000 · EducationPOINT FOUND…Indiana University Foundation: $190,000 · EducationIndiana Uni…HAND IN HAND PARENTING: $110,000 · EducationHAND IN HAN…+1 more: $10,000 · EducationCLEVELAND RAPE CRISIS CENTER: $650,000 · HealthPROJECT ANGEL FOOD: $65,000 · HealthUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY ASSOCIATION OF GREATER CLEVELAND INC: $45,000 · HealthCLEVELAND SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND: $425,000 · Human Services
Arts & Culture$2,550,000Youth Development$1,490,000Other$2,385,000Civil Rights$1,060,000Education$975,000Health$760,000Human Services$425,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEITELJORG MUSEUM OF AMERICAN INDIANS AND WESTERN ART INC: $1,500,000 over 7y, 20% of budgetENVISION CHILDREN: $1,450,000 over 4y, 65% of budgetTHE SANTA FE OPERA: $1,050,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetGLSEN INC: $1,000,000 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetCLEVELAND RAPE CRISIS CENTER: $650,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetCLEVELAND SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND: $425,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetWELLBEING ACTION FOR YOUTH INC: $415,000 over 2y, 37% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $325,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSHAKER LAKES REGIONAL NATURE CENTER DBA NATURE CENTER AT SHAKER LAKES: $315,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetPOINT FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetCORNUCOPIA INC: $200,000 over 8y, 18% of budgetIndiana University Foundation: $190,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHAND IN HAND PARENTING: $110,000 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetVOCATIONAL GUIDANCE SERVICES: $85,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetPROJECT ANGEL FOOD: $65,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetProject Open Hand: $60,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY ASSOCIATION OF GREATER CLEVELAND INC: $45,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetOPEN DOORS INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetLEGAL AID SOCIETY OF CLEVELAND: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNOTRE DAME COLLEGE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EITELJORG MUSEUM OF AMERICAN INDIANS AND WESTERN ART INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVISION CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds THE SANTA FE OPERA ↗
  • Who funds GLSEN INC ↗
  • Who funds CLEVELAND RAPE CRISIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CLEVELAND SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds WELLBEING ACTION FOR YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds SHAKER LAKES REGIONAL NATURE CENTER DBA NATURE CENTER AT SHAKER LAKES ↗
  • Who funds POINT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CORNUCOPIA INC ↗
  • Who funds Indiana University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HAND IN HAND PARENTING ↗
  • Who funds VOCATIONAL GUIDANCE SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT ANGEL FOOD ↗
  • Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Project Open Hand ↗
  • Who funds UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY ASSOCIATION OF GREATER CLEVELAND INC ↗
  • Who funds OPEN DOORS INC ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF CLEVELAND ↗
  • Who funds NOTRE DAME COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cleveland FoundationOH17.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · United Way of Greater Cleveland · The Reinberger Foundation · The Lozick Family Foundation · The Swagelok Foundation · George Codrington Fdnhirtlena · The Helen F & Louis Stolier Family Foundation · John P Murphy Foundation · Higley Fund of the Cleveland Foundation · Robert H Reakirt Fdn Equities · Jewish Federation of Cleveland · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dbj Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dbj Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dbj’s filings →

    More from the funding graph