Skip to content

· Private foundation

Day Family Foundation V17831005

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$20k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Youth Development$20kAnimals$14kHuman Services$11kEducation$11kPhilanthropy$10kFood & Nutrition$8kHousing & Shelter$7kHealth$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$398k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$2,618
CORPORATE CHAPLAINS OF AMERICA$2,500
HVAF OF INDIANA$2,500
PEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE NETWORK$2,500
THE ERICKSON CENTER FOR THE ARTS$2,500
ST MARY'S EARLY CHILDHOOD$2,500
PEACE RIVER WILDLIFE CENTER$2,000
HOPE FAMILY CARE INC$1,500
INDIANA SADDLE HORSE ASSOCIATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 78% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOPE FAMILY CARE INC: $3k → 20%PEACE RIVER WILDLIFE CENTER: $2k → 9%THE ERICKSON CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $3k → 14%CORPORATE CHAPLAINS OF AMERICA: $3k → 8%TRINITY FREE CLINIC: $2k → 5%INDIANA SADDLE HORSE ASSOCIATION: $3k → 14%ST MARY'S EARLY CHILDHOOD: $4k → 16%SHEDD AQUARIUM: $3k → 14%HOPE FAMILY CARE INC: $3k → 20%CHAPLAINS AT WORK: $2k → 8%TRINITY FREE CLINIC: $2k → 5%INDIANA SADDLE HORSE ASSOCIATION: $2k → 14%ST MARY'S EARLY CHILDHOOD: $3k → 16%SHEDD AQUARIUM: $3k → 14%HOPE FAMILY CARE INC: $3k → 20%HUMANE SOCIETY: $1k → 5%INDIANA SADDLE HORSE ASSOCIATION: $2k → 14%ST MARY'S EARLY CHILDHOOD: $3k → 16%HOPE FAMILY CARE INC: $2k → 20%JANUS DEVELOPMENT: $5k → 5%INDIANA SADDLE HORSE ASSOCIATION: $1k → 14%ST MARY'S EARLY CHILDHOOD: $2k → 16%HOPE FAMILY CARE INC: $1k → 20%RAPHA ROAD: $3k → 5%INDIANA SADDLE HORSE ASSOCIATION: $1k → 14%RELAPSING POLYCHONDRITIS: $3k → 16%HOME FAMILY CARE INC: $1k → 20%PEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE NETWORK: $3k → 16%PEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE NETWORK: $3k → 16%PEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE NETWORK: $3k → 16%PEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE NETWORK: $3k → 16%HVAF OF INDIANA: $3k → 16%HVAF OF INDIANA: $3k → 16%HVAF OF INDIANA: $2k → 16%INDIANAPOLIS ZOO: $3k → 16%INDIANAPOLIS ZOO: $3k → 16%BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $1k → 16%BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $500 → 16%BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $400 → 16%BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $270 → 16%BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $264 → 16%BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $250 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$80k · 11 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
5

Total granted

$80k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+251%

Still filing today

64%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsPhilanthropyFood & NutritionEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    2× · 2020–2021 · $10k · revenue +62%
  • AB
    A BETTER WAY CO-OP INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $8k · revenue +120%
  • HO
    HVAF OF INDIANA INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $7k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • RR
    RAPHA ROAD INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +251%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lifewater Inc

Lifewater international is a non-profit christian water development organization dedicated to effectively serving vulnerable children and families by partnering with underserved communities to overcome water poverty.

Environment
2
Mercy Medical Corporation

We, mercy medical and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. in the tradition of the sisters of mercy, we are committed to continuing the…

—
3
Humane Society of Indianapolis

IndyHumane's mission is to improve animal welfare in central Indiana. We are committed to ending the cycle of pet overpopulation, providing affordable pet ownership, and ensuring the well-being, health and safely of all animals in our…

Animals
4
Mercy Life Inc

We, trinity health pace and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. mercy life is a member of trinity health pace and trinity health.

—
5
Trinity Woods Inc

To serve the trinity woods family in the spirit of christ.

Human Services
6
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
7
Mercy Health

As the sisters of mercy before us, we bring to life the healing ministry of jesus through our compassionate care and exceptional service.

Health
8
Portage Trail Care Center Inc

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

Health
9
Pittsburgh Mercy Health System Inc

We, pittsburgh mercy health system (pittsburgh mercy) and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. pittsburgh mercy is a member of trinity…

Health
10
United Church of Christ Homes Inc

In the spirit of christ's love, the ministry of united church of christ homes is to provide care and service to elders through acts of love and compassion.

Human Services
11
Holy Cross Hospital Inc

We, holy cross hospital and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. holy cross hospital is a member of trinity health.

Health
12
Christian Care Retirement Apartments Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hvaf of Indiana Inc; the most unlike its peers is The People Helping People Network Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST MARY'S EARLY CHILDHOOD: $10,500 · OtherST MARY'S EARLY CHILDHOODHOPE FAMILY CARE INC: $10,000 · OtherHOPE FAMILY CARE INCINDIANA SADDLE HORSE ASSOCIATION INC: $7,500 · OtherINDIANA SADDLE HORSE ASSOCIATION INCIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $2,684 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICAIndividual grant recipient: $2,618 · OtherTHE ERICKSON CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $2,500 · OtherRAPHA ROAD INC: $2,500 · OtherCORPORATE CHAPLAINS OF AMERICA INC: $2,500 · Other+3 more: $3,500 · Other+3 moreIndianapolis Zoological Society Inc: $5,500 · AnimalsIndianapolis Z…SHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY: $5,000 · AnimalsSHEDD AQUARIUM…PEACE RIVER WILDLIFE CENTER INC: $2,000 · AnimalsPEACE RIVER WI…The People Helping People Network Inc: $10,000 · PhilanthropyThe People …YOUNG LIFE: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFEA BETTER WAY CO-OP INC: $7,500 · Food & NutritionHVAF OF INDIANA INC: $7,000 · Housing & ShelterTRINITY FREE CLINIC INC: $4,000 · Health
Other$49,302Animals$12,500Philanthropy$10,000Youth Development$10,000Food & Nutrition$7,500Housing & Shelter$7,000Health$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe People Helping People Network Inc: $10,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetA BETTER WAY CO-OP INC: $7,500 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetHVAF OF INDIANA INC: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetIndianapolis Zoological Society Inc: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY FREE CLINIC INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRAPHA ROAD INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCORPORATE CHAPLAINS OF AMERICA INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEACE RIVER WILDLIFE CENTER INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The People Helping People Network Inc ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds A BETTER WAY CO-OP INC ↗
  • Who funds HVAF OF INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds Indianapolis Zoological Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds SHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY FREE CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds RAPHA ROAD INC ↗
  • Who funds CORPORATE CHAPLAINS OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds PEACE RIVER WILDLIFE CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation IncNY10.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Day Family Foundation V17831005 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Day Family Foundation V17831005. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Day Family Foundation V17831005?

    Find your warmest path to Day Family Foundation V17831005 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Day Family Foundation V17831005’s filings →

    More from the funding graph