Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Day Family Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$40k
Granted FY2020
22
Grants FY2020
5
States reached
$10k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

97% of Day Family Foundation’s FY2021 grant dollars went to The Community Foundation Of Greater Birmingham, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2021 names 5 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Day Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 15 organizations, $40k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

10
19
15
20
5
21

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192021.

Philanthropy$324kHuman Services$29kHealth$15kArts & Culture$14kReligion$9kEmployment$3kEducation$2kEnvironment$2kOther$0
02FY2020 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k21 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REJOICE AND HOPE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL$10,000
OPERA BIRMINGHAM$5,000
FREEDOM RAIN INC - THE LOVELADY CENTER$5,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER$3,334
CREATE BIRMINGHAM$2,500
FROST VALLEY YMCA$1,500
TRIUMPH SERVICE$1,500
FORESTBURGH FIRE HOUSE$1,000
GRACE HOUSE MINISTRIES$1,000
FAMILY CONNECTIONS$1,000
MCWANE SCIENCE CENTER$1,000
TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND$1,000
AMERICAN MUSEUM OF FLY FISHING$1,000
CATHEDRAL CHURCH OF THE ADVENT$1,000
SAVE BARNEGAT BAY$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–21, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FROST VALLEY YMCA: $2k → 16%FROST VALLEY YMCA: $2k → 16%FROST VALLEY YMCA: $2k → 16%REJOICE AND HOPE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 16%REJOICE AND HOPE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 16%TRIUMPH SERVICE: $2k → 16%GRACE HOUES MINISTRIES: $1k → 16%GRACE HOUSE MINISTRIES: $1k → 16%GRACE HOUSE MINISTRIES: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 30% of Day Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Day Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$42k · 13 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2020, 0 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
2

Total granted

$42k
$9k

Still filing today

54%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentReligionPhilanthropyHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FV
    FROST VALLEY YMCA
    3× · 2019–2021 · $5k · revenue +34%
  • GH
    GRACE HOUSE MINISTRIES INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $3k · revenue +237%
  • SAVE BARNEGAT BAY INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $2k · revenue +139%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SOCIETY OF MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $8k
  • MC
    MCWANE CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bainbridge Island Museum of Art

Bainbridge island museum of art (bima) inspires curiosity, wonder and understanding by connecting people with the contemporary art and craft of the puget sound region.

Arts & Culture
2
Chicago Maritime Museum

Operation of a nautical history museum.

3
Delaware Museum of Nature and Science Inc

The museum is an educational corporation formed to ignite a life-long passion for exploring, discovering, and valuing nature and science.

4
Columbia River Maritime Museum

We collect, preserve, display, and interpret the maritime history, culture and art of the columbia river, its tributaries, and the waters of the north pacific for the education and enjoyment of the public.

Arts & Culture
5
Cape Ann Museum Inc

To foster an appreciation of the quality and diversity of life on cape ann, past and present; to further the knowledge and enjoyment of cape ann history and art; to collect and preserve significant information and artifacts; and to…

Arts & Culture
6
Santa Barbara Maritime Museum

Creating excellent exhibits and educational experiences that celebrate the santa barbara channel and illuminate our rich connections with the sea.

Arts & Culture
7
The Whaling Museum Society Inc

The Museum engages the community in exploring the diversity of our whaling heritage and its impacts to enrich and inform our lives.

Arts & Culture
8
Fernbank Inc

Fernbank museum of natural history inspires a lifelong learning of natural history through immersive programming and unmatched experiences to encourage a greater appreciation of our planet and its inhabitants. fernbank is dedicated to…

Arts & Culture
9
Maritime & Seafood Industry Museum

To preserve and interpret the maritime history and heritage of biloxi and the mississippi gulf coast.

Arts & Culture
10
Southampton History Museum

The southampton history museum preserves and promotes the history and culture of southampton by engaging diverse audiences in our shared heritage.

11
Florence Griswold Museum Inc

The florence griswold museum seeks to promote a greater understanding of connecticut's contribution to american art and history through public exhibitions and educational programs.

Arts & Culture
12
Chesapeake Bay Maritime Museum Inc

The mission of the chesapeake bay maritime museum cbmm is to preserve and explore the history, environment, and people of the chesapeake bay. the vision of the chesapeake bay maritime museum is to be the premier see sched o

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham and the most unlike its peers is New Jersey Museum of Boating. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER BIRMINGHAM — $323,640 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER BIRMINGHAM+1 more — $2,500 · PhilanthropyTHE SOCIETY OF MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $8,333 · OtherTHE SOCIE…BIRMINGHAM MUSEUM OF ART — $5,000 · OtherBIRMINGHA…FREEDOM RAIN INC - THE LOVELADY CENTER — $5,000 · OtherFREEDOM R…MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $3,334 · OtherMEMORIAL …CATHEDRAL CHURCH OF THE ADVENT — $3,000 · OtherCATHEDRAL…TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $2,000 · OtherTRUST FOR…JUPITER ISLAND MEDICAL CENTER — $1,500 · Other+6 more — $5,200 · Other+6 moreRejoice and Hope Ministries International — $20,000 · Human ServicesFROST VALLEY YMCA — $4,500 · Human ServicesGRACE HOUSE MINISTRIES INC — $3,000 · Human ServicesTRIUMPH SERVICES INC — $1,500 · Human ServicesOPERA BIRMINGHAM INC — $5,000 · Arts & CultureTHE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF FLY FISHING INC — $3,000 · Arts & CultureMCWANE SCIENCE CENTER — $1,000 · Arts & CultureNew Jersey Museum of Boating — $500 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $300 · Arts & CultureSAVE BARNEGAT BAY INC — $2,000 · EnvironmentEpiscopal Preaching Foundation Inc — $1,000 · ReligionFAMILY CONNECTIONS INC — $1,000 · Health
Philanthropy$326,140Other$33,367Human Services$29,000Arts & Culture$9,800Environment$2,000Religion$1,000Health$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER BIRMINGHAM — $323,640 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetRejoice and Hope Ministries International — $20,000 over 2y, 29% of budgetOPERA BIRMINGHAM INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFROST VALLEY YMCA — $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGRACE HOUSE MINISTRIES INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF FLY FISHING INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCREATE BIRMINGHAM — $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSAVE BARNEGAT BAY INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTRIUMPH SERVICES INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEpiscopal Preaching Foundation Inc — $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY CONNECTIONS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMCWANE SCIENCE CENTER — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUPITER ISLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $300 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER BIRMINGHAM
  • Who funds Rejoice and Hope Ministries International
  • Who funds OPERA BIRMINGHAM INC
  • Who funds FROST VALLEY YMCA
  • Who funds GRACE HOUSE MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF FLY FISHING INC
  • Who funds CREATE BIRMINGHAM
  • Who funds SAVE BARNEGAT BAY INC
  • Who funds TRIUMPH SERVICES INC
  • Who funds Episcopal Preaching Foundation Inc
  • Who funds FAMILY CONNECTIONS INC
  • Who funds MCWANE SCIENCE CENTER
  • Who funds New Jersey Museum of Boating
  • Who funds JUPITER ISLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Protective Life FoundationAL17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Protective Life Foundation · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Susan Mott Webb Charitable Trust · Mike and Gillian Goodrich Foundation · The Hugh Kaul Foundation · Robert R Meyer Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Day Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 83%
  • Family Connections Inc83% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Day Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Day Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph