Skip to content

· Private foundation

Davis-Seely Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$48k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$33k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$252kHousing & Shelter$44kEducation$43kReligion$23kRecreation & Sports$2kHuman Services$1kPublic Benefit$750Health$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $33k
$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$610k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAN DIEGO SYMPHONY$33,000
VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY$5,000
ELIZABETH COALITION TO HOUSE THE HOMELESS$5,000
UNBROKEN SPIRIT$1,250
LEXINGTON CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
CATHEDRAL OF CHRIST THE KING$1,000
OPERATION GAME ON$625
TATES CREEK BASEBALL BOOSTERS$400
RANCHO SANTA FE LITTLE LEAGUE$398
CHURCH OF THE NATIVITY$350
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ELIZABETH COALITION TO HOUSE THE HOMELESS: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$351k · 8 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
7

Total granted

$351k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+77%

Still filing today

38%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationRecreation & SportsArts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SAN DIEGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $244k · revenue +38%
  • VU
    VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2017–2024 · $20k · revenue +50%
  • LA
    LIBRARY ASSOCIATION OF LA JOLLA
    6× · 2017–2023 · $7k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • SS
    SOLANA SANTE FE SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • SO
    SISTERS OF CHARITY OF ST ELIZABETH CONVENT OF ST ELIZABETH
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • SP
    SAINT PATRICKS CATHEDRAL LANDMARK FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Baltimore Symphony Orchestra Inc

The baltimore symphony orchestra's (bso) mission is to promote, organize, manage and maintain a symphony orchestra for the city of baltimore and the state of maryland and to hold, sponsor, and present musical concerts by the baltimore…

Arts & Culture
2
Usa Volleyball

Lead, serve, and grow all areas of the sport of volleyball - including beach, indoor, and sitting. foster and conduct area, regional, state, and national amateur instructional and competitive volleyball programs and to represent the…

Recreation & Sports
3
Austin Symphony Orchestra Society

Provide symphony concerts for the public and support the local musiccommunity

—
4
Aliso Viejo Little League Inc

To support the little league program in Aliso Viejo, California.

—
5
Sartell Athletic Club Inc

League player fees and tournament fees

Recreation & Sports
6
La Jolla Youth Baseball Association Inc

Organize and administer youth baseball league on public grounds.

Youth Development
7
Los Gatos Little League

Los Gatos Little League operates a chartered little league baseball program for youths aged 5-15 where the youths develop fundamental baseball skills while positively being reinforced with lessons in teamwork, respect & sportmanship, both…

Recreation & Sports
8
El Dorado Post 119 American Legion

War veterans organization

—
9
Mission Viejo Girls Softball

This organization is an instructional and recreational softball league serving girls from the ages of 5 - 16, in the vicinity of mission viejo, ca. the number of player/members benefitting from this organization is approximately 800

Recreation & Sports
10
Rancho Trabuco Girls Softball Association

Youth sports programs - this organization is an instructional and recreational softball league serving girls from the ages of 5 - 15, in the vicinity of rancho santa margarita, ca. the number of player/members benefitting from this…

Recreation & Sports
11
Urbana Country Club

To provide services and education to its members.

—
12
Little League Baseball Inc

Little League Baseball and Softball

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The San Diego Symphony Orchestra Association; the most unlike its peers is Elizabeth Coalition to House the Homeless Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE SAN DIEGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $243,850 · Arts & CultureTHE SAN DIEGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATIONELIZABETH COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $39,000 · OtherELIZABETH COALITION FOR THE…CHURCH OF THE NATIVITY: $20,350 · OtherCHURCH OF THE NATIVITYLEXINGTON CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $12,500 · OtherLEXINGTON CATHOLIC HIGH SCH…ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF LEXINGTON KY: $7,000 · OtherROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF L…+9 more: $9,758 · Other+9 moreVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · EducationLIBRARY ASSOCIATION OF LA JOLLA: $7,000 · EducationElizabeth Coalition to House the Homeless Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesUNBROKEN SPIRIT: $1,250 · Public BenefitOperation Game On: $625 · Recreation & SportsTATES CREEK BASEBALL BOOSTER CLUB INC: $400 · Recreation & SportsAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $500 · Health
Arts & Culture$243,850Other$88,608Education$27,000Human Services$5,000Public Benefit$1,250Recreation & Sports$1,025Health$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE SAN DIEGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $243,850 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $20,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLIBRARY ASSOCIATION OF LA JOLLA: $7,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetElizabeth Coalition to House the Homeless Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNBROKEN SPIRIT: $1,250 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOperation Game On: $625 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTATES CREEK BASEBALL BOOSTER CLUB INC: $400 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRancho Santa Fe California Little League: $398 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE SAN DIEGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LIBRARY ASSOCIATION OF LA JOLLA ↗
  • Who funds Elizabeth Coalition to House the Homeless Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNBROKEN SPIRIT ↗
  • Who funds Operation Game On ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION ↗
  • Who funds TATES CREEK BASEBALL BOOSTER CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds Rancho Santa Fe California Little League ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ayco Charitable FoundationNY12.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ayco Charitable Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Davis-Seely Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Davis-Seely Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Davis-Seely’s filings →

    More from the funding graph