Skip to content

· Private foundation

Davis Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$165k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$52k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$751kHealth$147kHuman Services$112kPublic Safety & Disaster$61kFood & Nutrition$55kReligion$19kRecreation & Sports$11kCommunity Improvement$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $82k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $52k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MATER DEI HIGH SCHOOL$52,000
SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$22,500
ALL SAINTS ACADEMY$19,580
CHAKOTA THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER$15,250
SUGAR CREEK FIRE DEPARTMENT$15,000
GREEN BEAN FOOD PANTRY$10,000
GERMANTOWN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT$5,060
COPING 4 LIFE$5,000
DISCOVERY LAB$5,000
CLINTON COUNTY SNACK PACK PROGRAM$5,000
CARITAS FAMILY SOLUTIONS$2,500
WESCLIN SCHOOL DISTRICT$2,000
AINAD SHRINERS$1,500
KARLA SMITH FOUNDATION$1,000
CLINTON COUNTY IL CEO NFP$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $112k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 13% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%CARITAS FAMILY SOLUTIONS: $3k → 16%CARITAS FAMILY SOLUTIONS: $3k → 16%CARITAS FAMILY SOLUTIONS: $3k → 16%CARITAS FAMILY SOLUTIONS: $3k → 16%CARITAS FAMILY SOLUTIONS: $3k → 16%CARITAS FAMILY SOLUTIONS: $3k → 16%CHAKOTA THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $30k → 8%CHAKOTA THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $20k → 8%CHAKOTA THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $15k → 8%CHAKOTA THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $15k → 8%CHAKOTA THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $14k → 8%CHAKOTA THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 13% of Davis Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 88% of the giving stays in IL; by stated purpose, 84%.

Davis Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 15 repeat orgs$89k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +82% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
10

Total granted

$1.1M
$77k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+82%
+3%

Still filing today

53%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CT
    Chakota Therapeutic Riding Center NFP
    6× · 2020–2025 · $97k · revenue +106% · 28% of their budget
  • SH
    SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN
    4× · 2022–2025 · $88k · revenue +82%
  • C4
    COPING 4 LIFE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $25k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • DI
    DO IT FOR THE KIDS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $24k
  • FB
    FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF ALHAMBRA
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
  • CC
    CENTRAL COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT #71
    one grant, 2021 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Seifert Carl B for Shriners Hosp
—
2
Illinois Children's Healthcare Foundation
Human Services
3
The Shriners' Hospital for Children

Shriners children's is committed to compassionate, high-quality care that improves children's lives, in a family-centered and collaborative environment. (continued on schedule o)

Health
4
Children's Hospital Association
Health
5
Syrian Shriners

Shriners offers men and their families an opportunity to meet new friends who have similar interests. there are 191 shrine temples, or chapters, located in the united states, canada, mexico and the republic of panama. informal shrine clubs…

Membership Benefit
6
Institute for Children's Mental Disorders
Philanthropy
7
Shriners International Hella Shriners

Support shriners hospitals for children

—
8
Shriners International

Fraternity with philanthropic mission of supporting shriners hopsital for children

—
9
Beja Shriners

Shriners hospital for children. all care and services are provided regardless of the families' ability to pay. acceptance is based solely on a child's medical needs. the hospital system operates as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization…

—
10
Kazim Shriners

Philanthropic fraternity, charitable fundraising to support shriners hospitals for children.

—
11
Childrens Hospital of Illinois Medical Group

To support the mission of osf healthcare system, a catholic integrated health care delivery system, through the provision of quality health care services related to comprehensive inpatient and outpatient care for children.

—
12
Christ's Hospital
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shriners Hospitals for Children; the most unlike its peers is Shriners Hospital for Children. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MATER DEI HIGH SCHOOL: $247,913 · OtherMATER DEI HIGH SCHOOLWESCLIN SCHOOL DISTRICT: $234,228 · OtherWESCLIN SCHOOL DISTRICTALL SAINTS ACADEMY: $231,070 · OtherALL SAINTS ACADEMYSUGAR CREEK FIRE DEPARTMENT: $56,000 · OtherSUGAR CREEK FIRE DEPARTMENT+18 more: $141,585 · Other+18 moreChakota Therapeutic Riding Center NFP: $97,218 · Human ServicesChakota Th…CHRISTIAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS: $15,000 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN …SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $87,500 · PhilanthropyCOPING 4 LIFE: $25,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $22,500 · HealthHIS KIDS INC: $5,000 · HealthKARLA SMITH FOUNDATION: $3,000 · HealthTULSA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$910,796Human Services$112,218Philanthropy$87,500Health$55,500Arts & Culture$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChakota Therapeutic Riding Center NFP: $97,218 over 6y, 28% of budgetCOPING 4 LIFE: $25,000 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $22,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS: $15,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTULSA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHIS KIDS INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $4,375 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAINAD SHRINERS: $3,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetKARLA SMITH FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Chakota Therapeutic Riding Center NFP ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds COPING 4 LIFE ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds TULSA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds HIS KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AINAD SHRINERS ↗
  • Who funds KARLA SMITH FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Davis Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Davis Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Davis Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Davis Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Davis’ filings →

More from the funding graph