· Private foundation
David S Baum Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k13 grants · $63k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $260k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER | $50,000 |
| YOUNG AMERICA'S FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| TURNING POINT USA | $35,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $27,900 |
| MMAC COMMUNITY SUPPORT FOUNDATION INC | $20,000 |
| DYSLEXIA CENTER OF AUSTIN | $20,000 |
| SAMARITAN'S PURSE | $20,000 |
| JUDICIAL WATCH | $20,000 |
| UNITED WAY BLACKHAWK REGION | $17,000 |
| HEALTHNET OF ROCK COUNTY | $10,000 |
| ROARING FORK CONSERVANCY | $10,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY FT MYERS AREA COMMAND | $10,000 |
| GIFTS MEN'S SHELTER | $10,000 |
| KIDS MEALS INC | $10,000 |
| AGRACE FOUNDATION (JANESVILLE HOSPICE) | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $136k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
41 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $76k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YAYoung America's Foundation4× · 2021–2024 · $205k · revenue +5%
- TPTURNING POINT USA INC4× · 2021–2024 · $135k · revenue +107%
- HOHEALTHNET OF ROCK COUNTY INC4× · 2021–2024 · $125k · revenue +30%
Funded once
- SASALVATION ARMYone grant, 2022 · $50k
- AEAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCHgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +40%
- TBTHE BLEXIT FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -91%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…
The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…
The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…
American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…
The r street institute is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, public-policy research organization ("think tank"). our mission is to engage in policy research and outreach to promote free markets and limited, effective government. (continued on…
Help improve policy and decision making through research and analysis.
Uatx is a nonprofit dedicated to building a liberal arts university committed to freedom of inquiry, freedom of conscience, and civil discourse. to maintain these principles, the university will be fiercely independent financially,…
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…
To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Freedom Watch Inc Center for Economic Justice. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Young America's Foundation ↗
- Who funds DAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER ↗
- Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTHNET OF ROCK COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DYSLEXIA CENTER OF AUSTIN ↗
- Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT VERITAS ↗
- Who funds ROARING FORK CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds GOD IS FAITHFUL TEMPORARY SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS' MEALS INC ↗
- Who funds DING DARLING WILDLIFE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds Memorial Park Conservancy Inc ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM WATCH INC CENTER FOR ECONOMIC JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FOSTER VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds KANDU INDUSTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds INVESTIGATIVE PROJECT ON TERRORISM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VALLEY VIEW HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc ↗
- Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds RELIGIOUS FREEDOM INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds MMAC COMMUNITY SUPPORT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE BLEXIT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE ARTS CAMPUS AT WILLITS ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY BLACKHAWK REGION INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTHENTITY ↗
- Who funds THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY FOR LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES ↗
- Who funds CITIZENS AGAINST GOVERNMENT WASTE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Donors Trust Inc · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Community Foundation of Southern Wisconsin Inc · Bradley Impact Fund Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Janesville Foundation Inc · Jpc Foundation · Ebs Foundation · Bailey Family Foundation Inc · Farrell Family Foundation · Aspen Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization David S Baum Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The United Way of Lee County Inc — 1% of income from government
- Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.