Skip to content

Wyoming · Private foundation

David Rodman Titcomb Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$118k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
23
Grants FY2024
17
Organizations funded FY2023
24%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$5,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$10,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 17
FY2021 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
6
Total assets, FY2024
$1.4M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 24% of the organizations David Rodman Titcomb Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 22% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23
Recreation & SportsAnimalsHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving22$114k27%
FY202317$90k24%
FY202215$70k93%
FY20211$15kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Animals$123kRecreation & Sports$55kHuman Services$30kHealth$28kArts & Culture$15kHousing & Shelter$15kPhilanthropy$14kInternational$9kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2021 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Animal Adoption Center Inc$45,00041%
Cascade Bicycle Club$15,00030%
Village Bicycle Project Inc$15,00036%
Beyond Fences Inc$15,00032%
Paws Chicago$15,00030%
Friends of Pathways$15,00031%
Physicians Committee for Responsible Med$15,00030%
Lander Cycling Club$15,0003n/a
Humane World for Animals International$15,00030%
Outdoors for all Foundation$10,00020%
Show all 16 grantees
All grantees of David Rodman Titcomb Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Animal Adoption Center Inc$45,00041%
Cascade Bicycle Club$15,00030%
Village Bicycle Project Inc$15,00036%
Beyond Fences Inc$15,00032%
Paws Chicago$15,00030%
Friends of Pathways$15,00031%
Physicians Committee for Responsible Med$15,00030%
Lander Cycling Club$15,0003n/a
Humane World for Animals International$15,00030%
Outdoors for all Foundation$10,00020%
Teton County Pet Partners$7,5002n/a
Animals' Angels Incorporated$5,00010%
World Bicycle Relief Nfp$5,00010%
Wind River Tribal Buffalo Initiative$5,00010%
Crowheart Community Center$5,0001n/a
Needs of Dubois Inc$501n/a

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 9 recipients with no EIN on record ($87k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget David Rodman Titcomb Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAnimal Adoption Center Inc: $45,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetCascade Bicycle Club: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetVillage Bicycle Project Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetBeyond Fences Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetPaws Chicago: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Pathways: $15,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetPhysicians Committee for Responsible Med: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals International: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOutdoors for all Foundation: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAnimals' Angels Incorporated: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWorld Bicycle Relief Nfp: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWind River Tribal Buffalo Initiative: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 12.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN7.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare David Rodman Titcomb Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to David Rodman Titcomb Foundation?

Find your warmest path to David Rodman Titcomb Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About David Rodman Titcomb Foundation

How much does David Rodman Titcomb Foundation give?
David Rodman Titcomb Foundation reported 23 grants totaling $118,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 17 organizations a year over FY2021 to FY2023.
What does David Rodman Titcomb Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2024, its largest causes are Animals (42%), Recreation & Sports (19%), Human Services (10%).
Who are David Rodman Titcomb Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2021 to FY2024: Animal Adoption Center Inc ($45k), Cascade Bicycle Club ($15k), Village Bicycle Project Inc ($15k).
Does David Rodman Titcomb Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 24% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does David Rodman Titcomb Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as David Rodman Titcomb Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc, Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program, Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc.
Where is David Rodman Titcomb Foundation based?
David Rodman Titcomb Foundation is based in WY.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on David Rodman Titcomb’s filings →

More from the funding graph