Skip to content

· Private foundation

David B Lichtenstein Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$724k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$2.3MEducation$881kYouth Development$756kHuman Services$521kArts & Culture$398kPhilanthropy$271kHealth$227kFood & Nutrition$99kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $51k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $245k
  • $250k+1 grant · $400k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST LOUIS ZOO$400,000
CCUA$125,000
VARIETY CHILDREN'S CHARITY$70,000
WOODHAVEN$50,000
BAPTIST STUDENT UNION$10,500
SALVATION ARMY$10,000
RANKEN JORDAN PEDIATRIC HOSP$10,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS$10,000
SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND$10,000
SCOUTING AMERICA$5,000
NURSES FOR NEWBORNS$5,000
WHITE CROSS FOOD PANTRY$5,000
CENTER FOR AUTISM EDUCATION$5,000
PINK RIBBON GOOD$2,000
SCHOOL OF SERVICE$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $255k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LEAST OF THESE: $2k → 8%DISABILITY RESOURCE ASSOCIATION: $15k → 9%SERVE INC: $5k → 11%LIVE 2 GIVE HOPE: $10k → 15%THE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $10k → 16%PONY BIRD INC: $5k → 9%SERVE INC: $5k → 11%THE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $6k → 16%HOME SWEET HOME: $3k → 11%OUR LADY'S INN: $25k → 11%OUR LADY'S INN: $15k → 11%HOME SWEET HOME: $15k → 11%HOME SWEET HOME: $5k → 11%HOME SWEET HOME: $3k → 11%FEED MY PEOPLE: $2k → 11%BAPTIST STUDENT UNION: $36k → 17%FEED MY PEOPLE: $2k → 11%BAPTIST STUDENT UNION: $31k → 17%BAPTIST STUDENT UNION: $25k → 17%BAPTIST STUDENT UNION: $11k → 17%HAVEN HOUSE: $5k → 11%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $10k → 11%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $5k → 11%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.3M · 26 repeat orgs$411k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
30

Total granted

$5.3M
$187k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+15%

Still filing today

54%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $224k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationHousing & ShelterArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MT
    MUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $273k · revenue +95%
  • OL
    OUR LADYS INN
    2× · 2021–2022 · $40k · revenue +45%
  • HS
    HOME SWEET HOME
    4× · 2019–2024 · $26k · revenue +395%

Funded once

  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITY
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
  • DR
    DISABILITY RESOURCE ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue -1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
2
Mary Ryder Home

To serve st. louis' most vulnerable senior women, nourishing their social, physical and emotional needs, and enhancing their quality of life through compassionate care.

Housing & Shelter
3
Family Self Help Center Inc

A sanctuary for survivors of domestic violence, sexual assault, and substance use disorders.

—
4
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
5
Magdala House

To provide outpatient and residential rehabilitative services to individuals and families referred by various government agencies. these individuals include substance abusers, intellectually disabled, developmentally disabled, and abused…

Health
6
New Hope Services Inc

Provide services in response to individual need

Human Services
7
Nashville Safe Haven Family Shelter Inc

Lead our community's efforts to house, support, empower and advocate for families experiencing homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
8
Care Net Center of Greater Orleans

Pregnancy counseling

Unclassified
9
Sts Joachim and Ann Care Service

To provide integrated services such as financial assistance, case management, and referrals to families and individuals of all ages to reduce the propensity for homelessness, abuse and neglect, and to provide the tools to achieve…

—
10
A Safe Place

Emergency shelter for victims of domestic violence.

—
11
Homeward Bound Inc

Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.

Human Services
12
Cultivate Kansas City Inc

Grow food, farms and community in support of a sustainable, healthy and local food system.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My People; the most unlike its peers is City of Columbia New Century Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
19/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST LOUIS ZOO: $2,268,000 · OtherST LOUIS ZOOVARIETY CHILDREN'S CHARITY: $975,500 · OtherVARIETY CHILDREN'S CHARITYUNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI: $853,503 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI+41 more: $713,893 · Other+41 moreMUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS: $273,250 · Arts & CultureCITY OF COLUMBIA NEW CENTURY FUND INC: $271,000 · PhilanthropyBAPTIST STUDENT UNION: $102,000 · Human ServicesOUR LADYS INN: $40,000 · Human ServicesHOME SWEET HOME: $25,500 · Human ServicesNURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $16,000 · Human ServicesDISABILITY RESOURCE ASSOCIATION INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesTHE WOMEN'S SAFE HOUSE: $10,000 · Human ServicesSERVE INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesLive 2 Give Hope: $10,000 · Human Services+4 more: $16,000 · Human ServicesFAITH THROUGH FIRE INC: $13,828 · HealthSchool of Service Access Arts: $12,000 · HealthSOCIETY FOR THE BLIND INC: $10,000 · HealthPINK RIBBON GOOD INC: $5,000 · HealthFIRST CHANCE FOR CHILDREN: $23,500 · EducationTHE CENTER FOR AUTISM EDUCATION: $5,000 · EducationMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES: $10,000 · Environment
Other$4,810,896Arts & Culture$273,250Philanthropy$271,000Human Services$264,500Health$40,828Education$28,500Environment$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS: $273,250 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetCITY OF COLUMBIA NEW CENTURY FUND INC: $271,000 over 5y, 75% of budgetBAPTIST STUDENT UNION: $102,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetOUR LADYS INN: $40,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHOME SWEET HOME: $25,500 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetFIRST CHANCE FOR CHILDREN: $23,500 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetNURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $20,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $16,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetDISABILITY RESOURCE ASSOCIATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFAITH THROUGH FIRE INC: $13,828 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetSchool of Service Access Arts: $12,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S SAFE HOUSE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSERVE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLive 2 Give Hope: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPARAQUAD INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FARMER'S HOUSE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPINK RIBBON GOOD INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHAVEN HOUSE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR AUTISM EDUCATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPONY BIRD INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALTERNATIVE COMMUNITY TRAINING INC (TAX): $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HAVEN OF GRACE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPOWELL GARDENS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFEED MY PEOPLE: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEART OF MISSOURI CASA: $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLEAST OF THESE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds CITY OF COLUMBIA NEW CENTURY FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds BAPTIST STUDENT UNION ↗
  • Who funds OUR LADYS INN ↗
  • Who funds HOME SWEET HOME ↗
  • Who funds FIRST CHANCE FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds NURSES FOR NEWBORNS ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds DISABILITY RESOURCE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FAITH THROUGH FIRE INC ↗
  • Who funds School of Service Access Arts ↗
  • Who funds THE WOMEN'S SAFE HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds SERVE INC ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds Live 2 Give Hope ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES ↗
  • Who funds PARAQUAD INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FARMER'S HOUSE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Veterans United FoundationMO23× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Veterans United Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Allen P and Josephine B Green · Edward Jones Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Pott Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation · The William R Orthwein Jr and Laura Rand Orthwein Foundation Inc · East Missouri Foundation · Brown Dana Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization David B Lichtenstein Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from David B Lichtenstein Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to David B Lichtenstein Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to David B Lichtenstein Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on David B Lichtenstein’s filings →

    More from the funding graph