Skip to content
David & Lezlie Hudiburg Family Fdn at a glance

· Private foundation

David & Lezlie Hudiburg Family Fdn

Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.1M
Granted FY2019
2
Grants FY2019
2
States reached
$3.1M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Philanthropy$3.2MHuman Services$184kReligion$134kHealth$92kEmployment$70kHousing & Shelter$60kEducation$58kRecreation & Sports$57kOther$0
02FY2019 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $250k+1 grant · $3.1M
$3,082,565
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HUDIBURG FAMILY FOUNDATION$3,082,565
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $113k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PEPPERS RANCH: $2k → 12%STAND IN THE GAP MINISTRIES: $8k → 13%THE CARE CENTER: $10k → 16%JESUS HOUSE: $10k → 16%YMCA OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY: $25k → 16%HEARTS FOR HEARING: $3k → 16%HEARTS FOR HEARING: $3k → 16%WARRIORS FOR FREEDOM: $30k → 16%OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION FOR THE DISABLED: $10k → 16%SPECIAL CARE: $5k → 16%BRITVIL COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $4k → 16%BRITVIL COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $4k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
CO
NE
MO
AZ
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

7%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$287k · 12 repeat orgs$3.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +98% since the first grant, against +40% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2019, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
44

Total granted

$287k
$612k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+98%
+40%

Still filing today

75%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
Human ServicesEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentHealthEmploymentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $60k · revenue +261%
  • SS
    SHILOH SUMMER CAMP INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $50k · revenue +67%
  • WI
    WATER4 INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $45k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • BB
    BAYLOR BEAR FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • YO
    YWCA OKLAHOMA CITY
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • WP
    WESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $34k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Life International

To partner with leaders globally to boldly proclaim the biblical truth of the father's heart for life, champion the gospel of jesus christ, and establish life-giving ministries.

Health
2
Habitat for Humanity of Okaloosa County Inc

Okaloosa habitat for humanity is a non-profit, christian organization dedicated to eliminating substandard housing in okaloosa county. we provide opportunites for the community to show god's love in action. through partnership with people…

Housing & Shelter
3
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
4
City Rescue Mission Inc

Our mission is to lead our community by serving people experiencing or at risk of homelessness with help, hope, and healing, in the spirit of excellence, under the call of christ.

Human Services
5
Hope and Home

Hope & home creates ways for amazing people to change the lives of children in foster care. as a nondenominational christian charity, hope & home trains, certifies, and actively supports foster families across the state of colorado.…

Human Services
6
World Vision Inc

World vision, inc. is a christian humanitarian organization dedicated to working with children, families, and their communities worldwide to reach their full potential by tackling the causes of poverty and injustice. (continued on schedule…

International
7
Freedom House Ministries

House of Hope Kansas City is unique, because we work with teens and their parents to find solutions and ultimately, restoration of healthy family relationships. We serve families in crisis with our program for residents to experience the…

Education
8
World Hope International Inc

The purpose of world hope international, inc. (whi) includes providing assistance to economically disadvantaged people through long-term social transformation projects, including anti-trafficking protection, clean water, economic…

International
9
Residential Opportunities Inc

We partner with children and adults with disabilities and their families so they may live more meaningful, healthy, and independent lives in their homes and communities.

Human Services
10
World Orphans

World orphans vision is to empower the church to care for orphans and vulnerable families. we equip, inspire, and mobilize the church to care for orphans and vulnerable children. churches engaged. children restored. communities transformed…

—
11
Global Outreach International Inc

To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over fifty seven countries around the world.

International
12
Miracle Hill Ministries Inc

Miracle hill ministries is committed to life transformation for children and adults experiencing homelessness. more information and program outcomes may be found at www.miraclehill.org.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Positive Tomorrows Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hudiburg Family Foundation Inc Attn David Hudiburg. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/40
Grantees still filing
29/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HUDIBURG FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ATTN DAVID HUDIBURG: $3,082,565 · PhilanthropyHUDIBURG FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ATTN DAVID HUDIBURGBAYLOR BEAR FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherBAYLOR BEAR FO…YWCA OKLAHOMA CITY: $50,000 · OtherYWCA OKLAHOMA …WESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $34,000 · OtherWESTMINSTER PR…KIPP REACH ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL: $32,535 · OtherKIPP REACH ACA…ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $30,000 · OtherALZHEIMER'S AS…OKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FND: $25,000 · OtherHOPE HOUSE: $25,000 · OtherBRITTON CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $20,000 · OtherBIGLIFE INTERNATIONAL INC: $30,000 · OtherBIGLIFE INTERN…CRESTED BUTTE LAND TRUST: $20,000 · OtherREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $25,000 · OtherTeach for America Inc: $25,000 · OtherBETHEL FOUNDATION: $18,000 · Other+22 more: $131,250 · Other+22 moreWATER4 INC: $45,000 · Human ServicesWARRIORS FOR FREEDOM: $30,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY: $25,000 · Human ServicesJesus House Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesOKLAHOMA FOUNDATION FOR THE DISABLED INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesCare Center-Child Abuse Response and Evaluation Inc DBA The CARE Center: $10,000 · Human ServicesBritVil Community Food Pantry: $8,000 · Human ServicesSTAND IN THE GAP INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesHearts for Hearing Foundation: $5,500 · Human Services+3 more: $9,500 · Human ServicesSHILOH SUMMER CAMP INC: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentPOSITIVE TOMORROWS INC: $17,000 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentCENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES INC: $60,000 · EmploymentTHE EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT MINISTRY INC: $10,000 · EmploymentALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $25,000 · Civil RightsFIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE: $20,000 · Civil RightsINTEGRIS Health Foundation Inc: $20,000 · HealthHOPE IS ALIVE MINISTRIES INC: $11,000 · HealthOklahoma Medical Research Foundation: $7,500 · Health
Philanthropy$3,082,565Other$515,785Human Services$160,500Youth Development$72,000Employment$70,000Civil Rights$45,000Health$38,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHUDIBURG FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ATTN DAVID HUDIBURG: $3,082,565 over 1y, 68% of budgetCENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES INC: $60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWATER4 INC: $45,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWARRIORS FOR FREEDOM: $30,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCRESTED BUTTE LAND TRUST: $20,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetINTEGRIS Health Foundation Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBETHEL FOUNDATION: $18,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetPOSITIVE TOMORROWS INC: $17,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE URBAN MISSION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHOPE IS ALIVE MINISTRIES INC: $11,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetThe Dragonfly Home Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetWORLD NEIGHBORS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJesus House Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNOVO MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE GENESIS PROJECT: $8,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBritVil Community Food Pantry: $8,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetSTAND IN THE GAP INC: $7,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetOklahoma Medical Research Foundation: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHearts for Hearing Foundation: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL CARE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HUGS PROJECT INCORPORATED: $3,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIELDS & FUTURES FOUNDATION: $2,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPEPPERS RANCH INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oklahoma City Communi…Inasmuch FoundationEl and Thelma Gaylord…Servant FoundationWegener Foundation IncSarkeys FoundationThe Merrick FoundationHarris Foundation IncAmerican Fidelity Fou…Communities Foundatio…Hudiburg Family Found…Love Meyer Family Fou…
Oklahoma City Community Foundation IncOK46.8× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Inasmuch Foundation · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Servant Foundation · Wegener Foundation Inc · Sarkeys Foundation · The Merrick Foundation · Harris Foundation Inc · American Fidelity Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Hudiburg Family Foundation Inc Attn David Hudiburg · Love Meyer Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization David & Lezlie Hudiburg Family Fdn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from David & Lezlie Hudiburg Family Fdn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 150%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 31%
  • World Neighbors Inc: 46% of income from government
  • Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation: 31% of income from government
  • Oklahoma City Family Justice Center Inc: 14% of income from government
  • Special Care Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
15get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to David & Lezlie Hudiburg Family Fdn?

Find your warmest path to David & Lezlie Hudiburg Family Fdn through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on David & Lezlie Hudiburg Family Fdn’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home