· Private foundation
David & Esther Muschel Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k45 grants · $52k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CONGREGATION AHAVATH TORAH | $17,743 |
| BOCA JEWISH CENTER | $5,581 |
| CAMP MOSHAVA | $3,642 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,995 |
| UJA Federation of NY Israel Emergency Day After Fu | $2,500 |
| RAMAZ SCHOOL | $2,500 |
| HEBREW CHARTER SCHOOLS | $2,500 |
| Iyun Haparsha | $2,360 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT ERETZ HATZVI | $2,276 |
| OUR PLACE | $2,018 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| PROJECT EXTREME | $2,000 |
| CONGREGATION BNAI YESH NAIYESHURUN | $2,000 |
| YAD ELIEZER | $1,800 |
| FRIENDS OF BET SABAH ELAZRAKI | $1,500 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.
77 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2024, 55 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- SISharsheret Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $78k · revenue +187%
- FOFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC7× · 2018–2024 · $51k · revenue +274%
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM3× · 2020–2024 · $18k · revenue +198%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $10k
- UWUNITED WAY OF BERGEN COUNTYone grant, 2019 · $4k · revenue -6%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $4k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To further jewish education in israel
To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.
Furtherance of jewish education
To support religious, charitable, scientific, literary and/or educational programs
Raise funds for religious and educational institutions in the state of israel, and to provide educational and social improvement for the children of kiryat arba, israel.
To voluntarily assist the house of religious learning known as yeshiva neveh zion in israel
To provide support to jewish religious education in israel and around the world, and provide financial assistance to and on behalf of yeshivah beth israel tifereth menachem.
To promote, assist, and sponsor the spreading of Jewish religious education in Israel. The organization will also organize inspirational gatherings in the USA to enhance the participants' Torah knowledge.
How this is measured
70 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 70 of the 226 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Sharsheret Inc ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
- Who funds BL GIRLS TOWN JERUSALEM INC ↗
- Who funds IYUN HAPARSHA INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC ↗
- Who funds BRIS AVROHOM INC ↗
- Who funds American Friends of Migdal OHR ↗
- Who funds EMUNAH OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds YAD YISROEL ↗
- Who funds MORIAH SCHOOL OF ENGLEWOOD ↗
- Who funds Project Ezrah Needs Inc ↗
- Who funds Yeshivat Ashreinu Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF BERGEN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Rav Moshe Feinstein Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Fjc · Cross River Community Foundation · The Blumenfeld Family Foundation · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · The Daniel E and Joyce G Straus Family Foundation · M D Katz Foundation Inc · Jewish Federation of Northern New Jersey Inc · The Alan and Elisa Pines Family Foundation Inc · The Arthur & Joyce Fein Family Foundation · The Ojc Fund · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization David & Esther Muschel Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from David & Esther Muschel Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
- Sharsheret Inc: 4% of income from government
- One Family Inc: 1% of income from government
How this is measured
Play a game based on David & Esther Muschel’s filings →