Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Dave Durbano Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$305k
Granted FY2024still arriving
24
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
0174% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212024.

Animals$454kPhilanthropy$101kHuman Services$73kYouth Development$48kHousing & Shelter$30kHealth$15kArts & Culture$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $288k
$13,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$510k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPAY NEUTER IMPERATIVE PROJECT$30,000
LOVING ANGEL SERVICE DOGS$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
GREAT PYRENESE RESCUE FOUNDATION$15,000
SALT RIVER WILD HORSE GROUP$13,000
FUREVER FRIENDS ANIMAL OASIS$13,000
HORSE WARRIORS$13,000
SANCTUARY HORSES$13,000
Individual grant recipient$13,000
UTAH ANIMAL ADVOCACY FOUNDATION$13,000
WILDLIFE REHAB CENTER OF NORTHERN UTAH$13,000
DUSTIN TIME RESCUE$13,000
THE GOLDEN BARK FOUNDATION$13,000
AT LIBERTY RANCH$13,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%LOVING ANGEL SERVICE DOGS: $15k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$795k · 20 repeat orgs$122k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against -16% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
7

Total granted

$795k
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
-16%

Still filing today

25%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHealthArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UA
    UTAH ANIMAL ADVOCACY FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $55k · revenue +43%
  • FH
    FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $25k · revenue +43%
  • HW
    HORSE WARRIORS
    2× · 2023–2024 · $23k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • HF
    HAYESTOUGH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue -81%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • OR
    OUR RESCUE
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -16%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope Fur Paws Rescue

To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

Animals
2
2nd Chance Ranch and Rescue

Sanctuary for abused or abandoned animals

Animals
3
Fred's Mission Rescue and Sanctuary

Rescue dogs, which includes housing, vetting, and transport.

Animals
4
Their Lives Matter

Dog rescue and care nurturing finding a home

Animals
5
St Clouds Rescue
Animals
6
Where the Wild Things Are Rescue in

The rescue and rehabilitation of canines.

Animals
7
Almost Home Canine Rescue

Resuce, care and adopting canines

Animals
8
Pom and the Hound Animal Refuge

Animal Welfare

9
Saved By Fate Inc

Dog rescue

Animals
10
Wolfe Ranch Rescue
Animals
11
Fur Animal Rescue

Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.

Animals
12
Grace Farm Animal Rescue and Sanctu
Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sanctuary Horses and the most unlike its peers is Hayestough Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
7/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SPAY NEUTER IMPERATIVE PROJECT — $100,000 · OtherSPAY NEUTER IMPERATIVE PROJECTIndividual grant recipient — $65,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $65,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGREAT PYRENESE RESCUE FOUNDATION — $51,000 · OtherGREAT PYRENESE RESCUE FOUNDATIONLOVING ANGLE SERVICE DOGS — $48,000 · OtherLOVING ANGLE SERVICE DOGSAT LIBERTY RANCH — $48,000 · OtherAT LIBERTY RANCHLAZY B EQUINE RESCUE OF UT — $47,000 · OtherLAZY B EQUINE RESCUE OF UTJACKSON DAY FOUNDATION — $47,000 · OtherJACKSON DAY FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $36,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $33,000 · OtherST ANNE'S CENTER — $30,000 · OtherFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · Other+9 more — $127,500 · Other+9 moreUTAH ANIMAL ADVOCACY FOUNDATION — $55,000 · AnimalsUTAH ANIMAL ADV…Salt River Wild Horse Management Group Inc — $23,000 · AnimalsSalt River Wild…GOLDEN BARK FOUNDATION — $13,000 · AnimalsGOLDEN BARK FOU…DUSTIN TIME RESCUE — $13,000 · AnimalsDUSTIN TIME RES…SANCTUARY HORSES — $13,000 · AnimalsSANCTUARY HORSE…FUREVER FRIENDS ANIMAL OASIS — $13,000 · AnimalsFUREVER FRIENDS…HOPES RESCUE INC — $5,000 · Animals+1 more — $1,000 · AnimalsCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE — $54,000 · PhilanthropyHORSE WARRIORS — $23,000 · Youth DevelopmentHAYESTOUGH FOUNDATION — $15,000 · HealthLOVING ANGEL SERVICE DOGS INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesOUR RESCUE — $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$722,500Animals$136,000Philanthropy$54,000Youth Development$23,000Health$15,000Human Services$15,000Arts & Culture$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUTAH ANIMAL ADVOCACY FOUNDATION — $55,000 over 4y, 9.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE — $54,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST ANNE'S CENTER — $30,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHORSE WARRIORS — $23,000 over 2y, 7.9% of budgetSalt River Wild Horse Management Group Inc — $23,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetHAYESTOUGH FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetLOVING ANGEL SERVICE DOGS INC — $15,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetGOLDEN BARK FOUNDATION — $13,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetDUSTIN TIME RESCUE — $13,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetSANCTUARY HORSES — $13,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetFUREVER FRIENDS ANIMAL OASIS — $13,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetOUR RESCUE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPES RESCUE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UTAH ANIMAL ADVOCACY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE
  • Who funds ST ANNE'S CENTER
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds HORSE WARRIORS
  • Who funds Salt River Wild Horse Management Group Inc
  • Who funds HAYESTOUGH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds LOVING ANGEL SERVICE DOGS INC
  • Who funds GOLDEN BARK FOUNDATION
  • Who funds DUSTIN TIME RESCUE
  • Who funds SANCTUARY HORSES
  • Who funds FUREVER FRIENDS ANIMAL OASIS
  • Who funds OUR RESCUE
  • Who funds HOPES RESCUE INC
  • Who funds Big Guy Littles World Sanctuary Inc
  • Who funds FORGOTTEN TO SPOILED ROTTEN SANCTUARY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Paypal Charitable Giving FundDC7.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dave Durbano Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Dave Durbano Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Dave Durbano Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph