Skip to content

· Private foundation

Daryl & Steven Roth Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
51
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$320k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$8.6MArts & Culture$2.4MReligion$1.7MHealth$1.0MPhilanthropy$905kCivil Rights$251kInternational$210kHousing & Shelter$196kOther$0
02FY2025 · 51 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k28 grants · $63k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $249k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $450k
  • $250k+2 grants · $570k
$5,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$46k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LINCOLN CENTER THEATER$320,000
NATL THEATRE IN AMERICA$250,000
UJA-FEDERATION OF NEW YORK$100,000
SOUTHAMPTON HOSP FDN$100,000
SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY - HILLEL INTERNATIONAL$50,000
PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION$50,000
CHABAD AT DARTMOUTH$50,000
YALE COLLEGE$50,000
VINEYARD THEATRE$50,000
ROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY$45,000
NEW YORK CITY CENTER$25,000
HASTY PUDDING INST OF 1770$25,000
ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI$25,000
GUILD HALL OF EAST HAMPTON$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOT BREAD KITCHEN: $1k → 17%THE NEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%THE NEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%ENCORE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $3k → 17%ENCORE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
VA
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 57% of Daryl & Steven Roth Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Daryl & Steven Roth Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 58% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.2M · 73 repeat orgs$9.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

73 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2025, 42 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

73
90

Total granted

$7.2M
$9.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+8%

Still filing today

70%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $432k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHealthEnvironmentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +46%
  • TV
    THE VIVIAN BEAUMONT THEATERINC D/B/A LINCOLN CENTER THEATER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $910k · revenue +159%
  • JF
    JOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS
    5× · 2020–2024 · $706k · revenue +160%

Funded once

  • TO
    TRUSTEES OF DARTMOUTH COLLEGE
    one grant, 2020 · $8.1M
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $250k
  • RN
    RIVERDALE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $132k · revenue +83%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Transport Group Inc Dba Transport Group Theatre Company

Producing and developing plays and musicals.

Arts & Culture
2
New York Shakespeare Festival

As the nation's foremost producer of shakespeare and new work, the public theater is dedicated to achieving artistic excellence while developing an american theater that is accessible and relevant to all people through productions of…

Arts & Culture
3
Miami New Drama

Miami new drama is a nonprofit professional theater company based in miami beach, florida, dedicated to the development and production of new theatrical work and to theater-making as a means of social engagement, cultural conversation, and…

Arts & Culture
4
Susan Smith Blackburn Prize Inc
—
5
The New Group Inc

The new group is an artist-driven company with a commitment to developing and producing powerful, contemporary theater. while constantly evolving, we maintain an ensemble approach to all our work and an articulated style of emotional…

Arts & Culture
6
The Neue Galerie New York
Arts & Culture
7
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
8
Atlantic Theater Company

At Atlantic, our aim is singular: to empower simple and honest storytelling that fosters greater understanding of our shared world. Across our work, we are a family of artists dedicated to exploring essential truths onstage, be it a show…

Arts & Culture
9
Parity Productions Inc
Arts & Culture
10
The Royal National Theatre

Theatre can lead to extraordinary moments of shared imagination. it enables us to stand in anothers shoes to better understand ourselves and the world around us. it shows us who we are, who we have been, who we could be. the nt delivers on…

Arts & Culture
11
Arthur Miller Foundation

To honor the legacy of the great american playwright, arthur miller, and his new york city public school education, the arthur miller foundation (the "foundation") increases equitable access to quality theater education for public school…

Philanthropy
12
New York Public Radio

To make the mind more curious, the heart more open, and the spirit more joyful through excellent audio programming that is deeply rooted in new york.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Theatre Development Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is Foundation to Combat Anti-Semitism Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

120 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 120 of the 186 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
119/120
Grantees still filing
75/120
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRUSTEES OF DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $8,086,806 · OtherTRUSTEES OF DARTMOUTH COLLEGETEMPLE ISRAEL OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $1,165,500 · OtherTEMPLE ISRAEL OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK+100 more: $2,513,645 · Other+100 moreTHE VIVIAN BEAUMONT THEATERINC D/B/A LINCOLN CENTER THEATER: $910,000 · Arts & CultureTHE VIVIAN BEAUM…JOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $706,212 · Arts & CultureJOHN F KENNEDY C…ROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY INC: $185,000 · Arts & CultureROUNDABOUT THEAT…GUILD HALL OF EAST HAMPTON INC: $143,000 · Arts & CultureGUILD HALL OF EA…+49 more: $531,000 · Arts & Culture+49 moreUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $1,002,000 · PhilanthropyPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $25,250 · PhilanthropyHorace Mann School: $258,000 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $150,000 · EducationTrustees of Dartmouth College: $99,000 · EducationFAMILY EQUALITY: $90,000 · EducationMOREHOUSE COLLEGE: $50,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $25,000 · Education+9 more: $33,100 · EducationTHE SOUTHAMPTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $525,000 · HealthPULMONARY FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $70,000 · Health+6 more: $25,500 · HealthFOUNDATION TO COMBAT ANTI-SEMITISM INC: $100,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $60,800 · Civil Rights+1 more: $2,500 · Civil RightsRIVERDALE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC: $132,000 · Community Improvement
Other$11,765,951Arts & Culture$2,475,212Philanthropy$1,127,250Education$705,100Health$620,500Civil Rights$163,300Community Improvement$132,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $1,002,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE VIVIAN BEAUMONT THEATERINC D/B/A LINCOLN CENTER THEATER: $910,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetJOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $706,212 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SOUTHAMPTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $525,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetHorace Mann School: $258,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY INC: $185,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $150,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGUILD HALL OF EAST HAMPTON INC: $143,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetRIVERDALE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC: $132,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetNEW YORK CITY POLICE FOUNDATION INC: $105,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATION TO COMBAT ANTI-SEMITISM INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College: $99,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY EQUALITY: $90,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetIMPACTISRAEL INC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPULMONARY FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $65,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $60,800 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC: $51,100 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPHIPPS NEIGHBORHOODS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMOREHOUSE COLLEGE: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget1LOVE4ANIMALS INC: $43,500 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSIGNATURE THEATRE COMPANY INC: $27,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HASTY PUDDING - INSTITUTE OF 1770 INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT RUTH INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTIC GOLF CLUB EDUCATIONAL FUND INC: $25,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetNEW YORK CITY CENTER INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew DramatistsInc: $25,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetNEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK THEATRE WORKSHOP INC: $24,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE TANK LTD: $23,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetAUTRY MUSEUM OF THE AMERICAN WEST: $21,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL THEATRE IN AMERICA INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBAY STREET THEATRE FESTIVAL INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S AND YOUNG WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION: $17,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPrimary Stages Company Inc: $16,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEW 42ND STREET INC: $13,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKING GROUND HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER THEATRE GROUP OF LOS ANGELES: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMCCARTER THEATRE COMPANY: $12,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE VIVIAN BEAUMONT THEATERINC D/B/A LINCOLN CENTER THEATER ↗
  • Who funds JOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
  • Who funds THE SOUTHAMPTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Horace Mann School ↗
  • Who funds ROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
  • Who funds GUILD HALL OF EAST HAMPTON INC ↗
  • Who funds RIVERDALE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK CITY POLICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION TO COMBAT ANTI-SEMITISM INC ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Dartmouth College ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY EQUALITY ↗
  • Who funds IMPACTISRAEL INC ↗
  • Who funds PULMONARY FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds BROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds PHIPPS NEIGHBORHOODS INC ↗
  • Who funds MOREHOUSE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds 1LOVE4ANIMALS INC ↗
  • Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗
  • Who funds MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds SIGNATURE THEATRE COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Shubert Foundation IncNY38.4× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Shubert Foundation Inc · The Howard Gilman Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The New York Community Trust · The Lucille Lortel Foundation Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Richenthal Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Hispanic Federation Inc · The Andrew W Mellon Foundation · Booth Ferris Foundation Xxxxx4008 · Jerome Robbins Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Daryl & Steven Roth Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Daryl & Steven Roth Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Daughters of Miriam Center: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
32report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 186 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Daryl & Steven Roth’s filings →

More from the funding graph