· Public charity
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Health
D-HH operates to establish, manage, govern, and fundraise for an integrated healthcare delivery System.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2017
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $89k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $531k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| The Trustees of Dartmouth College | $200,000 |
| City Year Inc | $150,000 |
| Cheshire Medical Center | $101,463 |
| Granite State United Way | $80,000 |
| Friends of Recovery New Hampshire | $38,580 |
| St Joseph Hospital | $25,000 |
| Alice Peck Day Memorial Hospital | $25,000 |
| Easter Seals New Hampshire | $6,313 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.
D-HH operates to establish, manage, govern, and fundraise for an integrated healthcare delivery System. To that end, D-HH is particularly focused to: - Manage the healthcare System to provide services to the public in the most…
CH-Laconia is a charitable organization which exists to meet the health needs of individuals within the communities it serves.
Mt. ascutney hospital and health center's mission is to improve the lives of those we serve.
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
Home Health and Hospice Care provides trusted patient centered services that enhance each individual's independence and quality throughout life.
Monadnock Community Hospital is committed to improving the health and well-being of our community. We will elevate the health of our community by providing accessible, high quality and value based care.
To serve the people of the Saratoga region by providing them access to excellence in healthcare in a supportive and caring environment.
CH-Franklin is a charitable organization which exists to meet the health needs of individuals within the communities it serves.
We are dedicated to delivering outstanding home health and hospice services that enrich the lives of the people we serve.
Dartmouth-hitchcock medical center's mission is to offer administrative, planning, and other services designed to promote, advance, and strengthen the interdependent and synergistic activities of the independent supported organizations in…
Southern New Hampshire Medical Center is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve. Southern New Hampshire Medical Center is a provider of choice, delivering…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cheshire Medical Center and the most unlike its peers is Easter Seals New Hampshire Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Mary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital · New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Dartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Dartmouth-Hitchcock Health funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.