Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Darthea N Morrow Trust Dtd 102081 Sch9011

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$36k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 50% of DARTHEA N MORROW TRUST DTD 102081 SCH9011’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Annika van der Wende$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 61% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EMERY-RIDDLE: $4k → 14%BRIDGEWATER STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%BRANDEIS UNIV: $4k → 8%Endicott College: $4k → 10%Stonehill College Inc: $4k → 11%University of Massachusetts Amherst: $10k → 12%Northeastern University: $4k → 16%WESTFIELD STATE COLLEGE: $4k → 17%BRYN MAWR COLLEGE: $5k → 10%Lafayette College: $4k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO: $5k → 11%Trustees of Union College: $4k → 12%ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECH: $4k → 14%ITHACA COLLEGE: $4k → 16%PACE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 17%TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $5k → 11%THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $4k → 14%University of Tampa: $4k → 13%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ST LOUIS: $5k → 11%MITCHELL COLLEGE: $5k → 9%SACRED HEART UNIVERSITY: $4k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT: $5k → 11%Quinnipiac University: $4k → 12%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND: $10k → 7%PROVIDENCE COLLEGE: $4k → 14%CLARK ATLANTA UNIVERSITY: $5k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA: $5k → 27%GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $4k → 6%UNIV OF VIRGINIA: $4k → 8%Saint Michaels College: $4k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE: $4k → 9%UNION COLLEGE: $4k → 33%UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND: $4k → 9%UMASS LOWELL: $5k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MASS AMHERST: $8k → 12%Springfield College: $4k → 17%FAIRFIELD UNIVERSITY: $4k → 9%University of Vermont Foundation: $4k → 10%Tufts University: $4k → 8%University of Massachusetts Amherst: $8k → 12%UMASS BOSTON: $5k → 16%UNIV OF SOUTH FLORIDA: $4k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT: $4k → 10%UMASS BOSTON: $4k → 16%HAMPSHIRE COLLEGE: $6k → 12%UMASS BOSTON: $4k → 16%SMITH COLLEGE: $4k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
NY
MA
PA
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

22%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$66k · 6 repeat orgs$238k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
46

Total granted

$66k
$202k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+10%

Still filing today

67%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2021–2023 · $7k · revenue +53%
  • TU
    The University of Tampa Incorporated
    2× · 2021–2023 · $7k · revenue +36%
  • Rochester Institute of Technology
    2× · 2020–2023 · $7k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MASS AMHERST
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
  • HC
    HAMPSHIRE COLLEGE TRUSTEESgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $6k · revenue +53%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
5
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
6
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
7
Roger Williams University

At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…

Education
8
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
9
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
10
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
11
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
12
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Quinnipiac University and the most unlike its peers is Coastal Carolina University Research Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 83 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%3%10–20yr16%6%20–35yr13%12%35–55yr16%79%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%3%10–20yr16%7%20–35yr13%13%35–55yr16%77%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/38
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,527

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/37
Grantees still filing
27/37
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Clark Atlanta University Inc — $8,000 · EducationNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY — $7,000 · EducationThe University of Tampa Incorporated — $7,000 · EducationRochester Institute of Technology — $7,000 · EducationHAMPSHIRE COLLEGE TRUSTEES — $6,000 · Education+31 more — $122,000 · Education+31 moreUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst — $21,000 · OtherUniversity of Massachusetts AmherstUMASS BOSTON — $16,000 · OtherUMASS BOSTONUNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND — $10,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLANDUNIVERSITY OF MASS AMHERST — $8,000 · Other+26 more — $99,000 · Other+26 more
Education$157,000Other$154,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetClark Atlanta University Inc — $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY — $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe University of Tampa Incorporated — $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRochester Institute of Technology — $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHAMPSHIRE COLLEGE TRUSTEES — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMITCHELL COLLEGE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRYN MAWR COLLEGE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOASTAL CAROLINA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetUniversity of New England — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAFAYETTE COLLEGE — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSACRED HEART UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetITHACA COLLEGE — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF UNION COLLEGE IN THE TOWN OF SCHENECTADY IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTONEHILL COLLEGE INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROVIDENCE COLLEGE — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNION COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPRINGFIELD COLLEGE — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPACE UNIVERSITY — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetQUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENDICOTT COLLEGE — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT MICHAEL'S COLLEGE — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFairfield University — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Maine Foundation — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBridgton Academy — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFordham University — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFITCHBURG STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOLLEGE OF CHARLESTON FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC10.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Darthea N Morrow Trust Dtd 102081 Sch9011 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Trustees of Tufts College — 11% of income from government
  • Brandeis University — 8% of income from government
  • Northeastern University — 4% of income from government
  • Mitchell College — 1% of income from government
  • Stonehill College Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Saint Michael's College — 1% of income from government
  • Fairfield University — 1% of income from government
  • Sacred Heart University Incorporated — 0% of income from government
  • The Trustees of the Smith College — 0% of income from government
  • Quinnipiac University — 0% of income from government
  • Springfield College — 0% of income from government
  • Endicott College — 0% of income from government
  • The University of Tampa Incorporated — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines