Skip to content

· Private foundation

Darling Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$420k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Environment$540kAnimals$420kArts & Culture$280kEducation$140kCommunity Improvement$140kReligion$140k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $210k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $210k
$35,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Nature Conservancy$110,000
Soaring Hawk Raptor Rehabilitation Center$100,000
High Speed Rail Alliance$35,000
Anti-Cruelty Society$35,000
Chicago Symphony Orchestra$35,000
Fourth Presbyterian Church$35,000
Jazz Institute of Chicago$35,000
Devereux-Glenhome School$35,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 48% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%Devereux-Glenhome School: $47k → 9%Jazz Institute of Chicago: $47k → 14%The Nature Conservancy: $190k → 7%Devereux-Glenhome School: $35k → 9%Jazz Institute of Chicago: $35k → 14%The Nature Conservancy: $120k → 7%Devereux-Glenhome School: $35k → 9%Jazz Institute of Chicago: $35k → 14%The Nature Conservancy: $120k → 7%Devereux-Glenhome School: $23k → 9%Jazz Institute of Chicago: $23k → 14%The Nature Conservancy: $110k → 7%High Speed Rail Alliance: $35k → 14%High Speed Rail Alliance: $35k → 14%Fourth Presbyterian Church: $47k → 14%Fourth Presbyterian Church: $35k → 14%Fourth Presbyterian Church: $35k → 14%Fourth Presbyterian Church: $23k → 14%Anti-Cruelty Society: $47k → 14%Anti-Cruelty Society: $35k → 14%Anti-Cruelty Society: $35k → 14%Anti-Cruelty Society: $23k → 14%Chicago Symphony Orchestra: $47k → 14%Chicago Symphony Orchestra: $35k → 14%Chicago Symphony Orchestra: $35k → 14%Chicago Symphony Orchestra: $23k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 7 repeat orgs$90k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
3

Total granted

$1.0M
$90k

Still filing today

71%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’23’24’25
AnimalsArts & CultureEducationCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    Soarin Hawk Raptor Rehabilitation Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $260k · revenue +5% · 74% of their budget
  • TE
    THE EDUCATION ASSOC OF CHRISTIAN
    4× · 2021–2025 · $140k
  • JI
    Jazz Institute of Chicago
    4× · 2021–2025 · $140k · revenue -83%

Funded once

  • MH
    Midwest High Speed Rail Alliance
    one grant, 2023 · $47k
  • MH
    Midwest High Speed Rail Association
    one grant, 2021 · $23k
  • SH
    Soarin Hawk Raptor Rehabilitation Center
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/7
Grantees still filing
3/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $540,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYFourth Presbyterian Church: $139,999 · OtherFourth Presbyterian ChurchMidwest High Speed Rail Alliance: $46,667 · OtherMidwest High Speed Rail Alliance+2 more: $43,334 · Other+2 moreSoarin Hawk Raptor Rehabilitation Inc: $260,000 · AnimalsSoarin Hawk Raptor Rehabili…The Anti-Cruelty Society: $139,998 · AnimalsThe Anti-Cruelty SocietyJazz Institute of Chicago: $140,001 · Arts & CultureJazz Institute of C…Chicago Symphony Orchestra: $140,000 · Arts & CultureChicago Symphony Or…THE EDUCATION ASSOC OF CHRISTIAN: $140,001 · EducationTHE EDUCA…HIGH SPEED RAIL ALLIANCE: $70,000 · Community Improvement
Other$770,000Animals$399,998Arts & Culture$280,001Education$140,001Community Improvement$70,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $540,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSoarin Hawk Raptor Rehabilitation Inc: $260,000 over 3y, 74% of budgetJazz Institute of Chicago: $140,001 over 4y, 22% of budgetChicago Symphony Orchestra: $140,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetThe Anti-Cruelty Society: $139,998 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHIGH SPEED RAIL ALLIANCE: $70,000 over 2y, 5.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Soarin Hawk Raptor Rehabilitation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE EDUCATION ASSOC OF CHRISTIAN ↗
  • Who funds Jazz Institute of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Symphony Orchestra ↗
  • Who funds The Anti-Cruelty Society ↗
  • Who funds HIGH SPEED RAIL ALLIANCE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Darling Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Darling Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Darling Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph