Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Daniel W Dietrich II Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$20MEducation$2.8MPhilanthropy$1.9MEnvironment$422kHuman Services$135kCivil Rights$300
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $300
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $226k
  • $250k+3 grants · $2.1M
$170,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$61M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CURTIS INSTITUTE OF MUSIC$1,000,000
WESTTOWN SCHOOL$830,000
THE WOODMERE ART MUSEUM$250,000
VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT FUND$170,000
ASSOCIATION FOR PUBLIC ART$56,000
NETWORK FOR NEW MUSIC$15,000
THEATRE HORIZON$10,000
COMMUNICATION FIRST$300
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–21, $215k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PHILADELPHIA CONTEMPORARY: $80k → 22%WILLIAM WAY LGBT COMMUNITY CENTER: $75k → 22%WILLIAM WAY LGBT COMMUNITY CENTER: $60k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
PA
RI
CA
CO
NM
DC
HI
LA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$19M · 21 repeat orgs$5.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against -30% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
11

Total granted

$19M
$5.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
-30%

Still filing today

76%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    CURTIS INSTITUTE OF MUSIC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $4.3M · revenue +62%
  • WA
    WOODMERE ART MUSEUM
    3× · 2020–2025 · $535k · revenue +180%
  • PI
    PLAYPENN INC
    5× · 2018–2024 · $140k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • HM
    HARWOOD MUSEUM OF ART
    one grant, 2017 · $2.5M
  • PM
    PHILADLEPHIA MUSEUM OF ART
    one grant, 2021 · $2.0M
  • TC
    THE CLAY STUDIO
    one grant, 2022 · $250k · revenue -30%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Phillips Collection

The phillips collection is the oldest museum of modern and contemporary art in the u.s. in addition to presentation of works from the permanent collection and special exhibitions, the museum maintains active educational, academic,…

Arts & Culture
2
Munson-Williams-Proctor Arts Institute

Munson-williams-proctor arts institute (mwpai) is a fine arts center dedicated to serving diverse audiences by advancing the appreciation, understanding, and enjoyment of the arts. the art institute aims to promote interest and…

Arts & Culture
3
Moore College of Art and Design

Moore is dedicated to excellence in art and design. Founded in 1848, Moore is the first and only visual arts college for women in the US. With its undergraduate BFA degree for women and coeducational graduate programs, Moore cultivates…

Education
4
Balletx

Balletx expands the vocabulary of contemporary ballet for all audiences through innovative performances, world premiere choreography, dance education, and community programs.

Arts & Culture
5
The Performance Art Museum

The performance art museum (pam) is the first u.s. institution exclusively dedicated to the presentation and preservation of live art. our mission is to facilitate the powerful impact of live experiences that can profoundly transform our…

Arts & Culture
6
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
7
Berggruen Institute
Education
8
New Museum of Contemporary Art

A center for exhibitions, information, and documentation about living artists since 1977, which continues to be a place of experimentation and a hub of new art and new ideas.

Arts & Culture
9
California Institute of Contemporary Art
10
Baltimore Museum of Art

The baltimore museum of art connects art to baltimore and baltimore to the world, embodying a commitment to artistic excellence and social equity in every decision from art presentation, interpretation, and collecting, to the composition…

Arts & Culture
11
Metropolitan Museum of Art

The metropolitan museum of art collects, studies, conserves, and presents significant works of art across all times and cultures in order to connect people to creativity, knowledge, and ideas.

Arts & Culture
12
Women's Project & Productions Inc

Wp theater is the nation's oldest and largest theater company dedicated to developing, producing, and promoting the work of women+ at every stage of their careers. for over four decades we have served as leaders of a global movement…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Philadelphia Contemporary and the most unlike its peers is The Relational Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%4%<5yr13%8%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr17%4%20–35yr15%39%35–55yr17%31%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%1%<5yr13%0%5–10yr19%28%10–20yr17%0%20–35yr15%9%35–55yr17%61%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/28
the rest of the field
9%
7,129/78,134

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
14/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART — $8,000,000 · Arts & CulturePHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ARTCURTIS INSTITUTE OF MUSIC — $4,275,000 · Arts & CultureCURTIS INSTITUTE OF MUSICWOODMERE ART MUSEUM — $535,000 · Arts & Culture+11 more — $1,086,000 · Arts & Culture+11 moreHARWOOD MUSEUM OF ART — $2,500,000 · OtherHARWOOD MUSEUM OF ARTWESTTOWN SCHOOL — $2,500,000 · OtherWESTTOWN SCHOOLPHILADLEPHIA MUSEUM OF ART — $2,000,000 · OtherPHILADLEPHIA MUSEUM OF ARTVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT FUND — $1,880,000 · OtherVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT FUNDIndividual grant recipient — $422,000 · OtherNEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTSCULTURAL MEDIA COLLABORATIVE — $390,700 · Other+5 more — $380,000 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA ACADEMY OF THE FINE ARTS — $500,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $175,000 · EducationSAINT JOSEPH'S UNIVERSITY — $82,000 · EducationOMEGA INSTITUTE FOR HOLISTIC STUDIES INC — $52,500 · Education+2 more — $800 · EducationWILLIAM WAY LGBT COMMUNITY CENTER — $135,000 · Human ServicesPHILADELPHIA CONTEMPORARY — $80,000 · Human ServicesThe Relational Center — $40,000 · PhilanthropyASTRAL ARTISTS INC — $25,000 · Employment
Arts & Culture$13,896,000Other$10,072,700Education$810,300Human Services$215,000Philanthropy$40,000Employment$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART — $8,000,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetCURTIS INSTITUTE OF MUSIC — $4,275,000 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetWOODMERE ART MUSEUM — $535,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA ACADEMY OF THE FINE ARTS — $500,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTHE CLAY STUDIO — $250,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetBOCA RATON MUSEUM OF ART — $180,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $175,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJAMES A MICHENER ART MUSEUM — $160,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetPLAYPENN INC — $140,000 over 5y, 16% of budgetWILLIAM WAY LGBT COMMUNITY CENTER — $135,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetTHEATER FOR THE NEW CITY FOUNDATION INC — $85,000 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetSAINT JOSEPH'S UNIVERSITY — $82,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRISTOL RIVERSIDE THEATRE CO INC — $60,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetWORLD POETRY INC — $60,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetOMEGA INSTITUTE FOR HOLISTIC STUDIES INC — $52,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART — $45,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPAINTED BRIDE ART CENTER INC — $30,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetASTRAL ARTISTS INC — $25,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetTHEATRE HORIZON INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetAntenna — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The William Penn FoundationPA27.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The William Penn Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · Independence Foundation · The University of the Arts · The Philadelphia Cultural Fund Inc · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · Wyncote Foundation · Lindback Cr & Mf Foundation Tw Main · Connelly Foundation · The Pew Charitable Trusts · The Lida Foundation · Henrietta Tower Wurts Memorial Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Daniel W Dietrich II Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Daniel W Dietrich II Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Daniel W Dietrich II Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph