Skip to content

· Private foundation

Daniel J & Ardith Koster Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$288k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$140k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$481kRecreation & Sports$145kInternational$89kEducation$30kAnimals$15kHuman Services$13kCivil Rights$3kHealth$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $132k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $140k
$20,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$218k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMP AO WA KIYA$140,000
PARTNERS IN EVANGELISM$45,000
WOMEN AT RISK INTL$35,000
SCRIPTURE MEMORY MOUTAIN MISSION$22,000
GRACE MINISTRIES$20,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
HUGS HORSES CHILDREN YOUTH RANCH$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
SEND INTERNATIONAL$5,000
UNITED INDIAN MISSION INTL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WARNING LIGHTS: $5k → 11%WARNING LIGHTS: $2k → 11%WARNING LIGHTS: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
WY
CA
UT
KY
WV
AZ
SC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$799k · 16 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +78% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
14

Total granted

$799k
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
+10%

Still filing today

56%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationInternationalReligionCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CAMP AO-WA-KIYA
    2× · 2021–2024 · $145k · revenue +78%
  • SM
    SCRIPTURE MEMORY MOUNTAIN MISSION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $71k · revenue +82%
  • RF
    REASONS FOR HOPE INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $41k · revenue +147%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • SB
    SOUTHLAND BIBLE CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • TL
    TRANSFORMATION LIFE CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North America Bible Institute

North America Bible Institute (NABI) is an evangelical graduate school, made up of students who are diverse in both ethnicity and ministry aims -- but united in great love for Jesus and his gospel. As a graduate school, NABI offers them…

Education
2
Talking Bibles International

The distribution of Talking Bibles worldwide in as many different languages as possible.

Religion
3
Asbury Theological Seminary

Asbury Theological Seminary is a community called to prepare theologically educated, sanctified, Spirit-filled men and women to evangelize and to spread scriptural holiness throughout the world through the love of Jesus Christ, in the…

Education
4
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
5
Charis Bible College Inc

Charis Bible Colleges, Inc. (CBC) was established to train and equip individuals to carry out the Gospel of Jesus Christ through practical application through mentoring, training, and teaching.

Religion
6
Tim Robnett Ministries Dba ETeamGlobal

To Identify, Affirm, Train, and Mobilize Ephesians 4 evangelists to equip the church for evangelism.

Religion
7
Torch of Christ Ministries

Torch of Christ Ministries provides evangelism, education, and missional support through the dissemination of information with the primary intent of preaching the gospel of Jesus Christ to all.

Religion
8
CrossTalk Global

CrossTalk Global is a Christian educational organization that empowers and trains global church leaders to effectively communicate the Scriptures and share the hope of Christ in their communities. These projects are carried out in the USA…

Religion
9
Tyndale Bible Translators

Bible Translation and acts of Christian Services

Religion
10
International Biblical Training Inc

International Biblical Training is a teaching, training and equipping religious ministry. IBT staff provide theological teaching and training for the purpose of making Christian disciples who in turn train and disciple others in…

Religion
11
Teaching Ministry of the Word of Truth

A training ministry that equips the saints more focusing on preparing leaders and ministers of the word for the work of ministry to the building up of the body of Christ.

Religion
12
R B Thieme Jr Bible Ministries

R. B. Thieme, Jr., Bible Ministries exists to preserve, perpetuate, and disseminate the doctrinal and theological Bible teachings of R. B. Thieme, Jr. Our purpose is to make available his publications and recordings worldwide without…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Blue Letter Bible; the most unlike its peers is Transformation Life Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PARTNERS IN EVANGELISM: $290,816 · OtherPARTNERS IN EVANGELISMCAMP AO-WA-KIYA: $145,000 · OtherCAMP AO-WA-KIYASCRIPTURE MEMORY MOUNTAIN MISSION: $70,890 · OtherSCRIPTURE MEMORY MOUNTAIN MISSIONIndividual grant recipient: $43,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientREASONS FOR HOPE INC: $41,000 · OtherREASONS FOR HOPE INCGrace Ministries: $31,000 · Other+16 more: $81,725 · Other+16 moreWOMEN AT RISK INTERNATIONAL INC: $61,500 · InternationalWOMEN AT R…UNKNOWN NATIONS: $13,000 · InternationalUNKNOWN NA…FRONTIER SCHOOL OF THE BIBLE: $28,500 · Education+3 more: $2,500 · EducationH U G S for Horses and Children: $15,000 · AnimalsWARNING LIGHTS: $8,400 · Human ServicesTRANSFORMATION LIFE CENTER: $5,000 · Community ImprovementOPEN THE BIBLE: $1,500 · ReligionTentmakers Bible Mission Inc: $1,000 · Religion
Other$703,931International$74,500Education$31,000Animals$15,000Human Services$8,400Community Improvement$5,000Religion$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAMP AO-WA-KIYA: $145,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetSCRIPTURE MEMORY MOUNTAIN MISSION: $70,890 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetWOMEN AT RISK INTERNATIONAL INC: $61,500 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetREASONS FOR HOPE INC: $41,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetGrace Ministries: $31,000 over 3y, 7.5% of budgetFRONTIER SCHOOL OF THE BIBLE: $28,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetH U G S for Horses and Children: $15,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetUNKNOWN NATIONS: $13,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWARNING LIGHTS: $8,400 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetOPEN THE BIBLE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Moody Bible Institute of Chicago: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTentmakers Bible Mission Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPregnancy Resource Center: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLUE LETTER BIBLE: $657 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP OF WYOMING INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWheaton College: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAMP AO-WA-KIYA ↗
  • Who funds SCRIPTURE MEMORY MOUNTAIN MISSION ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN AT RISK INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds REASONS FOR HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds Grace Ministries ↗
  • Who funds FRONTIER SCHOOL OF THE BIBLE ↗
  • Who funds H U G S for Horses and Children ↗
  • Who funds UNKNOWN NATIONS ↗
  • Who funds WARNING LIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds TRANSFORMATION LIFE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds OPEN THE BIBLE ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds The Moody Bible Institute of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds Tentmakers Bible Mission Inc ↗
  • Who funds Pregnancy Resource Center ↗
  • Who funds BLUE LETTER BIBLE ↗
  • Who funds CHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP OF WYOMING INC ↗
  • Who funds Wheaton College ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA14.5× affinity16 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Daniel J & Ardith Koster Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Daniel J & Ardith Koster Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Daniel J & Ardith Koster Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Daniel J & Ardith Koster Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Daniel J & Ardith Koster’s filings →

    More from the funding graph