Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Daniel G & Jean K Schuster Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$370k
Granted FY2023
12
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 75% of DANIEL G & JEAN K SCHUSTER FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2023 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 12 grants below total $262,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $370,300 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $107,800 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k5 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $105k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$12,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$141k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Lifetime Wells Vision Inc$100,000
Cavanagh House, Inc$50,000
Upperco Volunteer Fire Company, Inc$40,000
Sisters Academy Of Baltimore$25,000
Girls Expecting More Sucess$17,500
Catholic Charities of Baltimore$12,000
O'Dwyer Retreat House$10,000
Maryland District Amateur Athletic Union$2,500
Metro Maryland Youth For Christ$2,000
Robert Coleman Elementary School$1,500
American Foundation for Suicide Prevention$1,000
Mt. Washington Pediatric Hospital$1,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.7M · 15 repeat orgs$439k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2023, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
33

Total granted

$1.7M
$246k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+7%

Still filing today

47%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 26% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $194k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’22’23
EducationHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyPublic Safety & DisasterYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PY
    POSITIVE YOUTH EXPRESSIONS INC
    3× · 2018–2022 · $182k · revenue +63%
  • GS
    GOOD SHEPHERD NATIVITY MISSION SCHOOL INC
    2× · 2019–2022 · $75k · revenue +32%
  • AC
    ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC
    3× · 2018–2023 · $32k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • CU
    CHRISTIAN UNION CHURCH INC
    one grant, 2018 · $138k
  • HF
    HARFORD FAMILY HOUSE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +178%
  • PP
    Philadelphia Polo Classic, Work To Ride Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Maryland Prayer Center

24 hour pray service

Religion
2
Baltimore Unity Hall Inc
Community Improvement
3
House of the Good Shepherd of the City of Baltimore

Good Shepherd Services closed its residential treatment facility in March 2017. No new mission has been established at this time.

Health
4
Philadelphia Health Services Inc

Mentoring and educational programs for female youth

Youth Development
5
Hope Ignites Baltimore Inc

Boys Hope Girls Hope nurtures and guides motivated young people in need to become well-educated, career-ready men and women for others through its holistic, long-term residential and academy programming. The organization provides direct…

6
The Og Center

Provide mental services to residents of baltimore city and surrounding counties

Human Services
7
Youth As Resources Inc

Promote youth-led grant-making, leadership development and community organizing to effect change in Baltimore City.

Youth Development
8
Afya Baltimore Inc

To improve student achievement while promoting health. students at afya will be engaged in physical activity while focusing on the development of their reading, writing, math, science, and social studies skills. afya provides an effective…

Education
9
University of Maryland Medical System Corporation

Umms provides a variety of inpatient/outpatient services to people in the maryland area regardless of their ability to pay. revenues are used to help defray the costs of services.

Health
10
Union Baptist Church School Union Baptist Head Start
11
Health Care for the Homeless Inc

Health care for the homeless works to end homelessness through racially equitable health care, housing and advocacy in partnership with those of us who have experienced it.

12
Caroline Human Services Council Inc

To improve the effectiveness of support services provied by public, non-profit and private agencies to residents of caroline county.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Men's Christian Association of Central Maryland Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lifetime Wells Vision Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChristian Outreach Ministri…Ymca Community CentersYouth Sports ProgramsVolunteer Fire & RescueCommunity Hospital SystemsAnimal Rescue and ShelterJewish Community FederationsChildhood Cancer SupportPregnancy Support Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr16%15%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr11%12%35–55yr16%27%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr16%21%5–10yr19%35%10–20yr16%10%20–35yr11%4%35–55yr16%30%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
14%
5,903/41,823

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

03the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

St Ignatius Loyola Academy — $1,024,000 · OtherSt Ignatius Loyola AcademyHOLY ANGELS CATHOLIC SCHOOL INC — $140,200 · OtherHOLY ANGELS CATHOLIC SCHOOL INCCHRISTIAN UNION CHURCH INC — $138,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN UNION CHURCH INCSISTERS ACADEMY OF BALTIMORE INC — $101,000 · OtherSISTERS ACADEMY OF BALTIMORE INC+37 more — $198,020 · Other+37 morePOSITIVE YOUTH EXPRESSIONS INC — $181,724 · EducationPOSITIVE YOUTH…GOOD SHEPHERD NATIVITY MISSION SCHOOL INC — $75,000 · EducationGOOD SHEPHERD …+1 more — $4,000 · EducationLIFETIME WELLS VISION INC — $100,000 · InternationalTHE CAVANAGH HOUSE — $50,000 · Housing & ShelterUPPERCO VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY INC — $40,000 · Public Safety & DisasterGLYNDON VOLUNTTEER FIRE DEPT INC — $2,000 · Public Safety & DisasterASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC — $32,000 · Human ServicesYoung Men's Christian Association of Central Maryland Inc — $4,600 · Human ServicesTHE ALPHA PREGNANCY CENTER INC — $8,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $2,000 · HealthMt Washington Pediatric Hospital Inc — $1,000 · Health
Other$1,601,220Education$260,724International$100,000Housing & Shelter$50,000Public Safety & Disaster$42,000Human Services$36,600Health$11,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPOSITIVE YOUTH EXPRESSIONS INC — $181,724 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetLIFETIME WELLS VISION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD NATIVITY MISSION SCHOOL INC — $75,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetTHE CAVANAGH HOUSE — $50,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetUPPERCO VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY INC — $40,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC — $32,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS EXPECTING MORE SUCCESS INC — $7,500 over 1y, 31% of budgetBALTIMORE CIVIC FUND INC — $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKIDS CHANCE OF MARYLAND INC — $5,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Central Maryland Inc — $4,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF FRANKLIN HIGH SCHOOL INC — $4,000 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetMETRO-MARYLAND YOUTH FOR CHRIST INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetShoresh Inc — $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUMAR BOXING PROGRAM INC — $2,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetGLYNDON VOLUNTTEER FIRE DEPT INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMt Washington Pediatric Hospital Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING UP MISSION INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDEFENDERS OF ANIMAL RIGHTS INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds POSITIVE YOUTH EXPRESSIONS INC
  • Who funds LIFETIME WELLS VISION INC
  • Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD NATIVITY MISSION SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds THE CAVANAGH HOUSE
  • Who funds UPPERCO VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY INC
  • Who funds ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC
  • Who funds HARFORD FAMILY HOUSE INC
  • Who funds THE ALPHA PREGNANCY CENTER INC
  • Who funds GIRLS EXPECTING MORE SUCCESS INC
  • Who funds BALTIMORE CIVIC FUND INC
  • Who funds KIDS CHANCE OF MARYLAND INC
  • Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Central Maryland Inc
  • Who funds ALUMNI ASSOCIATION OF FRANKLIN HIGH SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds METRO-MARYLAND YOUTH FOR CHRIST INC
  • Who funds Shoresh Inc
  • Who funds UMAR BOXING PROGRAM INC
  • Who funds GLYNDON VOLUNTTEER FIRE DEPT INC
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds Mt Washington Pediatric Hospital Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The United Way of Central Maryland IncMD19.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · Edward St John Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Verizon Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Daniel G & Jean K Schuster Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Daniel G & Jean K Schuster Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $499k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph