Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dana Cheryl Beitscher Charitable Fdn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$292kReligion$182kHealth$37kInternational$4kPhilanthropy$2kFood & Nutrition$1kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kMembership Benefit$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $17k
$4,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$468k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YESHIVA HIGH SCHOOL OF AZ$16,758
TIFERES STAM INC$4,688
CYPRESS CHURCH OF GONZALES$4,000
CONG BETH ISRAEL OF PHOENIX AZ$3,135
YESHIVA SHAAREI TORAH$1,000
Individual grant recipient$180
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 88% of grant dollars ($459k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 12% that went abroad ($61k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $720) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AHAVAS TZEDOKOS: $360 → 11%AHAVAS TZEDOKOS: $180 → 11%AHAVAS TZEDOKES CORP: $180 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
WY
IA
NJ
CA
CO
MD
AZ
TX

Beyond the US: 12% of all-years giving ($61k)

3 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
United Kingdom$40k · 3 grants
Israel$21k · 6 grants
France$1k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$464k · 20 repeat orgs$51k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
57

Total granted

$464k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+43%

Still filing today

30%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationPhilanthropyPublic Safety & DisasterReligionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YH
    YESHIVA HIGH SCHOOL OF ARIZONA
    7× · 2017–2025 · $237k · revenue +285%
  • ST
    SHEARIM TORAH HIGH SCHOOL INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $2k · revenue +67%
  • YD
    YESHIVA DERECH CHAIM
    3× · 2017–2019 · $840 · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • ST
    SCOTTSDALE TORAH CTR AHAVAS TORAH
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Torah Ore Seminary

To promote the furtherance of jewish religious and rabbinic education on a college and graduate level in israel and to increase the dissemination of scholarly research works in the fields of torah, talmud and halacha.

Education
2
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
3
The Chasdei Shimon Foundation
Religion
4
American Friends of Dvar Shalom

Support advanced educational and religious institution in israel.

Philanthropy
5
Shaare Mordechai Inc

The organization's primary mission is charitable and religious in nature, supporting judaic and rabbinical education by providing financial assistance to institutions of jewish learning, currently through grants to shaare mordechai in…

Religion
6
Yeshiva Yismach Moshe

Raise funds for religious and educational institutions in the state of israel, and to provide funds to needy individuals in the state of israel.

International
7
Keren Hayeshivot Trust

Keren hayeshivot trust supports religious institutions of higher education in the united states and israel to raise the level of torah and halachic observance in the sephardic orthodox jewish community.

Philanthropy
8
American Friends of Daas Aharon Inc

To promote, assist, and sponsor the spreading of Jewish religious education in Israel. The organization will also organize inspirational gatherings in the USA to enhance the participants' Torah knowledge.

Education
9
Kemach Usa Inc

To support the haredi community in israel. the haredi community is commonly referred to as ultra-orthodox jews. it is estimated that over 50% of haredi children live below the poverty line. the organization accomplishes this by providing…

International
10
Keren Hayeshivot Fund Inc

Keren hayeshivot fund supports religious institutions of higher education in the united states and israel to raise the level of torah and halachic observance in the sephardic orthodox jewish community.

Philanthropy
11
Chasdei Ish Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Yad Vashem Usa Foundation

Yad vashem usa foundation (the organization) is dedicated to support the memorialization and awareness of, and education regarding, the holocaust, as currently overseen, supervised and conducted by yad vashem, the holocaust martyrs and…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shearim Torah High School Inc; the most unlike its peers is Jewish National Fund (Keren Kayemeth Leisrael) Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MT SINAI CONG OF CHEYENNE: $43,800 · OtherMT SINAI CONG OF CHEYENNETHE KUKLVA BOOK ACCOUNT: $38,600 · OtherTHE KUKLVA BOOK ACCOUNTMT SINAI CONG OF CHEYENNE WY: $30,640 · OtherMT SINAI CONG OF CHEYENNE WYAHAVAS TORAH: $30,500 · OtherAHAVAS TORAHCONG BETH ISRAEL OF PHOENIX AZ: $30,390 · OtherCONG BETH ISRAEL OF PHOENIX AZIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCYPRESS CHURCH OF GONZALES INC: $14,000 · OtherSCOTTSDALE TORAH CTR AHAVAS TORAH: $10,000 · Other+60 more: $55,329 · Other+60 moreYESHIVA HIGH SCHOOL OF ARIZONA: $237,077 · EducationYESHIVA HIGH SCHOOL OF ARIZONA+1 more: $2,000 · EducationTHE MILTON H ERICKSON FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · HealthEHLERS-DANLOS SOCIETY: $1,000 · HealthDYSAUTONOMIA INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 · HealthJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $3,600 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF RAMAT BET SHEMESH INC: $180 · InternationalJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $1,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH CHARITY REVIEW INC: $360 · PhilanthropyCHASDEI MEIR INC: $180 · PhilanthropyWest Coast Vaad Hachesed: $1,260 · ReligionPHOENIX POLICE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Public Safety & DisasterAHAVAS TZEDOKOS CORP: $720 · Human Services
Other$268,259Education$239,077Health$4,000International$3,780Philanthropy$1,540Religion$1,260Public Safety & Disaster$1,000Human Services$720

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYESHIVA HIGH SCHOOL OF ARIZONA: $237,077 over 7y, 7.8% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $3,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MILTON H ERICKSON FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSHEARIM TORAH HIGH SCHOOL INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWest Coast Vaad Hachesed: $1,260 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHADD INC CHILDREN AND ADULTS WITH ATTENTION DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEHLERS-DANLOS SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLYMEDISEASEORG: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPHOENIX POLICE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetDYSAUTONOMIA INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA DERECH CHAIM: $840 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAHAVAS TZEDOKOS CORP: $720 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH CHARITY REVIEW INC: $360 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF RAMAT BET SHEMESH INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHASDEI MEIR INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YESHIVA HIGH SCHOOL OF ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MILTON H ERICKSON FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SHEARIM TORAH HIGH SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds West Coast Vaad Hachesed ↗
  • Who funds CHADD INC CHILDREN AND ADULTS WITH ATTENTION DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds EHLERS-DANLOS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds LYMEDISEASEORG ↗
  • Who funds PHOENIX POLICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DYSAUTONOMIA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA DERECH CHAIM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY18.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · The Zev and Susan Munk Family Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Aj & Sl Stern Family Foundation · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · The Setton Foundation · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · AbbVie Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dana Cheryl Beitscher Charitable Fdn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dana Cheryl Beitscher Charitable Fdn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 31%
  • Chadd Inc Children and Adults With Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: 31% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Dana Cheryl Beitscher Charitable Fdn?

Find your warmest path to Dana Cheryl Beitscher Charitable Fdn through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 81 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dana Cheryl Beitscher Charitable Fdn’s filings →

More from the funding graph