Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Dan & Jeanne Scott Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
78
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.

Human Services$1.1MPhilanthropy$680kEducation$584kYouth Development$412kFood & Nutrition$340kRecreation & Sports$324kHealth$254kHousing & Shelter$243kOther$0
02FY2024 · 78 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k54 grants · $85k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $283k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $608k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$27M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Homer & Mildred Scott Foundation$250,000
Yellowstone Valley Animal Shelter$106,000
Tongue River Valley Community Center$100,500
Volunteers of America$100,000
YWCA$51,000
Montana Stock Growers Association$50,000
Wyoming Stock Growers Endowment Trust$50,000
Green House Living$50,000
Help Center Inc$50,000
Habitat for Humanity of the Eastern Bighorns$50,000
Thrive$41,000
Bozeman Schools Foundation$40,000
Montana State University$35,263
Sheridan Memorial Hospital Foundation$25,450
Wyoming Agricultural Leadership Council$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $570k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 3% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Wise Place: $1k → 10%Pathways Hospice: $200 → 11%Russell Wilson Foundation: $750 → 9%Wyoming Cares: $1k → 11%Family Promise of Gallatin Valley: $50k → 10%Wise Place: $1k → 10%Tongue River Child's Place: $15k → 10%Help Center Inc: $50k → 10%Wise Place: $500 → 10%Wyoming Cares: $300 → 11%Wise Place: $500 → 10%Tongue River Child's Place: $11k → 10%Wyoming Cares: $300 → 11%Tongue River Child's Place: $11k → 10%Tongue River Child's Place: $10k → 10%Tongue River Child's Place: $10k → 10%Tongue River Child's Place: $10k → 10%Kherut: $750 → 10%Child Development Center: $50k → 10%Community Leadership Development Inc: $10k → 9%Community Leadership Development Inc: $10k → 9%Billings Family YMCA: $5k → 9%Patriots and Paws: $11k → 10%Global Hope 365: $500 → 10%KherUT: $1k → 10%Billings Family YMCA: $1k → 9%Billings Family YMCA: $1k → 9%Billings Family YMCA: $1k → 9%Billings Family YMCA: $1k → 9%Tumbleweed: $400 → 9%Yellowstone Boys & Girls Ranch Foundation: $40k → 9%Senior Citizens Council: $123k → 10%Senior Citizens Council: $43k → 10%Senior Citizens Council: $33k → 10%Tumbleweed: $36k → 9%Tumbleweed: $6k → 9%Tumbleweed: $4k → 9%Senior Citizens Council: $10k → 10%Senior Citizens Council: $4k → 10%Senior Citizens Council: $3k → 10%Sheridan Foster Parent Exchange: $1k → 10%Sheridan Foster Parent Exchange: $500 → 10%Sheridan Foster Parent Exchange: $500 → 10%Sheridan Foster Parent Exchange: $250 → 10%Sheridan Foster Parent Exchange: $250 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
MT
MN
WI
WY
SD
IN
CA
CO
AZ
NM
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.9M · 85 repeat orgs$809k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against -6% for the ones you funded once.

85 repeat relationships — 57 still active in FY2024, 28 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

85
39

Total granted

$3.9M
$412k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
-6%

Still filing today

60%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $396k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationAnimalsReligionCrime & LegalEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    TONGUE RIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTER
    6× · 2019–2024 · $378k · revenue +21%
  • TI
    THRIVE INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $311k · revenue +2%
  • SC
    SENIOR CITIZEN COUNCIL
    6× · 2019–2024 · $216k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • FP
    FAMILY PROMISE OF GALLATIN VALLEY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +30%
  • CD
    CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -6%
  • SC
    SHERIDAN COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue -30%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wyoming Wildlife Advocates

To promote science-based wildlife management that fosters ecosystem health and dynamic equilibrium between species throughout the state of wyoming.

Animals
2
Wyoming County Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Provide shelter, food, medical care and adoption services to abused, neglected, homeless and abandoned animals.

Animals
3
The Wyldlife Fund

To unite people to advance wyoming wildlife habitat, research, and education.

Animals
4
Better Wyoming

Better wyoming works to educate, organize and mobilize wyoming residents on behalf of statewide change.

Public Benefit
5
Wyldflower Learning Community Inc

To provide students a learning environment where they can develop independence, cultivate passions, and grow the skill sets needed to be successful and fulfilled in life

—
6
Montana Wilderness School

The mission of the montana wilderness school is to provide empowering expeditionary wilderness courses to youth that foster personal growth and cultivate a conservation ethic through connecting with remote landscapes and wild places.

Environment
7
Cowboy State Daily

Cowboy state daily's mission is to provide high-quality local and statewide reporting on the issues that impact wyoming, featuring stories that capture wyoming's wonderful "small town with long streets" vibe.

Arts & Culture
8
Wyoming State Fair Foundation

To ensure that the Wyoming State Fair serves as a vibrant celebration of our states agriculture, youth, education, heritage, and industry, while evolving to meet the needs of future generations. WSFF is the fundraising arm of the WSF,…

Recreation & Sports
9
Wyoming Early Childhood Partnership

The mission and purpose of the wyoming early childhood partnership is to lead a public-private partnership in the development of an accessible and sustainable, high quality, early childhood system that supports communities and families.

—
10
Wyoming Sheep Foundation
Food & Nutrition
11
Wyoming Outdoor Council

The wyoming outdoor council's mission is to protect wyoming's environment and quality of life now and for future generations.

Environment
12
Wyoming Wildlife Federation

Wyoming wildlife federation delivers leadership in conservation for the state's wildlife, hunters, anglers, and conservationists through policy, education, advocacy, and habitat.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Volunteers of America Northern Rockies and the most unlike its peers is Evelyn Cameron Heritage Inc Evelyn Cameron Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyDiverse Community ServicesEducational & Research Fund…Youth Sports and Arts Boost…Mental Health & Wellness Se…Private Charitable Foundati…Animal Rescue and Shelter S…Child & Family Support Serv…Montana Recreation and Comm…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%6%<5yr13%8%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr13%19%20–35yr15%24%35–55yr16%18%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%0%<5yr13%2%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr13%21%20–35yr15%36%35–55yr16%18%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1.0%1/101
the rest of the field
10%
543/5,216

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

95 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 95 of the 146 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
24
Early backer (in before they grew)
92/95
Grantees still filing
55/95
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Homer & Mildred Scott Foundation — $500,000 · OtherHomer & Mildred Scott FoundationTHRIVE INC — $311,100 · OtherTHRIVE INCIndividual grant recipient — $157,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMontana State University — $116,789 · OtherSheridan Memorial Hospital Foundation — $106,550 · OtherGreen House Living — $104,700 · OtherMONTANA RESCUE MISSION — $100,000 · OtherVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA NORTHERN ROCKIES — $100,000 · Other+88 more — $1,407,750 · Other+88 moreSENIOR CITIZEN COUNCIL — $215,900 · Human ServicesSENIOR CITIZEN…TONGUE RIVER CHILDS PLACE — $67,250 · Human ServicesTONGUE RIVER C…FAMILY SERVICE — $60,250 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICEFAMILY PROMISE OF GALLATIN VALLEY INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE…CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesCHILD DEVELOPM…HELP CENTER INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesHELP CENTER IN…TUMBLEWEED RUNAWAY PROGRAM INC — $47,100 · Human ServicesTUMBLEWEED RUN…YELLOWSTONE BOYS AND GIRLS RANCH FOUNDAT — $40,000 · Human ServicesYELLOWSTONE BO…+11 more — $52,100 · Human Services+11 moreTONGUE RIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTER — $377,750 · Community ImprovementROCKY MOUNTAIN COLLEGE — $155,500 · EducationNorthern Wyoming Community College Foundation — $60,000 · EducationSHERIDAN HIGH SCHOOL BOOSTER CLUB — $25,650 · EducationSTORY COMMUNITY LIBRARY INC — $25,000 · EducationROOTED IN WYOMING — $10,000 · Education+8 more — $14,300 · EducationANTELOPE BUTTE FOUNDATION INC — $152,500 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS MONTANA INC — $75,500 · Recreation & SportsSHERIDAN ON SKATES — $26,000 · Recreation & SportsYELLOWSTONE VALLEY ANIMAL SHELTER — $161,000 · AnimalsDOG & CAT SHELTER INC — $36,500 · Animals+9 more — $16,850 · AnimalsSHERIDAN COMMUNITY LAND TRUST — $100,750 · EnvironmentWYOMING NATURAL RESOURCE FOUNDATION — $6,000 · Environment+1 more — $1,400 · Environment
Other$2,903,889Human Services$632,600Community Improvement$377,750Education$290,450Recreation & Sports$254,000Animals$214,350Environment$108,150

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTONGUE RIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTER — $377,750 over 6y, 18% of budgetTHRIVE INC — $311,100 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetSENIOR CITIZEN COUNCIL — $215,900 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetYELLOWSTONE VALLEY ANIMAL SHELTER — $161,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN COLLEGE — $155,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetANTELOPE BUTTE FOUNDATION INC — $152,500 over 6y, 8.1% of budgetSHERIDAN COMMUNITY LAND TRUST — $100,750 over 6y, 4.4% of budgetMONTANA RESCUE MISSION — $100,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA NORTHERN ROCKIES — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE FOOD GROUP INC — $92,750 over 5y, 5.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE EASTERN BIGHORNS INC — $90,000 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MONTANA INC — $75,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTONGUE RIVER CHILDS PLACE — $67,250 over 6y, 4.5% of budgetBILLINGS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $65,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE — $60,250 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetNorthern Wyoming Community College Foundation — $60,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GALLATIN VALLEY INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTHE MONTANA STOCKGROWERS ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED — $50,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetHELP CENTER INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSHERIDAN KIDS LIFE — $50,000 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetWYOMING STOCK GROWERS ENDOWMENT TRUST — $50,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetRIMROCK FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTUMBLEWEED RUNAWAY PROGRAM INC — $47,100 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetCOMPASS CENTER FOR FAMILIES — $41,700 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetYELLOWSTONE BOYS AND GIRLS RANCH FOUNDAT — $40,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDOG & CAT SHELTER INC — $36,500 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetSHERIDAN ON SKATES — $26,000 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetSHERIDAN HIGH SCHOOL BOOSTER CLUB — $25,650 over 2y, 12% of budgetBIG SKY YOUTH EMPOWERMENT PROJECT INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetFRIENDSHIP HOUSE OF CHRISTIAN SERVICE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSTORY COMMUNITY LIBRARY INC — $25,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetWYOMING AGRICULTURAL LEADERSHIP COUNCIL — $25,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetBILLINGS EXCHANGE CLUBS CHILD ABUSE — $25,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetWYOMING AGRICULTURE IN THE CLASSROOM — $23,500 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetJOEY'S FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY LEADERSHIP & DEVELOPMENT INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCAMP BETHEL INC — $16,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetROSE PARK PTA — $15,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF MONTANA SHAKESPEARE IN THE PARKS — $15,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetWYOMING STOCK GROWERS LAND TRUST — $12,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPATRIOTS AND PAWS — $10,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEVELYN CAMERON HERITAGE INC EVELYN CAMERON FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetROOTED IN WYOMING — $10,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetBILLINGS FAMILY YMCA INC — $9,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetRAMSEY KELLER MEMORIAL — $8,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetSafe Passage — $7,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWYOMING NATURAL RESOURCE FOUNDATION — $6,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TONGUE RIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THRIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR CITIZEN COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds YELLOWSTONE VALLEY ANIMAL SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ANTELOPE BUTTE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SHERIDAN COMMUNITY LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds MONTANA RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA NORTHERN ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE EASTERN BIGHORNS INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MONTANA INC ↗
  • Who funds TONGUE RIVER CHILDS PLACE ↗
  • Who funds BILLINGS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds Northern Wyoming Community College Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF GALLATIN VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MONTANA STOCKGROWERS ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds HELP CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SHERIDAN COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SHERIDAN KIDS LIFE ↗
  • Who funds WYOMING STOCK GROWERS ENDOWMENT TRUST ↗
  • Who funds RIMROCK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TUMBLEWEED RUNAWAY PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds COMPASS CENTER FOR FAMILIES ↗
  • Who funds YELLOWSTONE BOYS AND GIRLS RANCH FOUNDAT ↗
  • Who funds DOG & CAT SHELTER INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First Interstate Banc…Homer A Scott & Mildr…Montana Community Fou…Wyoming Community Fou…Homer A Jr & Janet Sc…Joe and Arlene Watt F…Dennis & Phyllis Wash…Bf & Rose H Perkins F…The Seidler FoundationGianforte Family Char…Chandler H Kibbee and…Charles M Bair Family…
First Interstate BancSystem Foundation IncMT73.5× affinity49 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Homer A Scott & Mildred S Scott Foundation · Montana Community Foundation Inc · Wyoming Community Foundation · Homer A Jr & Janet Scott Family Foundation · Joe and Arlene Watt Foundation Inc · Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation · Bf & Rose H Perkins Foundation · The Seidler Foundation · Gianforte Family Charitable Trust · Chandler H Kibbee and Mercedes K Kibbee Foundation for Children · Charles M Bair Family Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dan & Jeanne Scott Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Dan & Jeanne Scott Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Dan & Jeanne Scott Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 146 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines