· Private foundation
Dan and Stacey Case Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k24 grants · $68k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $264k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $336k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HOOVER INSTITUTION | $100,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SF | $65,000 |
| AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY | $60,000 |
| NEW YORK CITY BALLET | $59,550 |
| MARIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $51,669 |
| GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVANCY | $30,150 |
| EXPLORATORIUM | $25,000 |
| CPMC FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $25,000 |
| ALUMNI AND FRIENDS OF THE LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS IN THE USA | $25,000 |
| PATH NORTH LEADERSHIP COUNCIL | $25,000 |
| FINE ARTS MUSEUMS OF SAN FRANCISCO | $23,250 |
| HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL | $20,000 |
| SAN FRANCISCO BALLET | $15,000 |
| UCSF FOUNDATION | $11,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
76 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2025, 46 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $52k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
The Trustees of Princeton University7× · 2017–2023 · $346k · revenue +5%- CPCALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION7× · 2017–2025 · $267k · revenue +32%
- NYNEW YORK CITY BALLET INC3× · 2022–2025 · $202k · revenue +20%
Funded once
- TSTHE SAPLING FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +911%
- THTHE HELIX SCHOOLgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +40%
- TFTRAILS FOREVER- GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVANCYone grant, 2017 · $16k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.
The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…
A private school that cultivates and celebrates the intellectual, imaginative, and humanitarian promise of each student in a community that practices mutual respect, embraces diversity, and inspires passion for learning.
Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
At san francisco friends school, students learn in a community grounded in the quaker values of reflection, integrity, peaceful problem-solving and stewardship. our teachers challenge students with a dynamic curriculum that inspires…
The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.
The bar association of san francisco champions equal access to justice and promotes humanity, excellence, and diversity in the legal profession. we provide legal services to disadvantaged and underserved individuals in san francisco. we…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.
To educate and inspire girls to become innovators and leaders in stem.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The San Francisco Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Shree Saint Baba Mehardas Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
100 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 100 of the 162 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE EXPLORATORIUM ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK CITY BALLET INC ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE BRANSON SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds ACCELERATE BRAIN CANCER CURE INC ↗
- Who funds GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMON SENSE MEDIA ↗
- Who funds MARIN GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CALIBER PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds MARIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SUMMER SEARCH ↗
- Who funds THE GARDEN CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds Sonoma Valley Authors Festival ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS ↗
- Who funds ALUMNI AND FRIENDS OF THE LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds THE SAPLING FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PATHNORTH INC ↗
- Who funds THE HELIX SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Neighbors for a Better San Francisco ↗
- Who funds The Cancer League Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Bessemer Giving Fund · Swig Foundation · Lisa & Douglas Goldman Fund · Sonoma County Community Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · McNabb Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Dan and Stacey Case Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Dan and Stacey Case Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Dan and Stacey Case Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.