Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Dan and Pat Nelson Family Foundation

Its FY2018 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2k
Granted FY2018
1
Grants FY2018
1
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172018.

Recreation & Sports$60kReligion$30kPhilanthropy$25kArts & Culture$16kHuman Services$15kYouth Development$15kFood & Nutrition$11kEducation$10kOther$0
02FY2018 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,182
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$2,182
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%CANCER PATHWAYS: $5k → 9%NORTHWEST FURNITURE BANK: $10k → 9%WISHING WELL FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nourish Pierce County

To provide food to individuals in need with compassion, dignity and respect. No one needing assistance is turned away.

2
Family Promise of Pierce County

To empower families experiencing housing insecurity through intervention, prevention,and stabilization services.

Housing & Shelter
3
Northwest Fair Housing Alliance

The mission of the Northwest Fair Housing Alliance is to eliminate housing discrimination and to ensure equal housing opportunity for the people of Washington State through education, counseling and advocacy.

Civil Rights
4
Puyallup Food Bank

We are passionate about meeting the urgent needs of our neighbors and partnering to assist them, believing food is the first step on their journey to a more hopeful future!

Human Services
5
Northwest Film Forum

Northwest Film Forum incites public dialogue and creative action through collective cinematic experiences. A nonprofit film and arts center located in Seattle, Northwest Film Forum presents hundreds of films, festivals, community events,…

Arts & Culture
6
House Our Neighbors

House Our Neighbors envisions a future where all people can afford to live and thrive in vibrant, cohesive, and climate resilient communities. To achieve this, we develop, advocate, and mobilize for policy to realize social housing for the…

7
Port Townsend School of Wood- working

To inspire a lifelong passion for craftmanship through education in woodworking and traditional building trades.

Education
8
Skagit Habitat for Humanity

The organization partners with hard working people in need of affordable housing, by building and renovating houses in an effort to develop permanent, affordable homes for low income families within Skagit County. We also provide volunteer…

9
Community Foundation of Snohomish County

The Community Foundation of Snohomish County (the Foundation) is a nonprofit, tax-exempt organization incorporated under the laws of the State of Washington. The Foundation serves as a community foundation, supporting a broad spectrum of…

Philanthropy
10
Great Peninsula Conservancy

Preserve in perpetuity the natural habitats, rural landscapes, and open spaces of the great peninsula of washington's puget sound.

Environment
11
Port Angeles Food Bank

Nourishing our community. the port angeles food bank is the main food bank in clallam county, providing food to 13 other area pantries and meal programs as well as providing food to over 5,000 individuals per month.

Food & Nutrition
12
Homeward Bound in Puyallup

Homeward bound in puyallup will bring individuals, groups and partners together to deliver services and resources to eliminate involuntary homelessness in pierce county, washington. homeward bound in puyallup sees a day when the community…

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwest Harvest Emm and the most unlike its peers is Toy Rescue Mission. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

YMCA OF PIERCE AND KITSAP COUNTY — $50,000 · OtherYMCA OF PIERCE AND KITSAP COUNTYTHE MUSTARD SEED PROJECT — $30,000 · OtherTHE MUSTARD SEED PROJECTGIRLS ON THE RUN — $14,000 · OtherGIRLS ON THE RUNNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM — $11,000 · OtherNORTHWEST HARVEST EMMCAMP AGAPE — $5,000 · Other+2 more — $2,682 · OtherTOY RESCUE MISSION — $25,000 · PhilanthropyTOY RESCUE MIS…NW FURNITURE BANK — $10,000 · Human ServicesNW FURNITUR…WISHING WELL FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Human ServicesWISHING WEL…Cancer Pathways — $5,000 · Human ServicesCancer Path…GIG HARBOR FILM FESTIVAL — $10,500 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF PENINSULA — $10,250 · Youth DevelopmentFIRST TEE OF SOUTH PUGET SOUND — $5,000 · Recreation & SportsHILLTOP ARTISTS IN RESIDENCE — $5,000 · EducationTACOMAPIERCE COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANIT — $5,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$112,682Philanthropy$25,000Human Services$20,000Arts & Culture$10,500Youth Development$10,250Recreation & Sports$5,000Education$5,000Housing & Shelter$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM — $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIG HARBOR FILM FESTIVAL — $10,500 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF PENINSULA — $10,250 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetNW FURNITURE BANK — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFIRST TEE OF SOUTH PUGET SOUND — $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWISHING WELL FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetHILLTOP ARTISTS IN RESIDENCE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTACOMAPIERCE COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANIT — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gary E Milgard Family Foundation- SunshineWA22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gary E Milgard Family Foundation- Sunshine · Greater Tacoma Community Foundation · The Bamford Foundation · Names Family Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Sequoia Foundation · Woodworth Family Foundation · Ben B Cheney Foundation Inc · The Russell Family Foundation · The Baker Foundation · DeFalco Family Foundation Inc · LT Murray Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dan and Pat Nelson Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph