Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dale & Janice Davis Johnston Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$142k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$46k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$239kHuman Services$220kPhilanthropy$135kHealth$129kEducation$104kReligion$68kInternational$47kHousing & Shelter$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $116k
$3,500
Median grant
10
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE NATIONAL WWII MUSEUM$46,000
JDRF$15,000
GARY SINISE FOUNDATION$15,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$10,000
THE V FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH$10,000
TUNNEL TO TOWER FOUNDATION$10,000
ST FRANCIS HOUSE$10,000
ST MARKS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$5,700
HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS$5,000
NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY$3,500
CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION$3,500
LITTLE ROCK COMPASSION CENTER$1,500
EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT$1,000
PARISH EPISCOPAL SCHOOL$1,000
ST VINCENTS BREAST CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $2k → 17%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $1k → 17%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $1k → 17%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $1k → 17%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $1k → 17%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $1k → 17%EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $1k → 17%ARKANSAS HOSPICE: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
PA
CA
MO
VA
MD
AR
NC
DC
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$948k · 23 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
5

Total granted

$948k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+12%

Still filing today

52%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyReligionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GARY SINISE FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $145k · revenue +196%
  • SF
    ST FRANCIS HOUSE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $75k · revenue +348%
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $50k · revenue +392%

Funded once

  • A
    AICR
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • AA
    ARKANSAS ASSOCIATION OF BLACK PSYCHOLOGY PROFESSIONALS
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • AI
    A-CAMP INC
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
2
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
3
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
4
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
5
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
6
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
7
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
8
Blood Cancer United Inc

Our mission is to cure leukemia, lymphoma, hodgkin's disease and myeloma, and improve the quality of life of patients and their families.

Health
9
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
10
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
11
Marc Lustgarten Pancreatic Cancer Foundation

The lustgarten foundation is the largest private funder of pancreatic cancer research in the world. see schedule o.the lustgarten foundation is boldly leading the way through hope and innovation, turning fear into action through education…

Human Services
12
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Homes for Our Troops Inc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE NATIONAL WWII MUSEUM: $227,000 · OtherTHE NATIONAL WWII MUSEUMJDRF: $125,500 · OtherJDRFST FRANCIS HOUSE INC: $75,000 · OtherST FRANCIS HOUSE INCST MARKS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $47,400 · OtherST MARKS EPISCOPAL CHURCHNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $30,000 · OtherNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY+13 more: $51,000 · Other+13 moreGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $145,000 · PhilanthropyGARY SINISE FOUN…CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $39,000 · HealthCYSTIC FIB…THE V FOUNDATION: $30,000 · HealthTHE V FOUN…BREAKTHROUGH T1D: $15,000 · HealthBREAKTHROU…AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH: $10,000 · HealthAMERICAN I…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SI…UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $42,700 · EducationUNIVERSITY…SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $47,000 · ReligionHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterEPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $8,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 · Human ServicesARKANSAS HOSPICE INC: $500 · Human ServicesK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $1,000 · Animals
Other$555,900Philanthropy$145,000Health$94,000Education$92,700Religion$47,000Housing & Shelter$25,000Human Services$13,500Animals$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $145,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetST FRANCIS HOUSE INC: $75,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $47,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $42,700 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $39,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $8,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPARISH EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetA-CAMP INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARKANSAS HOSPICE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST FRANCIS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE V FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds PARISH EPISCOPAL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds A-CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds K9S FOR WARRIORS INC ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS HOSPICE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arkansas Community Foundation IncAR13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dale & Janice Davis Johnston Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dale & Janice Davis Johnston Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dale & Janice Davis Johnston Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph