Skip to content

· Private foundation

D & M Genzman Family Foundation Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$97k
Granted FY2024still arriving
29
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Human Services$209kHealth$139kEducation$68kAnimals$19kRecreation & Sports$15kArts & Culture$15kHousing & Shelter$14kPhilanthropy$14kOther$0
02FY2024 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k27 grants · $72k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
$2,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$15,000
SAMARITANS PURSE$10,000
SHRINERS HOSPITAL$6,000
ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH$6,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES$6,000
TRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION$5,000
DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS$4,500
SPECIAL OLYMPICS OHIO$4,500
PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA$4,500
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$3,000
THE SALVATION ARMY - FREMONT$3,000
SUNSHINE CHILDREN'S HOME$2,500
UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATION$2,500
TOLEDO NORTHWESTERN OHIO FOOD BANK$2,000
EASTER SEALS$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NY
OH
PA
MO
KY
WV
VA
TN
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$540k · 32 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against -40% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
3

Total granted

$540k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
-40%

Still filing today

44%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPublic BenefitHousing & ShelterEducationFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $45k · revenue +83%
  • TRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $30k · revenue +19%
  • DA
    Disabled American Veterans
    5× · 2019–2024 · $22k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • HP
    HAYES PRESIDENTAL LIBRARY
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • F9
    FLIGHT 93 NATIONAL MEMORIAL
    one grant, 2019 · $500
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF FLIGHT 93 NATIONAL MEMOR
    one grant, 2018 · $500 · revenue -40%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Troopers for a Safer Ohio

Supporting & advocating -laws that make ohio's highways safer for the driving public -legislation that improves the state's criminal justice system -public policy that enhances the law enforcement profession…

Employment
2
Homes for Veterans a Nj Non Profit Corporation

Our mission is to provide a holistic approach to support veterans with disabilities by removing barriers in every aspect of their lives. this includes funding customized, barrier-free home modificationssuch as wheelchair-accessible…

Housing & Shelter
3
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
4
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
5
Soldiers of America
Human Services
6
Amvets (American Veterans)

Amvets is a veterans service organization whose members, having served or now serving in the u.s. armed forces, are united to uphold and defend the constitution of the united states; to safeguard the principles of freedom, liberty and…

—
7
Special Ops Survivors

Special ops survivors advances the mission "to embrace and empower surviving spouses of fallen special operations heroes to build healthy post-loss futures as they transition and rebuild their new lives." the foundation provides programs…

Human Services
8
Uso Foundation

The mission of the uso foundation (foundation) is to support uso inc.'s (uso) mission to strengthen the well-being of the people serving in america's military and their families.

—
9
Military Officers Association of America

Preserve and protect earned benefits for our uniformed services, veterans, their families, and surviving spouses through advocacy, leadership, education and service. provide first-class service to our members. we are the leading voice on…

Public Benefit
10
United Way Worldwide

To improve lives by mobilizing caring power of communities around the world to advance common good.

Philanthropy
11
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
12
The Veterans and First Responders
Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mh Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH: $41,000 · OtherST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCHRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES: $41,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIESSHRINERS HOSPITAL: $38,000 · OtherSHRINERS HOSPITALTHE SALVATION ARMY - FREMONT: $27,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY - FREMONTSUNSHINE CHILDREN'S HOME: $23,000 · OtherSUNSHINE CHILDREN'S HOMEDisabled American Veterans: $22,000 · OtherDisabled American VeteransSPECIAL OLYMPICS OHIO INC: $15,000 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH OF OHIO: $14,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF SANDUSKY COUNTY INC: $14,000 · OtherMH Foundation Inc: $12,500 · Other+17 more: $113,450 · Other+17 morePARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $42,000 · HealthPARALYZED V…American Diabetes Association: $12,000 · HealthAmerican Di…TRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Public BenefitTRAVIS MI…UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $17,000 · Public BenefitUNITED SE…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $45,000 · EducationSTEPHEN S…CHERRY STREET MISSION MINISTRIES: $14,000 · Housing & ShelterLiberty Center of Sandusky County: $7,000 · Housing & ShelterTOLEDO NORTHWESTERN OHIO FOOD BANK: $12,000 · Food & NutritionHumane Society of Sandusky County: $12,000 · Animals
Other$360,950Health$54,000Public Benefit$47,000Education$45,000Housing & Shelter$21,000Food & Nutrition$12,000Animals$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $42,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetDisabled American Veterans: $22,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $17,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS OHIO INC: $15,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCHERRY STREET MISSION MINISTRIES: $14,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SANDUSKY COUNTY INC: $14,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetMH Foundation Inc: $12,500 over 3y, 40% of budgetTOLEDO NORTHWESTERN OHIO FOOD BANK: $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHumane Society of Sandusky County: $12,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $10,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLiberty Center of Sandusky County: $7,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF FLIGHT 93 NATIONAL MEMOR: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds TRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Disabled American Veterans ↗
  • Who funds UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS OHIO INC ↗
  • Who funds CHERRY STREET MISSION MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF SANDUSKY COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds MH Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds TOLEDO NORTHWESTERN OHIO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds Humane Society of Sandusky County ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds Liberty Center of Sandusky County ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF FLIGHT 93 NATIONAL MEMOR ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization D & M Genzman Family Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from D & M Genzman Family Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on D & M Genzman Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph