Skip to content

· Private foundation

D'Agostino Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$214k
Granted FY2026still arriving
17
Grants FY2026still arriving
5
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2026.

Animals$486kHealth$463kReligion$291kHuman Services$217kEducation$50kCrime & Legal$23kFood & Nutrition$8k
02FY2026 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k5 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $184k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CARING FIELDS FELINES$45,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$20,000
TREASURE COAST HOSPICE$20,000
CHURCH OF ST PATRICK$13,750
SISTERS OF LIFE$11,750
THE VISITATION MONASTERY$11,750
LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR$11,750
FOR OUR FRIENDS INC$10,000
A TAIL TO TELL INC$10,000
THE VAN DUZER FOUNDATION INC$10,000
MUTTVILLE$10,000
COBIE'S COTTAGE INC$10,000
PACKER COLLEGIATE INSTITUTE$8,000
COUNCIL ON AGING OF MARTIN COUNTY$7,000
MOLLY'S HOUSE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–26, $54k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $9k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $8k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $7k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $6k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $5k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $5k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $5k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $5k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $3k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 24 repeat orgs$78k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +62% since the first grant, against -89% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2026, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
4

Total granted

$1.5M
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
-89%

Still filing today

54%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
HealthAnimalsSocial ScienceHuman ServicesEducationCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CARING FIELDS FELINES INC
    10× · 2017–2026 · $290k · revenue +149%
  • TC
    THE COUNCIL ON AGING OF MARTIN COUNTY INC
    10× · 2017–2026 · $137k · revenue +62%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    8× · 2019–2026 · $91k · revenue +99%

Funded once

  • TG
    TAMPA GEN HOSP FDN
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • SC
    STJUDE'S CHILDREN RESEARCH HOSPITA
    one grant, 2018 · $23k
  • SP
    SAINT PETER FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2025 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
2
Animal Care and Control of New York City Inc

Animal care centers of nyc's (acc) mission is to end animal homelessness in nyc.

Animals
3
Animal Adoption Foundation

Aaf is a no kill shelter for domestic animals that have been abused and abandoned. aaf provides and coordinates adoption, spay/nueter, and educational programs, which aim to reduce and control pet population. aaf maintains temporary…

Animals
4
Humane Society of Manatee County

The humane society of manatee county leads the community in fostering compassion and respect for animals through quality care, education, and advocacy to improve the lives of animals and strengthen the human-animal bond.

Animals
5
Humane Animal Partners

Founded in 2023, humane animal partners is a nonprofit no-kill animal care and adoption center. we are committed to providing for the needs of homeless and owned dogs and cats in our community. we make "friends for life" by connecting…

Animals
6
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
7
Animal Coalition of Tampa Inc
Animals
8
Divine Canines

Divine canines therapy encourages smiles and brightens lives. to accomplish this, we recruit and train teams of dogs and their owners and organize and facilitate regular, frequent visits to residents of special care facilities.

Animals
9
Animal Rescue Force Inc

Established in 1974, the organization's mission is to find responsible homes for dogs and cats and to encourage all dog and cat owners to spay and neuter their pets.

Animals
10
Humane Society of Vero Beach and Indian River County Inc

None

Animals
11
Tenth Life Cat Rescue

Tenth life provides veterinary care, foster homes, and adoptive placement to stray cats and kittens, prioritizing those with special needs. the organization works to end unnecessary euthanasia and cat homelessness through educational…

Youth Development
12
Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Caring Voice Coalition Inc; the most unlike its peers is A Tail to Tell Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE COUNCIL ON AGING OF MARTIN COUNTY INC: $137,000 · OtherTHE COUNCIL ON AGING OF MARTIN COUNTY INCTREASURE COAST HOSPICE: $105,000 · OtherTREASURE COAST HOSPICECHURCH OF ST PATRICK: $89,250 · OtherCHURCH OF ST PATRICKSISTERS OF LIFE: $70,750 · OtherSISTERS OF LIFELITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $65,250 · OtherLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOROUR LADY OF MT CARMEL: $55,500 · OtherOUR LADY OF MT CARMELIndividual grant recipient: $43,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientINDIAN RIVER MED CENTER FDTN: $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $39,000 · OtherMOLLY'S HOUSE INC: $33,000 · Other+8 more: $123,750 · Other+8 moreCARING FIELDS FELINES INC: $290,000 · Social ScienceCARING FIELDS FELINES…FOR OUR FRIENDS INC: $64,250 · AnimalsFOR OUR FRIEN…MUTTVILLE: $61,000 · AnimalsMUTTVILLEA TAIL TO TELL INC: $61,000 · AnimalsA TAIL TO TEL…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $90,500 · HealthST JUDE C…THE HOUSE OF HOPE INC: $15,000 · HealthTHE HOUSE…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $10,000 · HealthAMERICAN …ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $7,500 · HealthALZHEIMER…GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $53,500 · Human ServicesPACKER COLLEGIATE INSTITUTE: $49,750 · EducationTHE INNER TRUTH PROJECT INC: $23,000 · Crime & LegalTHE VANDUZER FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$801,500Social Science$290,000Animals$186,250Health$123,000Human Services$53,500Education$49,750Crime & Legal$23,000Philanthropy$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCARING FIELDS FELINES INC: $290,000 over 10y, 7.1% of budgetTHE COUNCIL ON AGING OF MARTIN COUNTY INC: $137,000 over 10y, 0.6% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $90,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFOR OUR FRIENDS INC: $64,250 over 10y, 6.4% of budgetMUTTVILLE: $61,000 over 10y, 0.1% of budgetA TAIL TO TELL INC: $61,000 over 10y, 17% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $53,500 over 10y, 0.0% of budgetPACKER COLLEGIATE INSTITUTE: $49,750 over 10y, 0.0% of budgetMOLLY'S HOUSE INC: $33,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetTHE INNER TRUTH PROJECT INC: $23,000 over 6y, 4.5% of budgetTHE HOUSE OF HOPE INC: $15,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCARING VOICE COALITION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CARING FIELDS FELINES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COUNCIL ON AGING OF MARTIN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds FOR OUR FRIENDS INC ↗
  • Who funds MUTTVILLE ↗
  • Who funds A TAIL TO TELL INC ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds PACKER COLLEGIATE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds MOLLY'S HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE INNER TRUTH PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HOUSE OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE VANDUZER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds CARING VOICE COALITION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation - Martin / St Lucie IncFL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation - Martin / St Lucie Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization D'Agostino Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from D'Agostino Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on D'Agostino’s filings →

    More from the funding graph