Skip to content

· Private foundation

Curtiss & Mary Brennan Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$41k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Science & Tech$141kEducation$54kArts & Culture$19kHealth$17kInternational$5kSocial Science$5kReligion$5kRecreation & Sports$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$587k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MCMASTER UNIVERSITY$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI$5,000
THE CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI$5,000
TULANE UNIVERSITY$5,000
PROVIDENCE COLLEGE$5,000
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY$5,000
THE GS UDH FOUNDATION AT THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY OF DOMINGUEZ HILLS$4,700
BLUE SKYE FOUNDATION$2,000
UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO$1,800
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$1,000
THE HISTORIC SANTA FE FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 86% of grant dollars ($217k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 14% that went abroad ($36k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THINK NEW MEXICO: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
CT
RI
CA
UT
MO
KY
VA
AZ
NM
NC
LA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 14% of all-years giving ($36k)

5 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Canada$11k · 3 grants
France$10k · 2 grants
Peru$5k · 1 grant
United Kingdom$5k · 1 grant
GI$5k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 26% of Curtiss & Mary Brennan Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 17% of the giving stays in NM; by stated purpose, 12%.

Curtiss & Mary Brennan Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 42% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

39%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$96k · 12 repeat orgs$153k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
31

Total granted

$96k
$131k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+69%

Still filing today

67%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationInternationalHealthHuman ServicesAnimalsRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SANTA FE DESERT CHORALE
    6× · 2017–2023 · $12k · revenue +65%
  • TA
    THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +16%
  • BS
    BLUE SKYE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $10k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • TA
    THE AMERICAN ACADEMIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
  • IF
    INSTITUT FRANCOIS D'ETUDES ANDENAS
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • YU
    YALE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
3
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
4
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
5
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
6
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
7
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
8
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
9
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
10
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
11
The New School

The new school's mission is to prepare our students to understand, contribute to, and succeed in a rapidly changing society, and thus make the world a better and more just place. (continued on schedule o)

Education
12
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwestern University; the most unlike its peers is New Mexico Alive. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI: $15,000 · OtherCURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURIUNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI: $15,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MISSOURISANTA FE DESERT CHORALE: $11,500 · OtherSANTA FE DESERT CHORALETHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI: $10,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATITHE FRENCH NATIONAL CENTRE FOR SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH: $9,800 · OtherTHE FRENCH NATIONAL CENTRE FOR SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHTHE AMERICAN ACADEMIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $7,000 · Other+27 more: $115,446 · Other+27 moreTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $10,000 · EducationTHE ADMINISTRATORS O…Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $5,000 · EducationTemple University - …SAINT ANSELM COLLEGE: $5,000 · EducationSAINT ANSELM COLLEGEWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSIT…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $5,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIV…PROVIDENCE COLLEGE: $5,000 · EducationPROVIDENCE COLLEGEThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $4,500 · EducationThe Research Foundat…FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · EducationFLORIDA STATE UNIVER…CENTRE COLLEGE: $2,600 · EducationCENTRE COLLEGEBLUE SKYE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthNEW MEXICO ALIVE: $1,000 · HealthNorthwestern University: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,000 · InternationalPLAN INTERNATIONAL USA INC: $2,000 · InternationalOASIS SANCTUARY FOUNDATION LTD: $2,500 · AnimalsTHINK NEW MEXICO: $1,000 · Human Services
Other$183,746Education$45,100Health$11,000Recreation & Sports$5,000International$5,000Animals$2,500Human Services$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSANTA FE DESERT CHORALE: $11,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE SKYE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 4y, 9.8% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT ANSELM COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $5,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROVIDENCE COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRE COLLEGE: $2,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOASIS SANCTUARY FOUNDATION LTD: $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPLAN INTERNATIONAL USA INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHistoric Santa Fe Foundation Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNEW MEXICO ALIVE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHINK NEW MEXICO: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SANTA FE DESERT CHORALE ↗
  • Who funds THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds BLUE SKYE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education ↗
  • Who funds SAINT ANSELM COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds The Research Foundation for The State University of New York ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRE COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Curtiss & Mary Brennan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Curtiss & Mary Brennan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Curtiss & Mary Brennan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph