Skip to content

· Public charity

Curebound

CUREBOUND's mission is to accelerate cancer research and save lives.

$10M
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5.7M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$24M
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
  • $250k+9 grants · $10M
$337,270
Median grant
2
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA UC SAN DIEGO$5,743,423
SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS$1,529,548
THE SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES$849,414
SCRIPPS RESEARCH$537,267
LA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY$385,027
SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION$337,270
BEKEN BIO INC$250,000
ILLUDENT INC$250,000
RESOLUTE SCIENCE INC$250,000
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA$100,000
RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$6,650
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $100k → 15%SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS: $1.5M → 11%THE SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES: $849k → 11%La Jolla Institute for Immunology: $604k → 11%SCRIPPS RESEARCH: $537k → 11%LA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY: $532k → 11%La Jolla Institute for Immunology: $464k → 11%SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS: $412k → 11%Sanford Burnham Presbys Medical: $400k → 11%Salk Institute for Biological Studies: $386k → 11%LA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY: $385k → 11%Sanford Burnham Presbys Medical Discovery Institute: $360k → 11%Rady's Children Hospital San Diego: $469k → 11%The Salk Institute for Biological Studies: $360k → 11%Rady's Children Hospital San Diego: $441k → 11%Salk Institute for Biological Studies: $229k → 11%Rady's Children Hospital San Diego: $360k → 11%Sanford Burnham Presbys Medical Discovery Institute: $229k → 11%Rady's Childrens Hospital San Diego: $229k → 11%Scripps Research: $225k → 11%Rady's Children Hospital San Diego: $226k → 11%THE SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES: $208k → 11%Rady's Children Hospital San Diego: $226k → 11%SCRIPPS RESEARCH: $189k → 11%RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $21k → 11%Scripps Resarch: $175k → 11%RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $7k → 11%Sanford Burnham Presbys Medical Center: $10k → 11%SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $337k → 11%PALM THERAPEUTICS INC: $250k → 11%RESOLUTE SCIENCE INC: $250k → 11%ILLUDENT INC: $250k → 11%RESOLUTE SCIENCE INC: $250k → 11%THE REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA UC SAN DIEGO: $5.7M → 11%THE REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA UC SAN DIEGO: $4.7M → 11%The Regents of University of California: $3.3M → 11%Moores Cancer Center at UC San Diego: $1.7M → 11%Moores Cancer Center at UC San Diego: $1.6M → 11%UCSD Foundation: $1.3M → 11%Moores Cancer Center at UC San Diego Health: $1.3M → 11%UC San Diego Foundation: $839k → 11%SEREN BIO CORP: $250k → 11%BEKEN BIO INC: $250k → 11%BEKEN BIO INC: $250k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$33M · 10 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
4

Total granted

$33M
$901k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+1%

Still filing today

60%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $687k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    The Salk Institute for Biological Studies
    7× · 2017–2025 · $2.9M · revenue +38%
  • US
    UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $2.2M · revenue +45%
  • RC
    RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL SAN DIEGO
    7× · 2017–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • PT
    PALM THERAPEUTICS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $250k
  • SB
    SEREN BIO CORP
    one grant, 2024 · $250k
  • RC
    Rady's Children Hospital San Diego
    one grant, 2023 · $226k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Institute for Immunology and Immunotherapy

To harness the power of the human immune system and advanced computing technologies to create and translate scientific discoveries into next generation vaccines and therapies for prevention, control and cure of chronic diseases, enabling…

Health
2
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
3
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
4
California Institute for BioMedical Research

Our mission is to build a unique institute that bridges basic research and drug discovery, and that attracts the best and brightest scientists, physicians and students to work together synergistically to find cures for neglected human…

—
5
Charles R Drew University of Medicine and Science

Charles r. drew university of medicine and science is a private non-profit student-centered university that is committed to cultivating diverse health professional leaders who are dedicated to social justice and health equity for…

Education
6
Sanford Consortium for Regenerative Medicine

The sanford consortium is a collaboration among five preeminent life science research institutions formed to enable renowned scientists with expertise in stem cell and regenerative medicine research to collaborate to seek transformative…

Health
7
The Graduate School of the Stowers Institute for Medical Research

The graduate school of the stowers institute for medical research ("gssimr") exempt purpose is to provide graduate education that will prepare scholars for scientific research in the biological sciences.

Education
8
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University

Stanford university is one of a select group of american universities that have achieved eminence in both undergraduate and graduate education and research - cont'd sch o.

Education
9
Doheny Eye Institute

To further the conservation, improvement and restoration of human eyesight" (mrs. doheny - 1947).

—
10
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
11
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
12
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Scripps Research Institute; the most unlike its peers is Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $13,805,459 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIAMoores Cancer Center at UC San Diego: $4,659,773 · OtherMoores Cancer Center at UC San DiegoLA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY: $1,985,719 · OtherLA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY+7 more: $2,075,575 · Other+7 moreSANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE: $3,850,664 · HealthSANFORD BURNHAM PREBY…RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL SAN DIEGO: $1,753,211 · HealthRADY CHILDREN'S HOSPI…SCRIPPS HEALTH: $950,885 · HealthSCRIPPS HEALTH+1 more: $175,000 · HealthThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies: $2,942,844 · Science & TechThe Salk …UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $2,185,730 · EducationSAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION SDSU RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $337,270 · Education
Other$22,526,526Health$6,729,760Science & Tech$2,942,844Education$2,523,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE: $3,850,664 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies: $2,942,844 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $2,185,730 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetLA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY: $1,985,719 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetRADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL SAN DIEGO: $1,753,211 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSCRIPPS HEALTH: $950,885 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION SDSU RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $337,270 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $175,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds The Salk Institute for Biological Studies ↗
  • Who funds UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds SCRIPPS HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION SDSU RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Scripps Research InstituteCA13.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Scripps Research Institute · The San Diego Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Curebound funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Curebound. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Curebound’s filings →

    More from the funding graph