Skip to content

California · Public charity

Curebound

CUREBOUND's mission is to accelerate cancer research and save lives. We raise and invest strategic funding for innovative adult and pediatric cancer research with one vision: cures in our lifetime.

$10M
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
11
Grants FY2025
10
Organizations funded FY2024
40%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$337,270
Largest grant, FY2025
$5,743,423
Organizations funded a year
4 to 10
FY2017 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$12M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 40% of the organizations Curebound funded were first-time grantees, receiving 14% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving11$10M27%
FY202410$7.1M40%
FY20235$4.4M60%
FY20226$3.0M33%
FY20214$1.5M25%
FY20194$3.1M0%
FY20184$2.9M0%
FY20174$2.4Mn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$24M

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Regents of the University of California$13,805,4593n/a
Moores Cancer Center at UC San Diego$4,659,7733n/a
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute$3,850,66481%
The Salk Institute for Biological Studies$2,942,84470%
Uc San Diego Foundation$2,185,73021%
La Jolla Institute for Immunology$1,985,71941%
Rady Children's Hospital San Diego$1,753,21170%
Scripps Health$950,88530%
Beken Bio Inc$500,0002n/a
Resolute Science Inc$500,0002n/a
Show all 17 grantees
All grantees of Curebound by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Regents of the University of California$13,805,4593n/a
Moores Cancer Center at UC San Diego$4,659,7733n/a
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute$3,850,66481%
The Salk Institute for Biological Studies$2,942,84470%
Uc San Diego Foundation$2,185,73021%
La Jolla Institute for Immunology$1,985,71941%
Rady Children's Hospital San Diego$1,753,21170%
Scripps Health$950,88530%
Beken Bio Inc$500,0002n/a
Resolute Science Inc$500,0002n/a
San Diego State University Foundation Sdsu Research Foundation$337,27010%
Palm Therapeutics Inc$250,0001n/a
Illudent Inc$250,0001n/a
Seren Bio Corp$250,0001n/a
Rady's Children Hospital San Diego$225,5751n/a
The Scripps Research Institute$175,00010%
University of Arizona$100,0001n/a

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Curebound supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute: $3,850,664 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies: $2,942,844 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetUc San Diego Foundation: $2,185,730 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetLa Jolla Institute for Immunology: $1,985,719 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetRady Children's Hospital San Diego: $1,753,211 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetScripps Health: $950,885 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSan Diego State University Foundation Sdsu Research Foundation: $337,270 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Scripps Research Institute: $175,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Scripps Research InstituteCA13.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Scripps Research Institute · The San Diego Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Curebound with peer funders

About Curebound

How much does Curebound give?
Curebound reported 11 grants totaling $10,238,599 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 4 and 10 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2024.
What does Curebound fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Health (100%).
Who are Curebound's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Regents of the University of California ($14M), Moores Cancer Center at UC San Diego ($4.7M), Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute ($3.9M).
Does Curebound fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 40% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Curebound?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Scripps Research Institute, The San Diego Foundation, Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc.
Where is Curebound based?
Curebound is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Curebound’s filings →

More from the funding graph