Skip to content

· Private foundation

Culture Need & Heritage Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$20k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$32kYouth Development$32kHousing & Shelter$32kHealth$27kHuman Services$26kEducation$18kCommunity Improvement$17kScience & Tech$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$242k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN$3,163
YOUNG LIFE - SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN$3,000
THE SOUP KITCHEN INC$2,051
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$2,010
COREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION$2,000
EMERGENCY SHELTER SERVICES$2,000
READINESS CENTER INC$1,545
LORY'S PLACE$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,033
HARBOR HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$1,023
WELL OF GRACE MINISTRIES$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WELL OF GRACE MINISTRIES: $1k → 15%MOSAIC CCDA: $5k → 15%READINESS CENTER: $4k → 15%MOSAIC CCDA: $2k → 15%MOSAIC CCDA: $2k → 15%MOSAIC CCDA: $2k → 15%MOSAIC CCDA: $2k → 15%MOSAIC CCDA: $2k → 15%MOSAIC CCDA: $2k → 15%READINESS CENTER INC: $2k → 15%READINESS CENTER: $2k → 15%READINESS CENTER: $1k → 15%READINESS CENTER: $1k → 15%READINESS CENTER: $1k → 15%READINESS CENTER: $1k → 15%READINESS CENTER: $1k → 15%WELL OF GRACE MINISTRIES: $1k → 15%WELL OF GRACE MINISTRIES: $1k → 15%WELL OF GRACE MINISTRIES: $1k → 15%WELL OF GRACE MINISTRIES: $1k → 15%WELL OF GRACE MINISTRIES: $1k → 15%WELL OF GRACE MINISTRIES: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$180k · 18 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against -21% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
17

Total granted

$180k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
-21%

Still filing today

50%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FA
    FEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN
    8× · 2017–2025 · $24k · revenue +38%
  • HA
    Hospice at Home Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $17k · revenue +18%
  • University of Chicago
    3× · 2020–2022 · $15k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • ES
    EMERGENCY SHELTER BERRIEN COUNTRY
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • BH
    BENTON HARBOR HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2024 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Christian Home

The michigan christian home dba beacon hill at eastgate, a not-for-profit corporation, provides housing and health services in a christian environment for older adults, thus enabling them to meet their ongoing physical, social and…

—
2
Harbor Country Chamber of Commerce

To promote business and economic development for eight towns in southwest michigan.

—
3
Berrien Community Foundation Inc

To connect the power of the people who care with causes and organizations that strengthen our communities.

Philanthropy
4
Harbor Beach Community Hospital

To provide community access to quality health care.

Health
5
Habitat for Humanity of Michigan Inc

Our mission is to assist our affiliates to increase capacity to build simple decent homes in partnership with people in need in the State of Michigan.

Housing & Shelter
6
Hospice of Michigan Inc

Hospice of Michigan, Inc. meets our patients and families where they are with urgency, purpose and compassionate accountability surrounding them with decades of dedicated hospice expertise.

Human Services
7
Bellin Memorial Hospital Inc

Bellin health is a community owned not-for-profit organization responsible for improving the health and wellbeing of people living in northeast wisconsin and the upper peninsula of michigan, and all others we serve. we carry out this…

Health
8
Benton Habitat for Humanity

Benton habitat for humanity is a countywide ecumenical ministry that seeks to eliminate substandard housing and to make decent shelter a matter of action and conscience by having people from all income levels work together.

—
9
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
10
Barry County United Way

None

Philanthropy
11
Hancock County Habitat for Humanity

Partnering with economically disadvantaged individuals and families. Hancock County Habitat For Humanity seeks to eliminate poverty housing and to make decent, affordable shelter a matter of conscience and action.

—
12
Harbor Hospice Foundation

Harbor hospice foundation's purpose is to support activities of its nonprofit affiliated corporation, hospice of muskegon county, inc., also known as harbor hospice. in so doing, it shall provide relief of the poor, the distressed and the…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice at Home Inc; the most unlike its peers is Well of Grace Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN: $24,393 · OtherFEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGANYOUNGLIFE OF SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN: $18,575 · OtherYOUNGLIFE OF SOUTHWEST MICHIGANThe Soup Kitchen Inc: $12,615 · OtherThe Soup Kitchen IncLORYS PLACE: $9,000 · OtherLORYS PLACELAKELAND HEALTH FOUNDATION: $8,536 · OtherLAKELAND HEALTH FOUNDATIONEMERGENCY SHELTER: $8,000 · OtherEMERGENCY SHELTERHarbor Habitat for Humanity Inc: $7,113 · OtherHarbor Habitat for Humanity IncEMERGENCY SHELTER BERRIEN COUNTRY: $4,500 · Other+20 more: $38,881 · Other+20 moreMOSAIC CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION INC: $16,755 · Human ServicesMOSAIC CHRISTIAN C…READINESS CENTER INC: $11,725 · Human ServicesREADINESS CENTER I…Well of Grace Ministries Inc: $7,060 · Human ServicesWell of Grace Mini…University of Chicago: $15,000 · EducationUniversit…BENTON HARBOR PROMISE FOUNDATION: $2,500 · EducationBENTON HA…Hospice at Home Inc: $16,500 · Health+1 more: $500 · HealthBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN: $10,083 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE: $6,105 · Youth DevelopmentEMERGENCY SHELTER SERVICES INC: $2,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$131,613Human Services$35,540Education$17,500Health$17,000Youth Development$16,188Housing & Shelter$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN: $24,393 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMOSAIC CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION INC: $16,755 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetHospice at Home Inc: $16,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Soup Kitchen Inc: $12,615 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetREADINESS CENTER INC: $11,725 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN: $10,083 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHarbor Habitat for Humanity Inc: $7,113 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetWell of Grace Ministries Inc: $7,060 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $6,105 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBENTON HARBOR PROMISE FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetBERRIEN COUNTY CANCER SERVICES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds MOSAIC CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Hospice at Home Inc ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds The Soup Kitchen Inc ↗
  • Who funds READINESS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds Harbor Habitat for Humanity Inc ↗
  • Who funds Well of Grace Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds BENTON HARBOR PROMISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EMERGENCY SHELTER SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds BERRIEN COUNTY CANCER SERVICES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Berrien Community Foundation IncMI24× affinity9 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Berrien Community Foundation Inc · Whirlpool Foundation · Fettig Family Foundation · United Way of Southwest Michigan · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Culture Need & Heritage Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Culture Need & Heritage Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Culture Need & Heritage’s filings →

    More from the funding graph