· Private foundation
CSP Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Various 501c3 organizations | $125,080 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +58% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.
60 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 59 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- CYCHASDEI YISROEL INC5× · 2017–2022 · $75k · revenue +112%
- MCMISASKIM CORP6× · 2017–2022 · $8k · revenue +34%
- IFINSTITUTE FOR DAYANIM5× · 2017–2022 · $6k · revenue +115%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $14k
- MHMA'AYNEI HAYESHUA TRUSTone grant, 2018 · $6k · revenue -88%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $6k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide medical support to families in need
Provides finacial assistance to needy individuals and to religious, charitable organizations
Congregation beth-el sephardic center of jamaica estates is a religious institution
To assist the sick and elderly by providing financial support for medical expenses, hot meals for the invalid home-bound, patient advocacy and support, new mother convalescence, patient family support, overnight accomodations for visiting…
To provide financial support to the yeshiva knesseth yisroel institution, its rabbis, and students, and lend support to other religious institutions in israel and around the world, with the goal of furthering jewish values among the jewish…
Maintain communal and charitable affairs in accordance with the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith
To provide financial and other assistance to needy persons and families in Israel
To facilitate traditional religious burial for those of the orthodox jewish faith in accordance with the ancient jewish custom of being buried on israeli soil by arranging for the resale of burial plots in israeli cemeteries and providing…
Tzidkas Binyamin is organized for charitable, religious and educational purposes, to assist Jewish orthodox institutions and needy individuals in need of financial aid.
To provide support to jewish religious education in israel and around the world, and provide financial assistance to and on behalf of yeshivah beth israel tifereth menachem.
Provide financial assistance to needy individuals, and to religious, educational, and charitable organizations in us and abroad.
How this is measured
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 108 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Allen I Gross Charitable Foundation · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · Md Friedman Family Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The Nathan and Marilyn Silberman Fdn · The Basch Family Foundation · The Jmg Foundation · The Reich Family Charitable Trust · Yisroel Aryeh and Leib Foundation · Bcg Charitable Foundation · The J W Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization CSP Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from CSP Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on CSP’s filings →