· Private foundation
Csp Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k40 grants · $180k
- $10k–50k25 grants · $300k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| APPRENTICE LEARNING | $50,000 |
| MOUNT GRACE LAND CONSERVATION TRUST | $35,000 |
| NEW WORLD FOUNDATION CLIMATE | $15,000 |
| NEW WORLD FOUNDATION ECLIPSE FUND | $15,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD AMERICA | $15,000 |
| GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK | $15,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS | $12,000 |
| ACLU FOUNDATION | $12,000 |
| BOSTON HEALTH CARE HOMELESS | $11,000 |
| SOUTHERN CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS | $10,000 |
| NATIONAL WOMEN'S HEALTH | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS | $10,000 |
| REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL | $10,000 |
| CARROLL CENTER FOR BLIND | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $285k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against -93% for the ones you funded once.
87 repeat relationships — 61 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ALAPPRENTICE LEARNING INC9× · 2017–2025 · $550k · revenue +277%
- MGMOUNT GRACE LAND CONSERVATION TRUST9× · 2017–2025 · $290k · revenue +52%
- GBGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC9× · 2017–2025 · $126k · revenue +89%
Funded once
- ECEARTH CITIZENS ORGANIZATIONone grant, 2017 · $2.0M · revenue -93% · 65% of their budget
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $10k
- WOWHITE OAKS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHone grant, 2021 · $8k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…
Ceres is a nonprofit advocacy organization working to accelerate the transition to a cleaner, more just, and resilient world. through education and research, we make the business case for action on the most pressing sustainability…
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
Improving the transparency and scientific integrity of climate solutions through open data and tools.
To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.
Environment next supports individuals, nonprofits and businesses around the world on solutions to complex climate issues. we provide leadership, outreach and communication support, grants, and investments to empower leaders and their ideas…
To develop and promote a carbon dividends framework - based on carbon fees whose revenues are rebated to citizens through dividends - as the most cost-effective, equitable, and politically viable climate solution.
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
World coffee research unites the global coffee industry to drive science-based agricultural solutions to urgently secure a diverse and sustainable supply of quality coffee today and for generations to come. our mission is to grow, protect,…
Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grassroots International Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wgbh Educational Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
67 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 67 of the 97 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EARTH CITIZENS ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds APPRENTICE LEARNING INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNT GRACE LAND CONSERVATION TRUST ↗
- Who funds BROOKLINE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE NEW WORLD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds AUDUBON SOCIETY OF WESTERN PA ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Oil Change International Inc ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S LUNCH PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds PRIMARY SOURCE INC ↗
- Who funds The Food Project Inc ↗
- Who funds Southern Center for Human Rights ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ROSIE'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds PINE STREET INN INC ↗
- Who funds The Farm School Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PREPARATORY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds CASA MYRNA VAZQUEZ INC ↗
- Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds Earthworks ↗
- Who funds FOOD & WATER WATCH ↗
- Who funds MADRE INC ↗
- Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
- Who funds UNITED WE DREAM NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S REFUGEE COMMISSION INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · The Hamilton Company Charitable Foundation · Tides Foundation · Common Counsel Foundation · The Fish Family Foundation · Ploughshares Foundation · The Cabot Family Charitable Trust · Adelard & Valeda Roy Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Fidelity Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Csp Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Health Care for All Inc — 29% of income from government
- Primary Source Inc — 23% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- Community Servings Inc — 12% of income from government
- The Farm School Inc — 12% of income from government
- Pine Street Inn Inc — 11% of income from government
- Women's Lunch Place Inc — 8% of income from government
- Casa Myrna Vazquez Inc — 5% of income from government
- 826 Boston Inc — 3% of income from government
- The Trustees of Reservations — 2% of income from government
- Speak for the Trees Inc — 2% of income from government
- Brookline Arts Center — 2% of income from government
- Wgbh Educational Foundation — 1% of income from government
- Rosie's Place Inc — 0% of income from government
- Oxfam-America Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.