Skip to content
Crozier Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Crozier Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$22k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$51kPhilanthropy$33kHealth$24kArts & Culture$11kFood & Nutrition$10kAnimals$7kCivil Rights$4kInternational$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$665k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Dallas Foundation$6,000
The Bennett Project$3,865
Pooch Savers Rescue$3,000
Crossroads Community Services$3,000
The Westwood School$2,500
Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas$2,500
Drake University$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%American National Red Cross: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$95k · 11 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
8

Total granted

$95k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+38%

Still filing today

64%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationArts & CultureFood & NutritionHuman ServicesPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $15k · revenue +4%
  • DRAKE UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $11k · revenue +15%
  • CC
    CROSSROADS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $10k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • TE
    Texas Equal Access Fund
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
  • HI
    Hope International
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • OF
    ORLANDO FAMILY STAGE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +17%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Health System of Texas

With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…

Health
2
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
3
Children's Cancer Fund of Dallas inc

Children's cancer fund champions kids in their fight against cancer through strategic investments in research and care in north texas.

Health
4
Texas Trees Foundation

The mission of texas trees foundation is to improve the health of cities and people through the transformative power of trees.

—
5
Texas Children's Hospital

Texas children's hospital, headquartered in houston, texas, is a not-for-profit organization whose mission is to create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and…

Health
6
Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council

The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.

—
7
Wi Cook Foundation Inc

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
8
Communities Foundation of Texas Inc

The foundation is committed to serving charitable needs both domestically and abroad through charitable grants and services at the discretion of the board of trustees.

Philanthropy
9
Children's Cancer Research Fund

Children's cancer research fund fuels transformational research to bring better treatments and cures to children with cancer.

Philanthropy
10
Methodist Hospitals of Dallas

The primary mission or purpose of methodist health system is to serve people in defined service areas by meeting their health needs effectively and in a manner that reflects a "commitment to the christian concepts of life and learning" as…

Health
11
Dallas Tourism Public Improvement District Corporation

The dallas tourism public improvement district ("dtpid") is a public improvement district dedicated to improving convention and group hotel bookings and hotel room night consumption in the city of dallas, texas.

Community Improvement
12
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Dallas Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Bennett Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
13/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Shelton School Landmark Foundation: $15,000 · OtherShelton School Landmark FoundationJune Shelton School: $10,000 · OtherJune Shelton SchoolPOOCH SAVERS RESCUE: $7,008 · OtherPOOCH SAVERS RESCUEThe University of Texas at Austin UT College of Pharmacy: $5,000 · OtherThe University of Texas at Austin …Texas Equal Access Fund: $4,000 · OtherTexas Equal Access FundHope International: $2,127 · Other+1 more: $1,000 · OtherTHE DALLAS FOUNDATION: $33,000 · PhilanthropyTHE DALLAS FOUNDATIONTHE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL: $1,800 · PhilanthropyPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC: $14,640 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD…BENNETT PROJECT: $3,865 · HealthBENNETT PROJECTCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $3,410 · HealthCHILDREN'S MEDICAL…American Heart Association Inc: $1,300 · HealthAmerican Heart Ass…DRAKE UNIVERSITY: $11,000 · EducationDRAKE UNIVERSITYTHE WESTWOOD SCHOOL CORP: $6,613 · EducationTHE WESTWOOD SCH…HIGHLAND PARK ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $3,500 · EducationHIGHLAND PARK IS…NORTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC: $9,000 · Arts & CultureORLANDO FAMILY STAGE INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureCROSSROADS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $9,500 · Food & NutritionAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,300 · Human ServicesTROOPS FIRST FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $1,000 · Public Benefit
Other$44,135Philanthropy$34,800Health$23,215Education$21,113Arts & Culture$11,000Food & Nutrition$9,500Human Services$1,300Public Benefit$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE DALLAS FOUNDATION: $33,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC: $14,640 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDRAKE UNIVERSITY: $11,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSROADS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $9,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC: $9,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WESTWOOD SCHOOL CORP: $6,613 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBENNETT PROJECT: $3,865 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetHIGHLAND PARK ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $3,410 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetORLANDO FAMILY STAGE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWIPE OUT KIDS' CANCER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundatio…Texas Instruments Fou…National Philanthropi…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX14.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Crozier Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Crozier Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Crozier Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home