Skip to content

· Private foundation

Crowther Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$17k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$35kHealth$19kHuman Services$15kCrime & Legal$13kHousing & Shelter$13kInternational$5kCommunity Improvement$5kAnimals$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$300
Median grant
10
States reached
$414k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIVING HOPE EDUCATIONAL ENTERPRISES$6,000
CHILDRENS JUSTICE CENTER$2,000
PARKINSONS FOUNDATION$1,000
FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER$1,000
THE CHRISTMAS BOX INTERNATIONAL$1,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES$1,000
ANGEL FLIGHT WEST$500
CANYON CREEK WOMENS CRISIS CENTER$500
PRIMARY CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$500
DAYS FOR GIRLS$500
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITA$500
THE SMILE TRAIN$318
IRON COUNTY CARE AND SHARE$300
Individual grant recipient$300
ROCKY MOUNTAIN ELK FOUNDATION$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 41% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%THE ROAD HOME: $5k → 8%THE ROAD HOME: $4k → 8%THE ROAD HOME: $800 → 8%CANYON CREEK WOMENS CRISIS CENTER: $500 → 13%CANYON CREEK WOMENS CRISIS CENTER: $2k → 13%CANYON CREEK WOMENS CRISIS CENTER: $1k → 13%CANYON CREEK WOMENS CRISIS CENTER: $500 → 13%CANYON CREEK WOMENS CRISIS CENTER: $500 → 13%CANYON CREEK WOMENS CRISIS CENTER: $500 → 13%CANYON CREEK WOMENS CRISIS CENTER: $500 → 13%CANYON CREEK WOMENS CRISIS CENTER: $500 → 13%CANYON CREEK WOMENS CRISIS CENTER: $500 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
IL
NY
OR
NJ
CA
UT
KS
TN
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$146k · 30 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +121% since the first grant, against +49% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
10

Total granted

$146k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+121%
+49%

Still filing today

33%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalEducationHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    THE ROAD HOME
    3× · 2017–2019 · $9k · revenue +121%
  • CC
    CANYON CREEK WOMENS CRISIS CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $6k · revenue +163%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $5k · revenue +125%

Funded once

  • HT
    HEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +52%
  • CC
    CEDAR CITY FIREMANS ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
2
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
3
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
4
Globus Relief

The mission of globus relief is to improve the delivery of healthcare worldwide by gathering, processing and distributing surplus medical and health supplies to charities at home and abroad.

International
5
Childfund International Usa

Childfund's mission is to help deprived, excluded and vulnerable children have the capacity to become young adults, parents and leaders who bring lasting and positive change to their communities, and to promote societies whose individuals…

International
6
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
7
Children's Heartlink

We save children's lives by transforming pediatric heart care in underserved parts of the world.

—
8
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
9
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
10
Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc

For over 20 years, chai's mission has been to save lives and improve health outcomes in low-and middle-income countries around the world. we do this by enabling the government and private sector to strengthen and sustain quality health…

International
11
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
12
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wikimedia Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Days for Girls International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $31,861 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLIVING HOPE EDUCATIONAL ENTERPRISES: $28,000 · OtherLIVING HOPE EDUCATIONAL ENTERPRISESCHILDRENS JUSTICE CENTER: $13,000 · OtherCHILDRENS JUSTICE CENTERPRIMARY CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $6,900 · OtherPRIMARY CHILDRENS HOSPITALFAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $4,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $4,550 · Other+28 more: $22,368 · Other+28 moreTHE ROAD HOME: $8,800 · Human ServicesTHE ROAD HO…CANYON CREEK WOMENS CRISIS CENTER: $6,000 · Human ServicesCANYON CREE…+1 more: $400 · Human ServicesST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,900 · HealthST JUDE CH…Ronald McDonald House Global: $4,600 · HealthRonald McD…ANGEL FLIGHT WEST INC: $3,500 · HealthANGEL FLIG…PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · HealthPARKINSON'…Days For Girls International: $2,500 · InternationalHEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,000 · InternationalCACHE COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC: $200 · InternationalTHE CHRISTMAS BOX INTERNATIONAL: $4,500 · Community ImprovementIRON COUNTY CARE AND SHARE: $3,852 · Housing & ShelterINTERNATIONAL LANGUAGE PROGRAMS INC: $250 · EducationWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $50 · Education
Other$111,429Human Services$15,200Health$14,000International$4,700Community Improvement$4,500Housing & Shelter$3,852Education$300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ROAD HOME: $8,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCANYON CREEK WOMENS CRISIS CENTER: $6,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,900 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetRonald McDonald House Global: $4,600 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHRISTMAS BOX INTERNATIONAL: $4,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetIRON COUNTY CARE AND SHARE: $3,852 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetANGEL FLIGHT WEST INC: $3,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $2,718 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDays For Girls International: $2,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCharity Navigator: $400 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL LANGUAGE PROGRAMS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCACHE COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE ROAD HOME ↗
  • Who funds CANYON CREEK WOMENS CRISIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Global ↗
  • Who funds THE CHRISTMAS BOX INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds IRON COUNTY CARE AND SHARE ↗
  • Who funds ANGEL FLIGHT WEST INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds Days For Girls International ↗
  • Who funds HEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Charity Navigator ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL LANGUAGE PROGRAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds CACHE EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sorenson Legacy FoundationUT13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sorenson Legacy Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Crowther Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Crowther Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Crowther Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Crowther Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Crowther’s filings →

    More from the funding graph