Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Crown Family Foundation

To support and carry out the exempt purposes of the jewish federation of metropolitan chicago and the jewish united fund of metropolitan chicago by such means as the board of directors of the organizations may determine.

$30M
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$15M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Education$112MPhilanthropy$76MInternational$28MArts & Culture$12MHuman Services$10MReligion$9.3MHealth$9.0MFood & Nutrition$2.7MOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $1.3M
  • $250k+11 grants · $28M
$237,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$531M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago$15,098,500
Covenant Foundation$6,395,000
Jewish Federations of North America$1,450,000
Hillel Torah North Suburban Day School$952,514
Solomon Schechter Day School of Metropolitan Chicago$908,336
Chicago Jewish Day School$867,315
The ARK$825,000
Bernard Zell Anshe Emet Day School$636,063
Beit Tshuvah$375,000
Akiba Schechter - Jewish Day School$366,137
Maot Chitim$300,000
Friends of ELNET$237,500
Rochelle Zell Jewish High School$196,875
Ida Crown Jewish Academy$131,250
Arie Crown Hebrew Day School$131,250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $11.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Jewish Child and Family Services: $1.5M → 11%Network of Jewish Human Service Agencies: $1.0M → 7%Matan: $180k → 17%Matan Inc: $120k → 17%Jewish Child & Family Services: $1.4M → 14%Jewish Child & Family Services: $350k → 14%Jewish Child & Family Services: $300k → 14%Jewish Child & Family Services: $300k → 14%Jewish Community Centers - EZRA Multi-Service Center: $200k → 14%Jewish Child & Family Services: $200k → 14%Jewish Community Centers: $15k → 14%Council for Jewish Elderly Senior Life: $1.2M → 14%The ARK: $825k → 14%CJE SeniorLife: $680k → 14%CJE SeniorLife: $680k → 14%The ARK: $400k → 14%The ARK: $350k → 14%The ARK: $300k → 14%CJE SeniorLife: $180k → 14%SHALVA: $455k → 14%The ARK: $135k → 14%Shalva: $300k → 14%CJE SeniorLife: $55k → 14%Shalva Inc: $250k → 14%CJE SeniorLife: $50k → 14%Shalva Inc: $100k → 14%THE ARK: $25k → 14%Jewish Community Centers - EZRA Multi-Service Center: $200k → 14%Jewish Community Centers - EZRA Multi-Service Center: $200k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
AZ
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 29% of Crown Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 61% of the giving stays in IL; read by stated purpose it is 20% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Crown Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 31% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$206M · 45 repeat orgs$16M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.

45 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
21

Total granted

$206M
$16M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+28%

Still filing today

82%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $225k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyReligionArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    9× · 2017–2025 · $89M · revenue +13%
  • CF
    Covenant Foundation
    9× · 2017–2025 · $49M · revenue +51% · 100% of their budget
  • JF
    JERUSALEM FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2019–2023 · $12M · revenue +69% · 58% of their budget

Funded once

  • TU
    The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
    one grant, 2018 · $5.0M · revenue +16%
  • SH
    SINAI HEALTH SYSTEMgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2.0M · revenue +37%
  • JT
    JEWISH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2019 · $2.0M

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Judaism Foundation
—
2
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
3
Sherit Isroel
—
4
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
5
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
6
Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education
7
The Jerusalem Connection
—
8
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
9
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
11
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
12
Hebrew University of Jerusalem

To promote, encourage, aid and advance higher and secondary education, research and training in all branches of knowledge. as the standard bearer of excellence, the university strives to ensure and foster outstanding achievements in all…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Hebrew University Inc and the most unlike its peers is Firehouse Community Arts Center of Chicago. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 53 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr13%1%5–10yr18%15%10–20yr15%24%20–35yr14%17%35–55yr22%43%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr18%2%10–20yr15%5%20–35yr14%27%35–55yr22%66%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/74
the rest of the field
12%
8,890/72,285

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

63 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 63 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
62/63
Grantees still filing
47/63
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $88,950,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGOJEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $29,960,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGOTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC — $5,950,000 · Philanthropy+4 more — $2,907,500 · PhilanthropyCovenant Foundation — $48,892,000 · EducationCovenant FoundationBERNARD ZELL ANSHE EMET DAY SCHOOL — $2,330,063 · EducationCHICAGO JEWISH DAY SCHOOL — $2,229,815 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY — $2,100,000 · Education+7 more — $6,429,375 · Education+7 moreJERUSALEM FOUNDATION INC — $11,500,000 · InternationalJERUSALEM FOU…American Friends of Tel Aviv Univ — $4,000,000 · InternationalAmerican Frie…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $3,250,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIE…AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC — $2,500,000 · InternationalAMERICAN SOCI…FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $2,159,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF TH…ECOPEACE MIDDLE EAST ENVIRONMENTAL NGO FORUM — $1,802,500 · InternationalECOPEACE MIDD…BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $1,550,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC — $1,500,000 · InternationalAMERICAN SOCIETY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA — $1,500,000 · International+8 more — $2,510,000 · International+8 moreHILLEL TORAH NORTH SUBURBAN DAY SCHOOL — $3,652,514 · OtherSOLOMON SCHECHTER DAY SCHOOL OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $3,383,336 · OtherJEWISH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF AMERICA — $2,000,000 · OtherKESHET — $1,600,000 · OtherAKIBA-SCHECHTER JEWISH DAY SCHOOL — $1,266,137 · OtherHEBREW UNION COLLEGE-JEWISH INSTITUTE OF RELIGION — $1,250,000 · OtherASSOCIATED TALMUD TORAHS OF CHICAGO — $1,125,000 · OtherARIE CROWN HEBREW DAY SCHOOL — $1,031,250 · OtherIDA CROWN JEWISH ACADEMY INC — $1,031,250 · OtherBeit T'Shuvah — $950,000 · OtherMAOT CHITIM OF GREATER CHICAGO INC — $800,000 · Other+14 more — $2,590,200 · OtherCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY — $2,845,000 · Human ServicesJewish Child and Family Services — $2,520,000 · Human ServicesTHE ARK — $2,035,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC — $1,500,000 · Human ServicesSHALVA INC — $1,105,000 · Human ServicesNETWORK OF JEWISH HUMAN SERVICE AGENCIES INC — $1,000,000 · Human ServicesJewish Community Centers of Chicago — $615,000 · Human Services+1 more — $300,000 · Human ServicesThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $5,000,000 · Arts & CultureFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC — $500,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $190,000 · Arts & CultureSINAI HEALTH SYSTEM — $2,000,000 · HealthAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HERZOG HOSPITAL INC — $1,000,000 · Health
Philanthropy$127,767,500Education$61,981,253International$32,271,500Other$20,679,687Human Services$11,920,000Arts & Culture$5,690,000Health$3,000,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $88,950,000 over 9y, 14% of budgetCovenant Foundation — $48,892,000 over 9y, 100% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $29,960,000 over 9y, 6.1% of budgetJERUSALEM FOUNDATION INC — $11,500,000 over 3y, 58% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC — $5,950,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $5,000,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetAmerican Friends of Tel Aviv Univ — $4,000,000 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $3,250,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY — $2,845,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetJewish Child and Family Services — $2,520,000 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC — $2,500,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetBERNARD ZELL ANSHE EMET DAY SCHOOL — $2,330,063 over 9y, 3.9% of budgetCHICAGO JEWISH DAY SCHOOL — $2,229,815 over 9y, 5.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $2,159,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY — $2,100,000 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetTHE ARK — $2,035,000 over 6y, 5.8% of budgetSINAI HEALTH SYSTEM — $2,000,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $2,000,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC — $2,000,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetECOPEACE MIDDLE EAST ENVIRONMENTAL NGO FORUM — $1,802,500 over 5y, 12% of budgetKESHET — $1,600,000 over 5y, 5.3% of budgetROCHELLE ZELL JEWISH HIGH SCHOOL — $1,554,375 over 9y, 2.9% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $1,550,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC — $1,500,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA — $1,500,000 over 2y, 64% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC — $1,500,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetSHALVA INC — $1,105,000 over 4y, 31% of budgetNETWORK OF JEWISH HUMAN SERVICE AGENCIES INC — $1,000,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HERZOG HOSPITAL INC — $1,000,000 over 1y, 82% of budgetBeit T'Shuvah — $950,000 over 6y, 3.6% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $860,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMAOT CHITIM OF GREATER CHICAGO INC — $800,000 over 5y, 19% of budgetYESHIVAT MAHARAT INC — $740,000 over 6y, 9.7% of budgetJewish Community Centers of Chicago — $615,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $600,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $600,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK — $595,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF ELNET — $545,000 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC — $500,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $500,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetThe Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation) — $330,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetMATAN INC — $300,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetAFSNC INC — $225,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetCLAL-THE NATIONAL JEWISH CENTER FOR LEARNING AND LEADERSHIP INC — $215,200 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MATAN INC — $212,500 over 2y, 12% of budgetWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC — $175,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetB'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION — $137,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetAspen Jewish Center — $100,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds Covenant Foundation ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds JERUSALEM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Tel Aviv Univ ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Child and Family Services ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC ↗
  • Who funds BERNARD ZELL ANSHE EMET DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO JEWISH DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE ARK ↗
  • Who funds SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds The Jerusalem Foundation ↗
  • Who funds AMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds ECOPEACE MIDDLE EAST ENVIRONMENTAL NGO FORUM ↗
  • Who funds KESHET ↗
  • Who funds ROCHELLE ZELL JEWISH HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds SHALVA INC ↗
  • Who funds NETWORK OF JEWISH HUMAN SERVICE AGENCIES INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HERZOG HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Beit T'Shuvah ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of …Arie and Ida Crown Me…Jewish United Fund of…Jewish Communal FundCircle of Service Fou…Jewish Community Fede…Bellows Family Founda…Hochberg Family Found…Walder FoundationThe Chicago Community…Combined Jewish Phila…Bernard Heerey Family…
Jewish Federation of Metropolitan ChicagoIL55.7× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago · Jewish Communal Fund · Circle of Service Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Bellows Family Foundation · Hochberg Family Foundation · Walder Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Bernard Heerey Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Crown Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 74 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines