Skip to content

· Private foundation

Crow Farm Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$90k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$512kArts & Culture$245kEnvironment$138kInternational$50kFood & Nutrition$38kHuman Services$21kHealth$20kSocial Science$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LANE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$30,000
KLCC - NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO$10,000
FOOD FOR LANE COUNTY$10,000
MERCY CORPS$5,000
U OF O BACH FESTIVAL$5,000
U OF O CHAMBER MUSIC$5,000
EUGENE EDUCATION FUND$5,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL$4,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
THE JOHN G SHEDD INSTITUTE$3,000
MCKENZIE RIVER TRUST$2,000
MAUDE KERNS ART CENTER$2,000
KIDS FIRST$1,000
SHELTERCARE$1,000
CASA OF LANE COUNTY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOPE & SAFETY ALLIANCE: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

OR
IA
CA
CO
KY
VA
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$965k · 18 repeat orgs$84k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against -28% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
7

Total granted

$965k
$53k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
-28%

Still filing today

44%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHousing & ShelterEnvironmentArts & CultureCrime & LegalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LANE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $265k · revenue +108%
  • UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $78k · revenue +99%
  • AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND
    8× · 2017–2024 · $78k · revenue +198%

Funded once

  • FE
    FINAL EXIT NETWORK INC
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -28%
  • SI
    SPONSORS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -65%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lane Community College Education Association

Lane Community College Education Association is the union that represents 200 full-time and 375 part-time faculty members at Lane Community College in Eugene, Oregon. LCCEA is an affiliated unit of the Oregon Education Association (OEA)…

—
2
Advocates of Lake County Inc

Organization's mission or most significant activities the advocates of lake county will assist any victim of crime, violence, or other traumatic event, primarily victims of domestic violence and sexual assault. the advocates work for…

Human Services
3
Catholic Community Services of Lane County Inc

Responding to christ's message to love our neighbors as ourselves, catholic community services offers immediate help by providing food and other assistance to anyone in need and seeks to instill hope by helping lane county individuals and…

Human Services
4
Oregon Law Center

To achieve justice for the low income communities of oregon by providing a full range of the highest quality civil legal services.

Crime & Legal
5
Lake County Crisis Center

A safe place is the leading advocate for eliminating domestic violence & human trafficking in northern illinois.

—
6
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
7
Our Children Oregon

Our children oregon's mission is to be a voice and force for the common good for all oregon children, ensuring all children have the resources and opportunities they need to reach their full potential. we elevate data and the voices of…

Philanthropy
8
Lane Workforce Partnership

To meet the workforce needs of employers and individuals through partnerships and innovations in lane county, oregon.

—
9
Family Crisis Centers Inc

Walk with people facing violence, offering safety, support, and hope as they heal and rebuild. with every step forward, we build stronger, more resilient communities.

Human Services
10
Urban League of Portland Inc

To help empower african americans and others achieve equality in education, employment, and economic security.

Human Services
11
Community Supported Shelters

Community supporter shelters offers transitional shelter, personal development, and skill building to unhoused individuals living in safe spot communities (also known as the city of eugenes rest stop program). these communities are a model…

Housing & Shelter
12
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Eugene Mission Inc; the most unlike its peers is Final Exit Network Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BLACKACRE FOUNDATION: $200,000 · OtherBLACKACRE FOUNDATIONKLCC - NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO: $80,000 · OtherKLCC - NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIOUNIVERSITY OF OR FOUNDATION: $45,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF OR FOUNDATIONPLOUGHSHARES FOUNDATION: $45,000 · OtherPLOUGHSHARES FOUNDATIONFOOD FOR LANE COUNTY: $38,000 · OtherFOOD FOR LANE COUNTYTHE SHEDD INSTITUTE: $24,000 · OtherEUGENE EDUCATION FUND: $21,000 · OtherSPONSORS INC: $20,000 · Other+20 more: $78,350 · Other+20 moreLANE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $265,300 · EducationLANE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATIONUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $78,000 · EducationUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INCAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $78,000 · EducationAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND+1 more: $12,000 · EducationFINAL EXIT NETWORK INC: $20,000 · HealthMcKenzie River Trust: $18,000 · EnvironmentMAUDE KERNS ART CENTER: $17,000 · Arts & CultureMercy Corps: $5,000 · InternationalSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $4,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$551,350Education$433,300Health$20,000Environment$18,000Arts & Culture$17,000International$5,000Crime & Legal$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLANE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $265,300 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $78,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $78,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR LANE COUNTY: $38,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFINAL EXIT NETWORK INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSPONSORS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMcKenzie River Trust: $18,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMAUDE KERNS ART CENTER: $17,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetOCCIDENTAL COLLEGE: $12,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Corps: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOMENSPACE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTERCARE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASA OF LANE COUNTY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LANE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR LANE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds FINAL EXIT NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds SPONSORS INC ↗
  • Who funds McKenzie River Trust ↗
  • Who funds MAUDE KERNS ART CENTER ↗
  • Who funds OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Corps ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMENSPACE ↗
  • Who funds EUGENE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds SHELTERCARE ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF LANE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds SQUAREONE VILLAGES ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR30.7× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · Chambers Family Foundation · First Fruits Foundation · McKay Family Foundation · United Way of Lane County · The Woodard Family Foundation · Larson Family Foundation · R & M Clark Family Foundation · Lane Community Health Council · Meyer Memorial Trust · Alton F Baker Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Crow Farm Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Crow Farm Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 18%
  • Womenspace: 62% of income from government
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Friends of the Child Advocacy Center Inc: 33% of income from government
  • Sheltercare: 18% of income from government
  • Sponsors Inc: 8% of income from government
  • McKenzie River Trust: 8% of income from government
  • Food for Lane County: 5% of income from government
  • Squareone Villages: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Crow Farm’s filings →

More from the funding graph