· Private foundation
Crow Farm Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k15 grants · $40k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LANE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| KLCC - NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO | $10,000 |
| FOOD FOR LANE COUNTY | $10,000 |
| MERCY CORPS | $5,000 |
| U OF O BACH FESTIVAL | $5,000 |
| U OF O CHAMBER MUSIC | $5,000 |
| EUGENE EDUCATION FUND | $5,000 |
| ST VINCENT DE PAUL | $4,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
| THE JOHN G SHEDD INSTITUTE | $3,000 |
| MCKENZIE RIVER TRUST | $2,000 |
| MAUDE KERNS ART CENTER | $2,000 |
| KIDS FIRST | $1,000 |
| SHELTERCARE | $1,000 |
| CASA OF LANE COUNTY | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against -28% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LCLANE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION9× · 2017–2025 · $265k · revenue +108%
AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND8× · 2017–2024 · $78k · revenue +198%
UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC8× · 2017–2024 · $78k · revenue +99%
Funded once
- FEFINAL EXIT NETWORK INCone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -28%
- SISPONSORS INCone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -65%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2018 · $6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Lane Community College Education Association is the union that represents 200 full-time and 375 part-time faculty members at Lane Community College in Eugene, Oregon. LCCEA is an affiliated unit of the Oregon Education Association (OEA)…
Organization's mission or most significant activities the advocates of lake county will assist any victim of crime, violence, or other traumatic event, primarily victims of domestic violence and sexual assault. the advocates work for…
Responding to christ's message to love our neighbors as ourselves, catholic community services offers immediate help by providing food and other assistance to anyone in need and seeks to instill hope by helping lane county individuals and…
To achieve justice for the low income communities of oregon by providing a full range of the highest quality civil legal services.
A safe place is the leading advocate for eliminating domestic violence & human trafficking in northern illinois.
Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…
Our children oregon's mission is to be a voice and force for the common good for all oregon children, ensuring all children have the resources and opportunities they need to reach their full potential. we elevate data and the voices of…
To meet the workforce needs of employers and individuals through partnerships and innovations in lane county, oregon.
Walk with people facing violence, offering safety, support, and hope as they heal and rebuild. with every step forward, we build stronger, more resilient communities.
To help empower african americans and others achieve equality in education, employment, and economic security.
Community supporter shelters offers transitional shelter, personal development, and skill building to unhoused individuals living in safe spot communities (also known as the city of eugenes rest stop program). these communities are a model…
The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Eugene Mission Inc and the most unlike its peers is Final Exit Network Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LANE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND ↗
- Who funds UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD FOR LANE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds FINAL EXIT NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds SPONSORS INC ↗
- Who funds McKenzie River Trust ↗
- Who funds MAUDE KERNS ART CENTER ↗
- Who funds OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Mercy Corps ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WOMENSPACE ↗
- Who funds EUGENE MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds SHELTERCARE ↗
- Who funds CASA OF LANE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SQUAREONE VILLAGES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · Chambers Family Foundation · First Fruits Foundation · McKay Family Foundation · United Way of Lane County · The Woodard Family Foundation · Larson Family Foundation · R & M Clark Family Foundation · Lane Community Health Council · Meyer Memorial Trust · Alton F Baker Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Crow Farm Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Womenspace — 62% of income from government
- Mercy Corps — 47% of income from government
- Friends of the Child Advocacy Center Inc — 33% of income from government
- Sheltercare — 18% of income from government
- Sponsors Inc — 8% of income from government
- McKenzie River Trust — 8% of income from government
- Food for Lane County — 5% of income from government
- Squareone Villages — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.