Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Crossroads Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$250k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Human Services$230kReligion$197kHealth$185kCrime & Legal$130kCommunity Improvement$105kPhilanthropy$95kHousing & Shelter$80kEducation$65kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $245k
$20,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$5.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OPTIONS Inc$30,000
Ladies of Charity$30,000
Metropolitan Center for Women$20,000
Jefferson Council on Aging$20,000
Family Ministries$20,000
Savannah Smiles$20,000
Child Advocacy Services$20,000
Magnolia Community Services$20,000
First Baptist Chruch Food Pantry$20,000
Righteous Rides$15,000
Animal Rescue New Orleans$10,000
Morning Star Ranch$10,000
Harry Thompson Center$10,000
Leader Dogs for the Blind$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $225k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Leader Dogs for the Blind: $5k → 8%Jefferson Council on Aging: $30k → 15%Leader Dogs for the Blind: $5k → 8%Jefferson Council on Aging: $20k → 15%OPTIONS Inc: $30k → 20%OPTIONS Inc: $20k → 20%Jefferson Council on Aging: $20k → 15%OPTIONS Inc: $20k → 20%OPTIONS Inc: $20k → 20%OPTIONS Inc: $20k → 20%Covenant House: $10k → 23%Harry Thompson Center: $10k → 23%Harry Tompson Center: $5k → 23%Harry Tompson Center: $5k → 23%Harry Tompson Center: $5k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 19 repeat orgs$86k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
7

Total granted

$1.2M
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+32%

Still filing today

68%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesPhilanthropyAnimalsCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CHILD ADVOCACY SERVICES INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $130k · revenue +7%
  • OI
    OPTIONS INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $110k · revenue +0%
  • LO
    LADIES OF CHARITY KNOXVILLE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $105k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • FB
    First Baptist - Hurricane Relief
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • SM
    Saint Michael School
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • CH
    COVENANT HOUSE NEW ORLEANS
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -23%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Louisiana Alliance for Nonprofits

To strengthen, promote, and build the capacity of louisiana's nonprofit sector through education, advocacy, and member services.

Philanthropy
2
Casa - New Orleans

Casa - new orleans trains volunteers to become court appointed special advocates for abused and neglected children in the juvenile justice system.

3
Capital Area Alliance for the Homeless

The Capital Area Alliance for the Homeless (CAAH) holds the fundamental belief that everyone, no matter how deprived in circumstances of housing and necessities is valued, entitled to dignity and respect, and deserving of community…

Community Improvement
4
K9 Hurricane's Heroes Inc

K9 hurricane's heroes, a federally recognized, non-profit organization, provides "retired law enforcement and military dogs" with subsidized veterinary care so they can live a long and healthy life. often these incredible dogs are the…

Animals
5
Trap Dat Cat Inc

Trap dat cat, based in new orleans, is dedicated to enhancing the welfare of community cats through targeted spay/neuter initiatives, low-cost medical care, and adoption services, supported entirely by volunteers and donor contributions.

Animals
6
Acadiana Outreach Center Inc

Acadiana outreach center, inc. provides shelter and support to help the poor and homeless rebuild their lives.

Religion
7
Louisiana Disabled Persons Housing Corp

Provide low cost housing to handicapped adults

8
Travelers Aid Society of Greater New Orleans

Travelers aid society is committed to preventing homelessness and to helping homeless or stranded families and individuals regain a self-sufficient lifestyle. in brief, travelers aid society provides crisis counseling and job search…

Human Services
9
Louisiana Guardianship Services Inc

The company is organized to act as curator or continuing tutor for the person, property, or both, of adults in louisiana in need of full or limited interdiction or continuing tutorship.

Unclassified
10
Neighborhood Housing Services of New Orleans Inc

Neighborhood housing services of new orleans, inc. revitalizes communities by increasing the number of homeowners and transforming vacant or substandard properties into sustainable homeownership. we improve quality of life through informed…

11
Care Net Center of Greater Orleans

Pregnancy counseling

Unclassified
12
New Orleans Family Justice Alliance

The organization is a partnership of agencies dedicated to ending family violence, child abuse, sexual assault, and stalking through prevention and coordinated response by providing comprehensive client-centered, empowerment services in a…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Metro Centers for Community Advocacy Inc and the most unlike its peers is Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States Dept of Louisiana. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
16/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FAMILY MINISTRIES INC — $132,000 · OtherFAMILY MINISTRIES INCMAGNOLIA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $70,000 · OtherMAGNOLIA COMMUNITY SERVICES INCCatholic Charities — $60,000 · OtherCatholic CharitiesFirst Baptist Christian School — $55,000 · OtherFirst Baptist Christian SchoolFirst Baptist - Food Pantry — $40,000 · OtherFirst Baptist - Food PantryFirst Baptist - Hurricane Relief — $20,000 · OtherFirst Baptist Chruch Food Pantry — $20,000 · OtherDREW PET FOUNDATION INC — $17,000 · OtherANIMAL RESCUE NEW ORLEANS INC — $31,000 · OtherANIMAL RESCUE NEW ORLEANS INC+7 more — $55,000 · Other+7 moreOPTIONS INC — $110,000 · Human ServicesOPTIONS INCMETRO CENTERS FOR COMMUNITY ADVOCACY INC — $90,000 · Human ServicesMETRO CENTERS FOR COMMUNITY …JEFFERSON COUNCIL ON AGING INC — $70,000 · Human ServicesJEFFERSON COUNCIL ON AGING I…THE HARRY TOMPSON CENTER INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesTHE HARRY TOMPSON CENTER INC+2 more — $20,000 · Human Services+2 moreCHILD ADVOCACY SERVICES INC — $130,000 · Civil RightsCHILD ADVOC…LADIES OF CHARITY KNOXVILLE — $105,000 · Community ImprovementLADIES OF…SAVANNAH SMILES INC — $85,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $1,000 · PhilanthropyRIGHTEOUS RIDES — $55,000 · ReligionOZANAM INN — $50,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$500,000Human Services$315,000Civil Rights$130,000Community Improvement$105,000Philanthropy$86,000Religion$55,000Housing & Shelter$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHILD ADVOCACY SERVICES INC — $130,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetOPTIONS INC — $110,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetLADIES OF CHARITY KNOXVILLE — $105,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetMETRO CENTERS FOR COMMUNITY ADVOCACY INC — $90,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetSAVANNAH SMILES INC — $85,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetMAGNOLIA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $70,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJEFFERSON COUNCIL ON AGING INC — $70,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetRIGHTEOUS RIDES — $55,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetOZANAM INN — $50,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetANIMAL RESCUE NEW ORLEANS INC — $31,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetTHE HARRY TOMPSON CENTER INC — $25,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES DEPT OF LOUISIANA — $10,000 over 3y, 8.8% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE NEW ORLEANS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CAJUN NAVY RELIEF INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTAKE PAWS RESCUE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLions Clubs International Foundation — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILD ADVOCACY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds OPTIONS INC
  • Who funds LADIES OF CHARITY KNOXVILLE
  • Who funds METRO CENTERS FOR COMMUNITY ADVOCACY INC
  • Who funds SAVANNAH SMILES INC
  • Who funds MAGNOLIA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds JEFFERSON COUNCIL ON AGING INC
  • Who funds RIGHTEOUS RIDES
  • Who funds OZANAM INN
  • Who funds ANIMAL RESCUE NEW ORLEANS INC
  • Who funds THE HARRY TOMPSON CENTER INC
  • Who funds VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES DEPT OF LOUISIANA
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE NEW ORLEANS
  • Who funds LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND
  • Who funds THE CAJUN NAVY RELIEF INC
  • Who funds TAKE PAWS RESCUE
  • Who funds Lions Clubs International Foundation

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater New Orleans FoundationLA25.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater New Orleans Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Oscar J Tolmas Charitable Trust · Keller Family Foundation · The Almar Foundationdba The Alden and Margaret Laborde Foundation · Baptist Community Ministries · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Crossroads Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Crossroads Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Crossroads Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph