Skip to content
Crosser Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Crosser Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2017 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$367k
Granted FY2017
11
Grants FY2017
2
States reached
$113k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2017 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under $10k5 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $331k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$112,500
ST VINCENT FOUNDATION$83,250
LAFAYETTE PARKS FOUNDATION$75,000
PREVAIL INC$60,000
GLEANERS FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL IN$10,000
GREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FDTN$10,000
HOPE ACADEMY$5,000
AGAPE THERAPEUTIC RIDING$4,000
TRINITY FREE CLINIC$2,500
AYS INC$2,500
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS$2,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PREVAIL INC: $60k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
03the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $112,500 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FDTN: $10,000 · OtherGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FDTNGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL IN: $10,000 · OtherGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL IN+3 more: $8,500 · Other+3 moreST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $83,250 · HealthST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDA…+1 more: $2,500 · HealthLAFAYETTE PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 · PhilanthropyLAFAYETTE PARKS FOUNDAT…PREVAIL INC OF HAMILTON COUNTY: $60,000 · Human ServicesPREVAIL INC OF HAM…THE HOPE ACADEMY INC: $5,000 · Education
Other$141,000Health$85,750Philanthropy$75,000Human Services$60,000Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $83,250 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLAFAYETTE PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetPREVAIL INC OF HAMILTON COUNTY: $60,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetAGAPE THERAPEUTIC RIDING RESOURCES: $4,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTH CENTRAL INDIANA: $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Samerian Foundation I…Hamilton County Commu…Nicholas H Noyes Jr M…United Way of Central…Lumina Foundation for…Central Indiana Commu…Natl Christian Charit…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Samerian Foundation IncIN13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Samerian Foundation Inc · Hamilton County Community Foundation Inc · Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · United Way of Central Indiana Inc · Lumina Foundation for Education Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Crosser Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Crosser Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Crosser Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home