Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cross Charitable Foundation Attn John R Clark

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
110
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$6.5MAnimals$4.3MHuman Services$2.4MYouth Development$805kEducation$756kHousing & Shelter$582kHealth$515kArts & Culture$503kOther$0
02FY2024 · 110 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k93 grants · $1.9M
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $585k
$20,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$58M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OGDEN-WEBER ATC FOUNDATION$100,000
EARTHJUSTICE$75,000
PAWS OF JACKSON HOLE$60,000
SNAKE RIVER ANIMAL SHELTER$50,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF EAST JEFFER$50,000
JEFFERSON LAND TRUST$50,000
AMERICAN PRAIRIE RESERVE$50,000
THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND$50,000
SALT LAKE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDAT$50,000
LANTERN HOUSE$50,000
PROGRESSIVE ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY$40,000
OLYMPIC PENINSULA YMCA$40,000
UNIVERSITY WOMEN'S FOUNDATION$40,000
DUCKS UNLIMITED INC$40,000
NUZZLES CO$35,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%K9 CARE MONTANA: $15k → 11%CENTER POLE: $15k → 23%OLYMPIC PENINSULA YMCA: $88k → 12%CLIMB WYOMING: $35k → 10%OLYMPIC PENINSULA YMCA: $40k → 12%CLIMB WYOMING: $30k → 10%FLORENCE CRITTENTON HOME SERVICES: $15k → 9%CHILD BRIDGE: $15k → 18%OLYMPIC PENINSULA YMCA: $40k → 12%CLIMB WYOMING: $30k → 10%FLORENCE CRITTENTON HOME SERVICES: $15k → 9%CHILD BRIDGE: $15k → 18%OLYMPIC PENINSULA YMCA: $15k → 12%CLIMB WYOMING: $30k → 10%CLIMB WYOMING: $30k → 10%YCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $30k → 9%CLIMB WYOMING: $30k → 10%YCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $30k → 9%CLIMB WYOMING: $30k → 10%JANNUS INC: $25k → 8%YMCA MISSOULA: $20k → 9%YCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $30k → 9%CLIMB WYOMING: $20k → 10%JANNUS INC: $25k → 8%INTERMOUNTAIN THERAPY ANIMALS: $25k → 8%JANNUS INC: $25k → 8%INTERMOUNTAIN THERAPY ANIMALS: $20k → 8%YCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $30k → 9%JANNUS INC: $20k → 8%INTERMOUNTAIN THERAPY ANIMALS: $20k → 8%YCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $30k → 9%INTERMOUNTAIN THERAPY ANIMALS: $20k → 8%YCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $30k → 9%INTERMOUNTAIN THERAPY ANIMALS: $20k → 8%INTERMOUNTAIN THERAPY ANIMALS: $20k → 8%YCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $25k → 9%SOUTH VALLEY SERVICES: $25k → 8%SOUTH VALLEY SANCTUARY: $25k → 8%SOUTH VALLEY SANCTUARY: $20k → 8%SOUTH VALLEY SANCTUARY: $20k → 8%SOUTH VALLEY SANCTUARY: $20k → 8%MOUNTAIN HOME MONTANA: $100k → 9%MOUNTAIN HOME MONTANA: $25k → 9%MOUNTAIN HOME MONTANA: $25k → 9%MOUNTAIN HOME MONTANA: $25k → 9%MOUNTAIN HOME MONTANA: $20k → 9%MOUNTAIN HOME MONTANA: $20k → 9%HELP CENTER INC: $20k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MT
MN
WI
MA
OR
WY
PA
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
TN
DC
LA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$18M · 176 repeat orgs$932k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

176 repeat relationships: 102 still active in FY2024, 74 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

176
77

Total granted

$18M
$817k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+30%

Still filing today

78%
66%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $115k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentAnimalsHuman ServicesHealthEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EARTHJUSTICE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $520k · revenue +82%
  • JL
    JEFFERSON LAND TRUST
    8× · 2017–2024 · $410k · revenue +186%
  • SA
    STAFFORD ANIMAL SHELTER
    7× · 2017–2023 · $394k · revenue +106%

Funded once

  • UO
    UWF OF JEFFERSON COUNTY
    one grant, 2023 · $39k
  • PF
    PHEASANTS FOREVER
    one grant, 2017 · $30k
  • AH
    ANIMAL HUMANE ASSOCIATION OF STAR V
    one grant, 2023 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Idaho Conservation League Inc

Icl's mission is to create a conservation community and pragmatic, enduring solutions that protect and restore the air you breathe, the water you drink, and the land and wildlife you love.

—
2
Montana Wildlife Federation

The montana wildlife federation is a statewide conservation organization dedicated to protecting wildlife, wildlife habitat, and public access for outdoor recreation.

Animals
3
Rocky Mountain Wild

Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…

Environment
4
Swan Valley Connections

Maintain the swan valley's unique natural resources and ensure that a vibrant human community can sustain itself through stewardship, education, economic viability, and conservation on public and private lands.

Environment
5
Cascadia Wildlands

Cascadia wildlands defends and restores cacasia's wild ecosystems in the forests,in the courts, and in the streets. we envision vast old-growth forests, rivers full of wild salmon, wolves howling in the backcountry, a stable climate, and…

Environment
6
Wyoming Outdoor Council

The wyoming outdoor council's mission is to protect wyoming's environment and quality of life now and for future generations.

Environment
7
Montana Trout Unlimited

To conserve, protect and restore montana's coldwater fisheries and watersheds.

Recreation & Sports
8
Utah Public Lands Alliance
Education
9
Wyoming Wildlife Federation

Wyoming wildlife federation delivers leadership in conservation for the state's wildlife, hunters, anglers, and conservationists through policy, education, advocacy, and habitat.

Animals
10
Montanas Outdoor Legacy Foundation

To collectively serve as a catalyst for engagement and bonding of people to our wildlife and public lands in montana through a sense of place, education, access, research and stewardship.

Environment
11
Land Trust of the Treasure Valley

To create oppurtunites for conservation of natural, scenic, historic, recreational and agricultural values of southwestern idaho's open spaces through collabarative efforts for current and future generations. the land trust indentifies…

Environment
12
Idaho Forest Restoration Partnership
Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ycc Family Crisis Center; the most unlike its peers is Hipeexnu Kii U Nuun Wisiix. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

196 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 196 of the 263 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
77
Early backer (in before they grew)
195/196
Grantees still filing
152/196
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OGDEN WEBER APPLIED TECHNOLOGY COLL: $305,000 · OtherFAMILY PROMISE OF GALLATIN COUNTY: $290,000 · OtherST ANNE'S CENTER: $260,000 · Other+93 more: $6,469,300 · Other+93 moreEARTHJUSTICE: $520,000 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICEJEFFERSON LAND TRUST: $410,000 · EnvironmentJEFFERSON LAND TRUSTAMERICAN PRAIRIE FOUNDATION: $370,000 · EnvironmentAMERICAN PRAIRIE FOUNDATIONTETON REGIONAL LAND TRUST INC: $320,000 · EnvironmentTETON REGIONAL LAND TRUST INCSagebrush Steppe Land Trust Inc: $292,000 · EnvironmentSagebrush Steppe Land Trust In…THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $260,000 · EnvironmentGREATER YELLOWSTONE COALITION: $255,000 · EnvironmentBLACKFOOT CHALLENGE INC: $206,000 · EnvironmentTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $205,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $170,000 · Environment+30 more: $1,903,500 · Environment+30 moreSTAFFORD ANIMAL SHELTER: $393,500 · AnimalsSTAFFORD ANIMAL SHELT…SNAKE RIVER ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $360,000 · AnimalsSNAKE RIVER ANIMAL SH…Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka PAWS: $330,000 · AnimalsProgressive Animal We…PAWS - PROVIDING ANIMAL WELFARE SERVICES: $230,000 · AnimalsPAWS - PROVIDING ANIM…Tautphaus Park Zoological SocietyInc: $218,000 · AnimalsTautphaus Park Zoolog…Animal Adoption Center Inc: $200,000 · AnimalsAnimal Adoption Cente…HEART OF THE VALLEY INC: $195,000 · AnimalsHEART OF THE VALLEY I…HUMANE SOCIETY OF UTAH: $170,000 · AnimalsCENTER VALLEY ANIMAL RESCUE: $139,700 · AnimalsAll About the Animals Coalition Inc: $135,000 · Animals+16 more: $1,091,500 · Animals+16 moreCLIMB DBA CLIMB WYOMING: $235,000 · Human ServicesCLIMB DBA C…MOUNTAIN HOME MONTANA INC: $215,000 · Human ServicesMOUNTAIN HO…YCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $205,000 · Human ServicesYCC FAMILY …OLYMPIC PENINSULA YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSN: $182,500 · Human ServicesOLYMPIC PEN…Intermountain Therapy Animals: $155,000 · Human ServicesIntermounta…SOUTH VALLEY SANCTUARY INC: $140,000 · Human ServicesSOUTH VALLE…JANNUS INC: $95,000 · Human ServicesABILITY FOUND CORPORATION: $90,000 · Human ServicesYWCA MISSOULA: $78,000 · Human ServicesCHILD BRIDGE INC: $75,000 · Human Services+13 more: $332,000 · Human Services+13 moreWEST YELLOWSTONE FOUNDATION: $260,000 · Community ImprovementWASATCH COMMUNITY GARDENS: $40,000 · Community ImprovementHOPA MOUNTAIN INC: $40,000 · Community ImprovementTHE CHRISTMAS BOX INTERNATIONAL: $20,000 · Community ImprovementSalt Lake Community College Foundation: $110,000 · EducationNeeds Beyond Medicine: $70,000 · EducationWYAKIN WARRIOR FOUNDATION INC: $55,000 · EducationMontana State University Foundation Inc: $35,000 · EducationKids on the Move Inc: $32,500 · EducationTeton County Library Foundation & Friends: $25,000 · EducationBig Brothers Big Sisters of Utah: $19,000 · EducationYOUTH FUTURES: $100,000 · HealthALLIANCE HOUSE INC: $80,000 · HealthUTAH HEALTH & HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT: $65,000 · HealthNAMI National: $55,000 · Health
Other$7,324,300Environment$4,911,500Animals$3,462,700Human Services$1,802,500Community Improvement$360,000Education$346,500Health$300,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $520,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetJEFFERSON LAND TRUST: $410,000 over 8y, 4.7% of budgetSTAFFORD ANIMAL SHELTER: $393,500 over 7y, 15% of budgetAMERICAN PRAIRIE FOUNDATION: $370,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetSNAKE RIVER ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $360,000 over 8y, 15% of budgetProgressive Animal Welfare Society aka PAWS: $330,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetTETON REGIONAL LAND TRUST INC: $320,000 over 6y, 6.3% of budgetSagebrush Steppe Land Trust Inc: $292,000 over 5y, 8.0% of budgetWEST YELLOWSTONE FOUNDATION: $260,000 over 8y, 11% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $260,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetST ANNE'S CENTER: $260,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetGREATER YELLOWSTONE COALITION: $255,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetCLIMB DBA CLIMB WYOMING: $235,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetPAWS - PROVIDING ANIMAL WELFARE SERVICES: $230,000 over 7y, 5.8% of budgetTautphaus Park Zoological SocietyInc: $218,000 over 8y, 23% of budgetMOUNTAIN HOME MONTANA INC: $215,000 over 6y, 6.8% of budgetTHE VITAL GROUND FOUNDATION INC: $210,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetBLACKFOOT CHALLENGE INC: $206,000 over 8y, 2.6% of budgetTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $205,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMONTANA CONSERVATION CORPS INC: $205,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetYCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $205,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetAnimal Adoption Center Inc: $200,000 over 8y, 5.3% of budgetMUSEUM OF IDAHO: $196,000 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetHEART OF THE VALLEY INC: $195,000 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetHENRYS FORK FOUNDATION INC: $185,000 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetOLYMPIC PENINSULA YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSN: $182,500 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetBIG SKY YOUTH EMPOWERMENT PROJECT INC: $180,000 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $170,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF UTAH: $170,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetGALLATIN VALLEY LAND TRUST: $157,500 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetIntermountain Therapy Animals: $155,000 over 8y, 4.6% of budgetWILDEARTH GUARDIANS: $155,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetYELLOWSTONE TO YUKON: $155,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetWESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECTS INC: $150,000 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetSOUTH VALLEY SANCTUARY INC: $140,000 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetTHRIVE INC: $140,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetGRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $140,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE TETON RIVER INC: $140,000 over 4y, 4.6% of budgetCENTER VALLEY ANIMAL RESCUE: $139,700 over 8y, 4.5% of budgetAll About the Animals Coalition Inc: $135,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetWESTERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $130,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetHAVEN: $125,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $125,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWASATCH ADAPTIVE SPORTS INC: $122,500 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetUTAH ANIMAL ADOPTION CENTER: $115,000 over 8y, 18% of budgetCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC: $110,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $110,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCentennial Valley Association Inc: $110,000 over 8y, 10% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds JEFFERSON LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds STAFFORD ANIMAL SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN PRAIRIE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SNAKE RIVER ANIMAL SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka PAWS ↗
  • Who funds TETON REGIONAL LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds Sagebrush Steppe Land Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds WEST YELLOWSTONE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ↗
  • Who funds ST ANNE'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GREATER YELLOWSTONE COALITION ↗
  • Who funds CLIMB DBA CLIMB WYOMING ↗
  • Who funds PAWS - PROVIDING ANIMAL WELFARE SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds Tautphaus Park Zoological SocietyInc ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN HOME MONTANA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE VITAL GROUND FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BLACKFOOT CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MONTANA CONSERVATION CORPS INC ↗
  • Who funds YCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Animal Adoption Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF IDAHO ↗
  • Who funds HEART OF THE VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds HENRYS FORK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OLYMPIC PENINSULA YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSN ↗
  • Who funds BIG SKY YOUTH EMPOWERMENT PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF UTAH ↗
  • Who funds GALLATIN VALLEY LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Intermountain Therapy Animals ↗
  • Who funds WILDEARTH GUARDIANS ↗
  • Who funds YELLOWSTONE TO YUKON ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dennis & Phyllis Washington FoundationMT66.9× affinity37 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation · Montana Community Foundation Inc · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · Treacy Foundation · Town Pump Charitable Foundation · The High Stakes Foundation · Gianforte Family Charitable Trust · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · Hemingway Foundation · Sample Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cross Charitable Foundation Attn John R Clark funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cross Charitable Foundation Attn John R Clark. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    58report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Cross Charitable Foundation Attn John R Clark?

    Find your warmest path to Cross Charitable Foundation Attn John R Clark through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 263 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cross Charitable Foundation Attn John R Clark’s filings →

    More from the funding graph