Skip to content

· Community foundation

Crockett Community Foundation

To promote and improve the quality of life in the city of crockett, california

$456k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$235k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$711kPublic Safety & Disaster$639kEducation$614kRecreation & Sports$494kEnvironment$140kYouth Development$72kPublic Benefit$29kHuman Services$24kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $373k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CARQUINEZ WOMENS CLUB$235,000
CROCKETT CARQUINEZ FIRE PROTECTION$137,767
CROCKETT COMM SVCS DISTRICT$49,932
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY LIBRARY$20,000
JOHN SWETT HIGH SCHOOL$9,099
CARQUINEZ MODEL RAILROAD SOCIETY$7,528
CROCKETT BSA$6,356
PORT COSTA CONSERVTORY$5,974
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%PORT COSTA CONSERVASTION SOCIETY: $54k → 9%PORT COSTA: $21k → 9%PORT COSTA CONSERVTION: $19k → 9%PORT COSTA CONSERVASTION SOCIETY: $19k → 9%PORT COSTA CONSERVASTION SOCIETY: $11k → 9%CARQUINEZ WOMENS CLUB: $235k → 9%CROCKETT COMM SVCS DISTRICT: $232k → 9%CROCKETT COMM SVCS DISTRICT: $205k → 9%CROCKETT COMM SVCS DISTRICT: $184k → 9%CROCKETT CARQUINEZ FIRE PROTECTION: $158k → 9%CROCKETT COMM SVCS DISTRICT: $145k → 9%CROCKETT CARQUINEZ FIRE PROTECTION: $139k → 9%CROCKETT CARQUINEZ FIRE PROTECTION: $138k → 9%CROCKETT COMM SVCS DISTRICT: $120k → 9%CARQUINEZ WOMENS CLUB: $80k → 9%CROCKETT COMM SVCS DISTRICT: $74k → 9%CROCKETT CARQUINEZ FIRE PROTECTION: $66k → 9%CROCKETT CARQUINEZ FIRE: $61k → 9%CARQUINEZ MODEL RAILROAD SOCIETY IN: $54k → 9%CROCKETT COMM SVCS DISTRICT: $50k → 9%CROCKETT RECREATION: $49k → 9%CROCKETT CARQUINEZ FIRE PROTECTION: $48k → 9%CARQUINEZ REGIONAL ENVIOR ED CENT I: $31k → 9%CROCKETT CARQUINEZ FIRE PROTECTION: $30k → 9%CROCKETT PUBLIC SERVICES: $29k → 9%LITTLE ROSES PRE-SCHOOL: $24k → 9%CARQUINEZ WOMENS CLUB: $23k → 9%CONTRA COSTA COUNTY LIBRARY: $20k → 9%CONTRA COSTA COUNTY LIBRARY: $20k → 9%CONTRA COSTA COUNTY LIBRARY: $20k → 9%CONTRA COSTA COUNTY LIBRARY: $20k → 9%CONTRA COSTA COUNTY LIBRARY: $20k → 9%CONTRA COSTA COUNTY LIBRARY: $20k → 9%CONTRA COSTA COUNTY LIBRARY: $20k → 9%CROCKETT BSA: $20k → 9%JOHN SWETT EDUCATION FND: $17k → 9%JOHN SWETT EDUCATION FND: $15k → 9%CARQUINEZ WOMENS CLUB: $15k → 9%JOHN SWETT EDUCATION FND: $14k → 9%CROCKETT BOY SCOUTS: $14k → 9%CROCKETT BOY SCOUTS: $13k → 9%CROCKETT BOY SCOUTS: $13k → 9%CARQUINEZ WOMENS CLUB: $13k → 9%CARQUINEZ WOMENS CLUB: $11k → 9%CARQUINEZ TOY TRAIN OPERATING MUSEU: $10k → 9%JOHN SWETT HIGH SCHOOL: $9k → 9%CROCKETT SWIM TEAM: $8k → 9%CARQUINEZ MODEL RAILROAD SOCIETY: $8k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 10 repeat orgs$151k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
7

Total granted

$2.6M
$151k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
0%

Still filing today

40%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’25
EnvironmentArts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CROCKETT COMM SVCS DISTRICT
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.0M
  • CC
    CROCKETT CARQUINEZ FIRE PROTECTION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $578k
  • CW
    CARQUINEZ WOMENS CLUB
    9× · 2017–2025 · $382k · revenue +177% · 44% of their budget

Funded once

  • CR
    CROCKETT RECREATION
    one grant, 2017 · $49k
  • CR
    CARQUINEZ REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION CENTER
    2× · 2019–2020 · $31k
  • CP
    CROCKETT PUBLIC SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2017 · $29k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Carrillo K-5 Magent School
Education
2
Creekside Parent Teacher Club

Provide supplies and equipment to classrooms, library books, and supplies which benefit all students and staff

Education
3
Creekside Boosters Club

to raise funds to support the athletic teams at Creekside Middle School

Recreation & Sports
4
Crystal Cove Conservancy

To promote educational and interpretative activities of the california state park system at crystal cove state park, support scientific studies, continue restoration of the historic district buildings and presentation of these subjects to…

Recreation & Sports
5
El Carmelo Elementary School Pta

to support students, staff and parents

—
6
Carlsbad High School Band Boosters

Assist with and support the marching band, drumline, jazz band, concert band and color guard programs at Carlsbad High School

Education
7
Marsh Creek Elementary Parents Club

Student enrichment programs

Education
8
Pta California Congress of Parents Teachers & Students Inc

we are an organization at an Elementary school

—
9
Santa Clara Parents Nursery

None

—
10
Coastwatch Wildlife Society
Science & Tech
11
Cortez Village Historical Society I

Education and historical

Arts & Culture
12
Coastal Grove Charter School Parent Organization

Raise money to support activities of coastal grove charter school.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Carquinez Model Railroad Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is John Swett Hs Band Boosters Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CROCKETT COMM SVCS DISTRICT: $1,009,643 · OtherCROCKETT COMM SVCS DISTRICTCROCKETT CARQUINEZ FIRE PROTECTION: $577,980 · OtherCROCKETT CARQUINEZ FIRE PROTECTIONCONTRA COSTA CNTY FLOOD CONTROL & WATER: $200,717 · OtherCONTRA COSTA CNTY FLOOD CONTROL & WATER+7 more: $311,283 · Other+7 moreCARQUINEZ WOMENS CLUB: $382,376 · EducationCARQUINEZ WOMEN…PORT COSTA CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $129,888 · EnvironmentCARQUINEZ REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION CENTER: $31,223 · EnvironmentCARQUINEZ MODEL RAILROAD SOCIETY INC: $67,514 · Arts & CultureJOHN SWETT HS BAND BOOSTERS INC: $5,178 · Arts & CultureCROCKETT SWIM TEAM: $7,891 · Recreation & SportsGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $5,065 · Youth Development
Other$2,099,623Education$382,376Environment$161,111Arts & Culture$72,692Recreation & Sports$7,891Youth Development$5,065

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCARQUINEZ WOMENS CLUB: $382,376 over 9y, 44% of budgetPORT COSTA CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $129,888 over 8y, 70% of budgetCARQUINEZ MODEL RAILROAD SOCIETY INC: $67,514 over 4y, 28% of budgetGOLDEN GATE AREA COUNCIL #023: $66,843 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetLITTLE ROSES PRESCHOOL: $24,047 over 1y, 13% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $5,065 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CARQUINEZ WOMENS CLUB ↗
  • Who funds PORT COSTA CONSERVATION SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds CARQUINEZ MODEL RAILROAD SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN GATE AREA COUNCIL #023 ↗
  • Who funds CARQUINEZ REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE ROSES PRESCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CROCKETT SWIM TEAM ↗
  • Who funds JOHN SWETT HS BAND BOOSTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

East Bay Community FoundationCA24.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: East Bay Community Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Crockett Community Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Crockett Community Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Crockett Community Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Crockett Community Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Crockett’s filings →

    More from the funding graph