· Community foundation
Crockett Community Foundation
To promote and improve the quality of life in the city of crockett, california
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $29k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $70k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $373k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CARQUINEZ WOMENS CLUB | $235,000 |
| CROCKETT CARQUINEZ FIRE PROTECTION | $137,767 |
| CROCKETT COMM SVCS DISTRICT | $49,932 |
| CONTRA COSTA COUNTY LIBRARY | $20,000 |
| JOHN SWETT HIGH SCHOOL | $9,099 |
| CARQUINEZ MODEL RAILROAD SOCIETY | $7,528 |
| CROCKETT BSA | $6,356 |
| PORT COSTA CONSERVTORY | $5,974 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +64% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCROCKETT COMM SVCS DISTRICT9× · 2017–2025 · $1.0M
- CCCROCKETT CARQUINEZ FIRE PROTECTION8× · 2018–2025 · $578k
- CWCARQUINEZ WOMENS CLUB9× · 2017–2025 · $382k · revenue +97% · 41% of their budget
Funded once
- CRCROCKETT RECREATIONone grant, 2017 · $49k
- CRCARQUINEZ REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION CENTER2× · 2019–2020 · $31k
- CPCROCKETT PUBLIC SERVICES INCone grant, 2017 · $29k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide supplies and equipment to classrooms, library books, and supplies which benefit all students and staff
to raise funds to support the athletic teams at Creekside Middle School
To promote educational and interpretative activities of the california state park system at crystal cove state park, support scientific studies, continue restoration of the historic district buildings and presentation of these subjects to…
to support students, staff and parents
Assist with and support the marching band, drumline, jazz band, concert band and color guard programs at Carlsbad High School
Student enrichment programs
we are an organization at an Elementary school
None
Education and historical
Raise money to support activities of coastal grove charter school.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Carquinez Model Railroad Society Inc and the most unlike its peers is John Swett Hs Band Boosters Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CARQUINEZ WOMENS CLUB ↗
- Who funds PORT COSTA CONSERVATION SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds CARQUINEZ MODEL RAILROAD SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds GOLDEN GATE AREA COUNCIL #023 ↗
- Who funds CARQUINEZ REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION CENTER ↗
- Who funds LITTLE ROSES PRESCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CROCKETT SWIM TEAM ↗
- Who funds JOHN SWETT HS BAND BOOSTERS INC ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: East Bay Community Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Crockett Community Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Crockett Community Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Crockett Community Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.