Skip to content
Crimsonbridge Foundation Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Private foundation

Crimsonbridge Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
67
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$4.3MCommunity Improvement$499kHuman Services$390kReligion$373kPublic Benefit$361kEnvironment$335kEmployment$224kYouth Development$223kOther$0
02FY2025 · 67 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $60k
  • $10k–50k37 grants · $842k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $662k
$15,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LATINO STUDENT FUND$100,000
TEACHERS COLLEGE COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY$100,000
SKILLUP COALITION$100,000
SPUR LOCAL$95,000
AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR BOYS AND MEN$60,000
ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON CATHOLIC SCHOOLS$57,000
SHE SHOULD RUN$50,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES USA$50,000
MERIT AMERICA$50,000
RUNNING START$45,000
THE ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON - CATHOLIC SCHOOLS OFFICE$45,000
ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY COLLEGE TRUSTEES$45,000
BOSTON COLLEGE$45,000
CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ARLINGTON$40,000
REPRESENTWOMEN INC$40,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $460k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SHE SHOULD RUN: $50k → 17%LIBERTY'S PROMISE: $10k → 9%CAMPAGNA CENTER: $10k → 9%CAMPAGNA CENTER: $10k → 9%SHE SHOULD RUN: $20k → 14%SHE SHOULD RUN: $15k → 14%SHE SHOULD RUN: $15k → 14%SHE SHOULD RUN: $10k → 14%SHE SHOULD RUN: $10k → 14%SHE SHOULD RUN: $5k → 14%SHE SHOULD RUN: $3k → 14%MAMATOTO VILLAGE: $1k → 14%HOMES NOT BORDERS: $1k → 11%MAMATOTO VILLAGE INC: $500 → 14%NEW FUTURES: $25k → 14%NEW FUTURES: $20k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON INC: $20k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON INC: $15k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON: $15k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON INC: $10k → 14%COMMUNITY BRIDGES: $5k → 8%AYUDA: $10k → 14%WASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 14%WASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%WASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION INC: $4k → 14%WASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION INC: $144 → 14%MERIT AMERICA: $50k → 14%WASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION INC: $30k → 14%NEW FUTURES: $20k → 14%CENTER FOR NONPROFIT ADVANCEMENT: $10k → 14%NEW FUTURES: $20k → 14%CENTER FOR NONPROFIT ADVANCEMENT: $10k → 14%WASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%NEW FUTURES: $5k → 14%CENTER FOR NONPROFIT ADVANCEMENT: $5k → 14%CENTER FOR NONPROFIT ADVANCEMENT: $5k → 14%CENTER FOR NONPROFIT ADVANCEMENT: $895 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
IN
PA
NJ
CA
MO
VA
MD
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.7M · 110 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

110 repeat relationships: 44 still active in FY2025, 66 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

110
57

Total granted

$5.7M
$795k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+20%

Still filing today

53%
49%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $579k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LS
    LATINO STUDENT FUND
    7× · 2019–2025 · $708k · revenue +41%
  • SL
    SPUR LOCAL INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $243k · revenue +31%
  • MC
    MONTGOMERY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $160k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • KN
    KIPP NEW YORK INC
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue -7%
  • SA
    SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA
    one grant, 2024 · $100k
  • NC
    NATIONAL CATHOLIC EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2024 · $80k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
2
Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments

Create a more accessible, sustainable, prosperous and livable national capital region by being a discussion forum, expert resource, issue advocate, and catalyst for action.

Public Benefit
3
Council for Court Excellence

Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.

—
4
Ingenuity Prep

Ingenuity prep public charter school was formed to prepare students to succeed in college and beyond as impactful civiic leaders.

Education
5
Dc Preparatory Academy

Dc prep's mission is to bridge the educational divide in washington, dc by increasing the number of students from underserved communities with the academic preparation and personal character to succeed in competitive high schools and…

Education
6
Cesar Chavez Public Charter School for Public Policy

To prepare students to succeed in competitive colleges and to empower them to use public policy to create a more just, free, and equal world.

Education
7
Greater Washington Partnership

We identify shared opportunities and core challenges and offer solutions to the region's most critical issues including skills and talent, regional mobility, infrastructure and inclusive economic growth.

Recreation & Sports
8
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
9
Achievement Preparatory Academy Public Charter School

To prepare students to excel as high-achieving scholars and leaders in high school, college and beyond.

Education
10
Institute for Experiential Learning Inc

The mission of the washington internship institute is to foster students' intellectual, personal, and professional development through individually tailored, quality internships and challenging academic coursework that take full advantage…

Education
11
National Alliance of Concurrent Enrollment Partnerships Inc

Advancing a national community to foster equity in dual and concurrent enrollment through accreditation, advocacy, research, and professional development.

Education
12
The Mclean School of Maryland Inc

Mclean school's small classes and abilities model prepare bright students in kindergarten through twelfth grade, including those with dyslexia, anxiety, and attention issues, for college success.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grantmakers for Education; the most unlike its peers is Running Start. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

98 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 98 of the 186 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
20
Early backer (in before they grew)
97/98
Grantees still filing
64/98
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LATINO STUDENT FUND: $708,000 · EducationLATINO STUDENT FUNDACHIEVING THE DREAM INC: $175,000 · EducationACHIEVING THE DREAM INCMONTGOMERY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $160,000 · EducationEDSOURCE INC: $150,000 · EducationCRISTO REY NETWORK: $140,000 · EducationKIPP FOUNDATION: $140,000 · EducationTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $140,000 · EducationCOLLEGIATE DIRECTIONS INC: $130,000 · EducationGENERATION HOPE: $125,000 · Education+28 more: $1,197,163 · Education+28 moreASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY COLLEGE TRUSTEES: $145,000 · OtherASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY COLLEGE TRUSTEESNASPA - CENTER FOR FIRST-GENERATION STUDENT SUCCESS: $135,550 · OtherGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY - CENTER FOR PUBLIC & NONPROFIT LEADERSHIP: $105,000 · OtherTHE ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON - CATHOLIC SCHOOLS OFFICE: $100,000 · OtherSCHOLARSHIP AMERICA: $100,000 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON CATHOLIC SCHOOLS: $97,000 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON: $90,000 · Other+107 more: $1,921,919 · Other+107 moreSHE SHOULD RUN: $127,500 · Human ServicesNEW FUTURES: $90,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON: $60,000 · Human ServicesWASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $54,144 · Human ServicesMERIT AMERICA: $50,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR NONPROFIT ADVANCEMENT: $30,895 · Human ServicesTHE CAMPAGNA CENTER INC: $20,000 · Human Services+5 more: $28,500 · Human ServicesSPUR LOCAL INC: $242,580 · PhilanthropyFriends of Anacostia Park: $20,000 · Philanthropy+4 more: $13,250 · PhilanthropyCasey Trees: $55,000 · EnvironmentNature Forward: $55,000 · EnvironmentRock Creek Conservancy Inc: $46,000 · EnvironmentWard 8 Woods Conservancy Inc: $40,000 · EnvironmentTHE POTOMAC CONSERVANCY INC: $35,000 · EnvironmentECOACTION ARLINGTON INC: $20,000 · EnvironmentANACOSTIA WATERSHED SOCIETY INC: $15,000 · Environment+1 more: $500 · EnvironmentRunning Start: $95,000 · Youth DevelopmentIMENTOR INC: $65,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS ON THE RUN - DC: $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentCITY BLOSSOMS INC: $20,500 · Youth DevelopmentLATIN AMERICAN YOUTH CENTER: $18,600 · Youth DevelopmentGirl Scout Council of the Nation's Capital: $15,000 · Youth Development+1 more: $500 · Youth DevelopmentREPRESENTWOMEN INC: $75,000 · Civil Rights+1 more: $1,000 · Civil Rights
Education$3,065,163Other$2,694,469Human Services$461,039Philanthropy$275,830Environment$266,500Youth Development$249,600Civil Rights$76,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLATINO STUDENT FUND: $708,000 over 7y, 16% of budgetSPUR LOCAL INC: $242,580 over 5y, 11% of budgetACHIEVING THE DREAM INC: $175,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetMONTGOMERY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $160,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetEDSOURCE INC: $150,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY COLLEGE TRUSTEES: $145,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetCRISTO REY NETWORK: $140,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetKIPP FOUNDATION: $140,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $140,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGIATE DIRECTIONS INC: $130,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetSHE SHOULD RUN: $127,500 over 7y, 7.0% of budgetGENERATION HOPE: $125,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetKIPP NEW YORK INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetIGNITE: $100,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetRunning Start: $95,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetNEW FUTURES: $90,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetREPRESENTWOMEN INC: $75,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetLITERACY COUNCIL OF FREDERICK COUNTY INC: $65,000 over 5y, 4.8% of budgetIMENTOR INC: $65,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLEADERSHIP GREATER WASHINGTON: $62,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetTHE FAMILY PLACE PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL: $60,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR BOYS AND MEN: $60,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON: $60,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLiteracy Council of Northern Virginia Inc: $58,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetWASHINGTON ENGLISH CENTER: $57,500 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetEXCELENCIA IN EDUCATION INC: $57,500 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCasey Trees: $55,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNature Forward: $55,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetWASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $54,144 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetSPARK THE JOURNEY: $50,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARLOS ROSARIO INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL INC: $47,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRock Creek Conservancy Inc: $46,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetIDENTITY INC: $45,524 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLEADERSHIP ROUNDTABLE INC: $45,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCOLLEGETRACKS INC: $45,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetYEAR UP INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWard 8 Woods Conservancy Inc: $40,000 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetTHE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE NATIVES INC: $38,000 over 2y, 8.8% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN - DC: $35,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetMontgomery Coalition for Adult English Literacy: $35,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCATHOLIC PARTNERSHIP SCHOOLS CAMDEN: $35,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE POTOMAC CONSERVANCY INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetGirls Rock DC Inc: $32,000 over 4y, 5.4% of budgetCENTER FOR NONPROFIT ADVANCEMENT: $30,895 over 4y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LATINO STUDENT FUND ↗
  • Who funds SPUR LOCAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ACHIEVING THE DREAM INC ↗
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EDSOURCE INC ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY COLLEGE TRUSTEES ↗
  • Who funds CRISTO REY NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds KIPP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGIATE DIRECTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds SHE SHOULD RUN ↗
  • Who funds GENERATION HOPE ↗
  • Who funds KIPP NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds SKILLUP COALITION ↗
  • Who funds IGNITE ↗
  • Who funds Teachers College Columbia University ↗
  • Who funds Running Start ↗
  • Who funds NEW FUTURES ↗
  • Who funds REPRESENTWOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds LITERACY COUNCIL OF FREDERICK COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds IMENTOR INC ↗
  • Who funds LEADERSHIP GREATER WASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds THE FAMILY PLACE PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR BOYS AND MEN ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds Literacy Council of Northern Virginia Inc ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON ENGLISH CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Morris and Gwendo…Greater Washington Co…Philip L Graham Fund …Clark-Winchcole Found…Clark Charitable Foun…Nora Roberts Foundati…Eugene & Agnes E Meye…United Way of the Nat…The Community Foundat…Robert I Schattner Fo…John Edward Fowler Me…Hattie M Strong Found…
The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz FoundationDC73.5× affinity36 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · Clark Charitable Foundation Inc Dba a James & Alice B Clark Foundation · Nora Roberts Foundation · Eugene & Agnes E Meyer Foundation · United Way of the National Capital Area · The Community Foundation for Northern Virginia Inc · Robert I Schattner Foundation Inc aka Schattner Foundation · John Edward Fowler Memorial Foundation · Hattie M Strong Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Crimsonbridge Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Crimsonbridge Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Defensores De La Cuenca: 100% of income from government
  • Rock Creek Conservancy Inc: 60% of income from government
  • Afrithrive Inc: 41% of income from government
  • Nature Forward: 32% of income from government
  • Anacostia Watershed Society Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Identity Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Everymind Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College: 3% of income from government
  • Year Up Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Achieving the Dream Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Rutgers University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
34report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Crimsonbridge Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Crimsonbridge Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 186 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Crimsonbridge’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home