Skip to content

· Private foundation

Crescent-Janko Masonic Foundation

Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$112k
Granted FY2018
20
Grants FY2018
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Human Services$85kYouth Development$69kHealth$25kEducation$10kHousing & Shelter$10kCrime & Legal$8kEnvironment$7kRecreation & Sports$5kOther$0
02FY2018 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAMILIES HELPING FAMILIES$9,500
FOUR OAKS$9,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$7,500
Individual grant recipient$7,500
SALVATION ARMY$7,500
ST LUKES HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION$7,000
TANAGER PLACE$6,500
WAYPOINT MADGE PHILLIPS CTR$6,500
BIG BROTHERSBIG SISTERS$6,000
FOUNDATION 2 SHELTER$5,500
ARC OF EAST CENTRAL IOWA$5,500
COMMUNITY HEALTH FREE CLINIC$5,500
TOYS FOR TOTS$5,000
CEDAR RAPIDS POLICE DEPARTMENT$5,000
INDIAN CREEK NATURE CENTER$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FAMILIES HELPING FAMILIES: $10k → 9%FAMILIES HELPING FAMILIES: $7k → 9%FOUR OAKS: $9k → 9%FOUR OAKS: $9k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$210k · 20 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
2

Total granted

$210k
$12k

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
HealthHuman ServicesEducationEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FOUR OAKS FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES
    2× · 2017–2018 · $18k · revenue +32%
  • FH
    FAMILIES HELPING FAMILIES
    2× · 2017–2018 · $17k · revenue +1%
  • SL
    ST LUKE'S HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $16k · revenue +113%

Funded once

  • CI
    CLOTHE-A-CHILD INC
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
  • HE
    HACAP EXCELSIOR MISSLE SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
2
Orchard Place

Our mission at orchard place is "developing strong futures" for the children and youth of iowa. we do this by providing a continuum of services to our clients who deal with mental and behavioral health challenges.

Health
3
Central Iowa Hospital Corporation

Improving the health of the community through healing, caring and teaching.

Health
4
Community Health Centers of Southeastern Iowa Inc

To provide primary health care to residents of the greater se iowa region, especially those individuals/families with limited resources or with other barriers to health care. see schedule o for additional information.

Health
5
Iowa Physicians Clinic Medical Foundation

To improve the health of the people and communities we serve.

Health
6
Central Iowa Health System

Improving the health of the community through healing, caring and teaching.

Health
7
University of Iowa Facilities Corporation

The university of iowa facilities corporation acquires and holds property for the benefit and use of the university of iowa.

—
8
Chatham Oaks Inc

To provide a continuum of care that includes safe, supportive, person driven residential treatment options to individuals with mental illness and/or disabilities improving quality of life and enhancing self-sufficiency to support the…

—
9
Mid-Iowa Community Action Inc

Mica helps families experencing poverty meet their needs, build on their strengths, and achieve their goals.

Community Improvement
10
Unity Healthcare Foundation

To provide financial assistance to unity healthcare to help enable it to carry out its exempt function of providing health care to the community.

Philanthropy
11
Iowa Health System

To improve the health of the people and communities we serve.

Health
12
Iowa Credit Union Foundation

Founded in 1995 as the philanthropic arm of the iowa credit union league and guided by the credit union philosophy of "people helping people", the iowa credit union foundation (the foundation) works to champion financial well-being for…

Unclassified
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Four Oaks Family and Children's Services; the most unlike its peers is Miracles in Motion Therapeutic Equestrian Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TOYS FOR TOTS: $20,000 · OtherTOYS FOR TOTSSALVATION ARMY: $12,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYIndividual grant recipient: $12,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $12,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBWAYPOINT MADGE PHILLIPS CTR: $11,000 · OtherWAYPOINT MADGE PHILLIPS CTRBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL IOWA: $10,500 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL IOWAFOUNDATION 2 SHELTER: $10,000 · OtherFOUNDATION 2 SHELTERCEDAR RAPIDS POLICE DEPARTMENT: $8,000 · OtherCEDAR RAPIDS POLICE DEPARTMENTHD YOUTH CENTER: $8,000 · OtherHD YOUTH CENTERCLOTHE-A-CHILD INC: $7,500 · OtherCLOTHE-A-CHILD INCIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherGIRLS SCOUTS OF EASTERN IOWA: $5,000 · OtherHAWKEYE AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $5,000 · OtherMIRACLES IN MOTION THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC: $4,500 · Other+1 more: $4,000 · OtherST LUKE'S HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION: $15,500 · HealthST LUKE'S HEALTH C…TANAGER PLACE: $11,000 · HealthTANAGER PLACECOMMUNITY HEALTH FREE CLINIC: $9,500 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH F…FOUR OAKS FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $18,000 · Human ServicesFOUR OAKS FAMILY …FAMILIES HELPING FAMILIES: $16,500 · Human ServicesFAMILIES HELPING …THE ARC OF EAST CENTRAL IOWA: $10,000 · EducationINDIAN CREEK NATURE CENTER: $6,500 · Environment
Other$134,500Health$36,000Human Services$34,500Education$10,000Environment$6,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOUR OAKS FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $18,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILIES HELPING FAMILIES: $16,500 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetST LUKE'S HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION: $15,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTANAGER PLACE: $11,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL IOWA: $10,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE ARC OF EAST CENTRAL IOWA: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH FREE CLINIC: $9,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetINDIAN CREEK NATURE CENTER: $6,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHAWKEYE AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMIRACLES IN MOTION THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC: $4,500 over 2y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOUR OAKS FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds FAMILIES HELPING FAMILIES ↗
  • Who funds ST LUKE'S HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TANAGER PLACE ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL IOWA ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF EAST CENTRAL IOWA ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH FREE CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds INDIAN CREEK NATURE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HAWKEYE AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds MIRACLES IN MOTION THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alliant Energy Foundation IncWI21.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · The McIntyre Foundation · GreenState Credit Union · Greater Cedar Rapids Community Foundation · Steve and Marybeth Allsop Voice of Hope Foundation · Carleen and Eugene Grandon Charitable Foundation · The Hall-Perrine Foundation · United Fire Group Foundation · The Accel Foundation · Dupaco RW Hoefer Foundation · Rohde Family Charitable Foundation · First Federal Credit Union Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Crescent-Janko Masonic Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Crescent-Janko Masonic Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Crescent-Janko Masonic Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Crescent-Janko Masonic Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Crescent-Janko Masonic’s filings →

    More from the funding graph