How much did THE MCINTYRE FOUNDATION grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 55% of THE MCINTYRE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 52 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k40 grants · $196k
$10k–50k11 grants · $174k
$50k–250k1 grant · $75k

$5,300

Median grant

States reached

$13M

Total assets

Anchored by a single position — about 99% of reported assets are held in United Fire And Casualty.

Largest grants

UNITED WAY OF EAST CENTRAL IOWA$74,800
FOUR OAKS$41,100
UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION$27,000
TANAGER PLACE$18,000
COMMUNITY HEALTH FREE CLINIC$11,500
WILLIS DADY EMERGENCY SHELTER$11,500
WAYPOINT$11,500
MATHEW 25 MINISTRY HUB$11,500
CEDAR VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$11,500
THE KIRKWOOD FOUNDATION$10,700
MERCY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$10,000
CEREBRAL PALSY RESEARCH CENTER$10,000
CEDAR RAPIDS PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION$9,000
CORNELL COLLEGE$9,000
MOUNT MERCY UNIVERSITY$9,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $71k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$6.2M · 58 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

58 repeat relationships — 51 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$6.2M

$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%

+71%

Still filing today

50%

33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Arts & CultureEducationHealthEnvironmentPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

TP
TANAGER PLACE
8× · 2018–2025 · $243k · revenue +52%
CV
CEDAR VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
8× · 2018–2025 · $160k · revenue +72%
CH
COMMUNITY HEALTH FREE CLINIC
8× · 2018–2025 · $155k · revenue +89%

Funded once

LO
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS-HARD WON NOT
one grant, 2019 · $25k
PM
PROSPECT MEADOWSgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +71%
FP
FRANKLIN PREPATORY ACADEMY
one grant, 2018 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Common Good Iowa

Common good iowa engages iowans to create and advocate for research-based public policy that makes life better and more equitable for all who make iowa home.

—

University of Iowa Facilities Corporation

The university of iowa facilities corporation acquires and holds property for the benefit and use of the university of iowa.

—

Iowa City Area Chamber of Commerce

Our mission is to inspire the iowa city area to be greater by: 1) elevating business, 2) investing in strategic initiatives, and 3) advocating for the economic resiliency of the greater community.

—

Central Indiana Corporate

The central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is transforming our regional economy, bringing together the ceos of central indiana's largest and most civically engaged employers and university presidents to advance "big picture"…

Community Improvement

Iowa Credit Union Foundation

Icuf's mission is to champion financial well-being for all.

Unclassified

Iowa Council of Foundations

To strengthen and grow philanthropy in iowa

Education

Minneapolis College of Art and Design

Embolden creative leaders to transform society through equity, empathy, & imagination.

Education

Iowa Historical Foundation

Promoting the preservation and the interpretation of the history of the state of iowa.

Arts & Culture

Iowa College Access Network

Empowering Iowans to achieve lifelong success through education, training, and informed decision-making.

Education

Chamber of Commerce Council Bluffs Iowa

Chamber of commerce

—

Independent Insurance Agents of

Membership association for independent insurance agents doing business in the state of iowa

—

United Way of North Central Iowa

Connect and strengthen community resources to inspire change in the lives of all north Iowans.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Arc of East Central Iowa and the most unlike its peers is Cornell College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/31

the rest of the field

94/1,136

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

30 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

30/30

Grantees still filing

24/30

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$3,397,496Philanthropy$875,000Arts & Culture$677,950Health$472,100Education$454,500Environment$220,400Human Services$121,100Recreation & Sports$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Cedar Rapids CommunityIA58.3× affinity25 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Cedar Rapids Community · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · United Fire Group Foundation · The Hall-Perrine Foundation · United Way of East Central Iowa · The Kenneth K Kinsey Family Foundation · Rohde Family Charitable Foundation · GreenState Credit Union · The Slappey Family Foundation · Carleen and Eugene Grandon · John P & Lawrence J Giacoletto Fnd · Mercy Medical Center

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE MCINTYRE FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MARION HISTORICAL SOCIETY.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~21 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 4 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 474590805 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on MARION HISTORICAL SOCIETY, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 21 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 33% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The McIntyre Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The McIntyre Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE MCINTYRE FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

30 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The McIntyre Foundation?

More from the funding graph

THE MCINTYRE FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

30 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The McIntyre Foundation?

More from the funding graph