Skip to content

· Public charity

Creative Visions Foundation

Creating awareness of critical issues and promoting positive action through media and the arts.

$14M
Granted FY2024still arriving
90
Grants FY2024still arriving
19
States reached
$1.4M
Largest
01What it funds
0180% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$20MEmployment$13MHealth$3.4MCommunity Improvement$2.8MHuman Services$1.6MInternational$1.3MEnvironment$1.2MFood & Nutrition$1.1MOther$0
02FY2024 · 90 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 90 grants below total $11,484,381, the rows itemized in this filing. The $14,172,328 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,687,947 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $91k
  • $10k–50k46 grants · $1.1M
  • $50k–250k19 grants · $2.2M
  • $250k+14 grants · $8.2M
$27,388
Median grant
19
States reached
$7.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNBROKEN GENERATION PRODUCTION LLC$1,394,102
WONDERSTRUCK PRODUCTIONS LLC$1,358,000
IMPAKT PARTNERS LLC$883,951
OPTIMIST FILMS LLC$697,951
THE FRED ROSS PROJECT LLC$575,000
LOUISVILLE FILMS$490,000
HG FILMS LLC$454,426
GRANTS OF THE NILE LLC$419,928
CLASSY INC$389,650
HG FILMS LLC$356,255
THE SUMMIT SERIES LLC$328,907
LEOPOLD FILMS LLC$285,000
QUIET EPIDEMIC$275,134
Individual grant recipient$259,490
THE LAST WITCH LLC$238,729
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Youth Passageways: $93k → 8%Working Nation: $999k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
MT
MN
WI
MI
NY
MA
NV
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
TN
NC
DC
HI
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$37M · 73 repeat orgs$16M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against -2% for those funded once.

73 repeat relationships: 36 still active in FY2024, 37 since wound down; 54 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

73
173

Total granted

$37M
$10M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
-2%

Still filing today

8%
7%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesPublic BenefitEnvironmentEmploymentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    THE GOOD ENERGY PROJECT INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $506k · revenue +53% · 43% of their budget
  • TI
    TransCanWork Inc
    2× · 2019–2020 · $273k · revenue +217% · 53% of their budget
  • MI
    METO INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $93k · revenue ×46

Funded once

  • EC
    EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $999k · revenue +409%
  • AP
    AMERICAN PSYCHEDELIC PRACTITIONERS ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2023 · $581k
  • FF
    Female Founder Collective Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $563k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Shebuilds Foundation

To accelerate social, economic, and environmental progress globally by equipping entrepreneurs, innovators, and change makers with the tools to scale their impact

Community Improvement
2
Global Creative Initiative Planet Inc
Arts & Culture
3
For the Wild Collective

For The Wild Collective's mission is to preserve and strengthen the integrity of Earth's natural communities. It is dedicated to protecting land, promoting co-liberation, and sharing intersectional stories challenging human supremacy,…

Environment
4
Moonshot Initiative Inc

Promote gender equity in the film & television industry

Arts & Culture
5
The Conversationalist
—
6
Transparent Collective Inc

Increasing the number of underrepresented founders raising early stage funding

—
7
Indigenous Women Rising Indigeous Women Rising
—
8
Kito Impact Foundation

Kito Impact Foundation works to develop solutions to climate change and loss of biodiversity since 2018.

International
9
Climate Knowledge Collective Inc

Our mission is to preserve and share stories of environmental resilience and innovation, with a focus on feminist knowledge. through in-depth research and the creation of story maps, visualizations, and comprehensive oral history…

Environment
10
Artnoir Inc

ARTNOIR is a global collective and a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization with a mission to celebrate and highlight the work of creatives of color from around the world while catalyzing cultural equity across the arts and culture industries.…

Arts & Culture
11
Mondo Bizarro Productions

Mondo Bizarro Productions has been creating interdisciplinary art and fostering creative partnerships in local, national and international communities for twenty years. Our creative endeavors range from ensemble performances to large-scale…

Arts & Culture
12
Biodiversa Foundation

The conservation of natural and cultural heritage accomplished in two components: 1 Astrolab expo in New York City showcasing wildlife art and 2 beehive project providing bees and associated equipment to the rural community residing within…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Good Energy Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is TransCanWork Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 300 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
9/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Structural Unemployment LLC: $11,129,997 · OtherStructural Unemployment LLCTHE XTR FILM SOCIETY: $3,052,078 · OtherTHE XTR FILM SOCIETYWONDERSTRUCK PRODUCTIONS LLC: $2,431,900 · Other+186 more: $31,509,602 · Other+186 moreEDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION: $999,450 · Human ServicesRestoring Lifeways: $93,000 · Human ServicesINSTITUTE OF BLACK IMAGINATION: $570,275 · Arts & CultureGIVING ART TO MISSOULA: $235,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $15,000 · Arts & CultureFEMALE FOUNDER COLLECTIVE INC: $552,432 · Community ImprovementTHE GOOD ENERGY PROJECT INC: $505,708 · EnvironmentROSEBUD CONTINUUM CORPORATION: $17,871 · EnvironmentTransCanWork Inc: $273,263 · EmploymentREADY TO LAUNCH: $64,446 · EmploymentMETO INC: $93,166 · Education
Other$48,123,577Human Services$1,092,450Arts & Culture$820,275Community Improvement$552,432Environment$523,579Employment$337,709Education$93,166

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE XTR FILM SOCIETY: $3,052,078 over 3y, 74% of budgetEDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION: $999,450 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetTHE GOOD ENERGY PROJECT INC: $505,708 over 2y, 43% of budgetTransCanWork Inc: $273,263 over 2y, 53% of budgetGIVING ART TO MISSOULA: $235,000 over 1y, 91% of budgetMETO INC: $93,166 over 2y, 21% of budgetRestoring Lifeways: $93,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetREADY TO LAUNCH: $64,446 over 1y, 86% of budgetWorld Builders Incubator: $56,002 over 2y, 82% of budgetAMAZON CONSERVATION TEAM: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetROSEBUD CONTINUUM CORPORATION: $17,871 over 1y, 22% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE XTR FILM SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN PSYCHEDELIC PRACTITIONERS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE OF BLACK IMAGINATION ↗
  • Who funds FEMALE FOUNDER COLLECTIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GOOD ENERGY PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds TransCanWork Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors IncNY7.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Creative Visions Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Creative Visions Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Creative Visions Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Creative Visions Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 300 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Creative Visions’ filings →

    More from the funding graph