Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cramer Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$49k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$86kHuman Services$63kCrime & Legal$61kReligion$41kArts & Culture$29kPhilanthropy$26kHealth$8kRecreation & Sports$3k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $21k
$3,981
Median grant
1
States reached
$290k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES$11,000
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA - LAW SCHOOL$10,000
CONGREGATION KENESETH ISRAEL$8,900
COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES$4,500
PHILADELPHIA VIP$4,500
UNITED WAY OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA AND SOUTHERN NJ$3,981
CONGREGATION KENESETH ISRAEL$3,000
THE FREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA$2,000
CONGREGATION KENESETH ISRAEL$536
MIND YOUR BRAIN FOUNDATION$500
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA - THE GAZETTE$100
CONGREGATION KENESETH ISRAEL$40
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $63k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $7k → 22%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $6k → 22%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $6k → 22%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $6k → 22%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $5k → 22%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $5k → 22%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $11k → 22%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $10k → 22%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $7k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$243k · 12 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +77% since the first grant, against -6% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
8

Total granted

$243k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
-6%

Still filing today

67%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyArts & CultureHealthCrime & LegalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH
    9× · 2017–2025 · $63k · revenue +102%
  • PHILADELPHIA VIP INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $28k · revenue +77%
  • COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $26k · revenue +120%

Funded once

  • PE
    PENN ENTERTAINMENT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue -88%
  • JL
    JENKINS LAW LIBRARY
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • RC
    REFORM CONGREGATION KENESETH ISRAEL
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
2
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
3
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
4
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
5
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
6
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
7
Philadelphia Health Partnership
Health
8
Women's Law Project

Women's law project creates a more just and equitable society by advancing the rights and status of all women throughout their lives. to this end, we engage in high-impact litigation, advocacy, and education. the core values of women's law…

Civil Rights
9
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
10
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
11
The Phillips Collection

The phillips collection is the oldest museum of modern and contemporary art in the u.s. in addition to presentation of works from the permanent collection and special exhibitions, the museum maintains active educational, academic,…

Arts & Culture
12
American Philosophical Society

The American Philosophical Society, the oldest learned society in the United States, was founded in 1743 by Benjamin Franklin for the purpose of "promoting useful knowledge." In the 21st century the Society sustains this mission in three…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Free Library of Philadelphia Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Penn Entertainment Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION KENESETH ISRAEL: $39,204 · OtherCONGREGATION KENESETH ISRAELUNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA - LAW SCHOOL: $20,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA -…FREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $10,500 · OtherFREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA…LOUIS B BRANDEIS LAW SOCIETY: $5,000 · OtherLOUIS B BRANDEIS LAW SOCIETY+8 more: $5,885 · Other+8 moreTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $65,600 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERS…JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH: $62,978 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY AND CHIL…PHILADELPHIA VIP INC: $27,526 · Crime & LegalPHILADELPHIA VIP IN…COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES INC: $26,000 · Crime & LegalCOMMUNITY LEGAL SER…UNITED WAY OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY: $25,981 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY…PENN ENTERTAINMENT FOUNDATION: $2,500 · PhilanthropyPENN ENTER…THE BARNES FOUNDATION: $17,500 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $1,300 · Arts & CultureTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $7,000 · HealthMind Your Brain Foundation: $500 · Health
Other$80,589Education$65,600Human Services$62,978Crime & Legal$53,526Philanthropy$28,481Arts & Culture$18,800Health$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $65,600 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH: $62,978 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPHILADELPHIA VIP INC: $27,526 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES INC: $26,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY: $25,981 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BARNES FOUNDATION: $17,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $10,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPENN ENTERTAINMENT FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $1,300 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH PUBLICATION SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS OF PHILADELPHIA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMind Your Brain Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA VIP INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY ↗
  • Who funds THE BARNES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds PENN ENTERTAINMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH PUBLICATION SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds Mind Your Brain Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cramer Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cramer Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Cramer Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Cramer Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cramer Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph