Skip to content

· Private foundation

Craig and Christine Hughes Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$193k
Granted FY2024still arriving
36
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$270kEducation$118kHousing & Shelter$115kReligion$55kYouth Development$37kHealth$23kInternational$23kArts & Culture$14kOther$0
02FY2024 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k27 grants · $63k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $130k
$4,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
A New Leaf$30,000
St Vincent de Paul$20,000
Save The Family$20,000
Forest Highlands Foundation$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Boys Hope Girls Hope$10,000
OLPH$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Phoenix Dream Center$10,000
Opportunity Intl$5,000
OLPH St Vincent$5,000
Habitat for Humanity$5,000
Andre House$5,000
Opportunity International$5,000
Andre House$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Charity Water: $3k → 17%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
CA
AZ
TN
DC
OK
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$489k · 26 repeat orgs$255k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
38

Total granted

$489k
$174k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+20%

Still filing today

62%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $81k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationEnvironmentFood & NutritionArts & CultureAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CENTRAL ARIZONA
    3× · 2017–2019 · $80k · revenue +33%
  • DC
    DIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX
    4× · 2018–2024 · $33k · revenue +98%
  • OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US
    2× · 2023–2024 · $15k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • PC
    PHOENIX COLLEGIATE ACADEMY INC
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • ST
    SAVE THE FAMILY FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA
    one grant, 2017 · $33k · revenue +1%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
2
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
3
Arizona Food Bank Network

Develop solutions to end hunger through food banking, public policy and innovation.

Food & Nutrition
4
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
5
Center for the Future of Arizona

Bringing arizonans together to create a stronger and brighter future for our state.

Community Improvement
6
Vitalyst Health Foundation

To connect, support and inform efforts to improve the health of individuals and communities in arizona.

Health
7
Pro-Choice Arizona

Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…

Health
8
American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona

The american civil liberties union of arizona is the state's premier guardian of liberty working through the arizona legislature and communities statewide to defend and preserve individual rights and freedoms guaranteed to all by the…

—
9
Child Crisis Arizona

To provide children and youth in arizona a safe environment, free from abuse and neglect, by creating strong and successful families.

Crime & Legal
10
Impact of Southern Arizona

Impact of southern arizona is a private non-profit volunteer based organization which empowers southern arizonans with the resources required to pursue a stabilized and enhanced quality of life.

Community Improvement
11
Education Forward Arizona

To advocate for and act on education improvements that advance the quality of life for all arizonans.

—
12
Honorhealth

Honorhealth's mission is to improve the health and well-being of those we serve.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is A New Leaf; the most unlike its peers is Missions for Orphans Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/40
Grantees still filing
29/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CENTRAL ARIZONA: $80,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY CENTRAL ARIZONASave the Family: $60,000 · OtherSave the FamilyPHOENIX COLLEGIATE ACADEMY INC: $50,000 · OtherPHOENIX COLLEGIATE ACADEMY INCHope Ignites Phoenix: $35,000 · OtherHope Ignites PhoenixOur Lady of Clear Creek Abbey: $20,000 · OtherAndre House: $20,000 · Other+59 more: $199,926 · Other+59 moreHOMEWARD BOUND: $132,500 · Housing & ShelterHOMEWARD BOUNDSAVE THE FAMILY FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA: $32,500 · Housing & ShelterSAVE THE FAMILY FOUNDATIO…A NEW LEAF: $30,000 · HealthLIFE CHOICES WOMEN'S CLINIC: $2,500 · HealthCUREPSP INC: $1,750 · HealthPhoenix Children's Hospital Foundation: $1,500 · Health+1 more: $750 · HealthDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX: $33,000 · ReligionCatholic Community Foundation for the Diocese of Phoenix: $2,500 · ReligionOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US: $15,000 · InternationalMISSIONS FOR ORPHANS INC: $7,558 · InternationalForest Highlands Foundation: $11,000 · PhilanthropyVILLA MONTESSORI INC: $7,000 · EducationMONTESSORI ACADEMY INC: $2,000 · EducationUNITED STATES BREASTFEEDING COMMITTEE INC: $1,000 · EducationCOSANTI FOUNDATION: $500 · Education
Other$464,926Housing & Shelter$165,000Health$36,500Religion$35,500International$22,558Philanthropy$11,000Education$10,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOMEWARD BOUND: $132,500 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY CENTRAL ARIZONA: $80,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPHOENIX COLLEGIATE ACADEMY INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetHope Ignites Phoenix: $35,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX: $33,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE THE FAMILY FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA: $32,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetA NEW LEAF: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetForest Highlands Foundation: $11,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetMISSIONS FOR ORPHANS INC: $7,558 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetVILLA MONTESSORI INC: $7,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFORTISSIMO: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLost Our Home Pet Foundation: $3,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPHOENIX ART MUSEUM: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCatholic Community Foundation for the Diocese of Phoenix: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFE CHOICES WOMEN'S CLINIC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTEMPE COMMUNITY COUNCIL INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCLIMATE JUSTICE ALLIANCE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMONTESSORI ACADEMY INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCUREPSP INC: $1,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARIZONA ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPhoenix Children's Hospital Foundation: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES BREASTFEEDING COMMITTEE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTLINK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget1N10 INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORCHARD COMMUNITY LEARNING SERVICE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Inc: $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA-SONORA DESERT MUSEUM: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHospice of the Valley: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget350ORG: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDESERT BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAGS TO RICHES ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOSANTI FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOMEWARD BOUND ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CENTRAL ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds PHOENIX COLLEGIATE ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds Hope Ignites Phoenix ↗
  • Who funds DIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX ↗
  • Who funds SAVE THE FAMILY FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds A NEW LEAF ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US ↗
  • Who funds Forest Highlands Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MISSIONS FOR ORPHANS INC ↗
  • Who funds VILLA MONTESSORI INC ↗
  • Who funds FORTISSIMO ↗
  • Who funds Lost Our Home Pet Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PHOENIX ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds CHARITY GLOBAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ21.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Phoenix Community Development and Investment Corporation · American Express Foundation · Thunderbirds Charities · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · Valley of the Sun United Way · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · The Yelp Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Craig and Christine Hughes Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Craig and Christine Hughes Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Craig and Christine Hughes Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Craig and Christine Hughes Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 81 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Craig and Christine Hughes Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph