Skip to content

· Private foundation

Courtenay Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$68k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$138kEducation$89kHuman Services$77kPublic Benefit$24kPhilanthropy$23kArts & Culture$12kYouth Development$12kRecreation & Sports$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$307k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WEST END SCHOOL$6,000
THE HEALING PLACE$6,000
FAIR$5,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING$5,000
HOME OF THE INNOCENTS$5,000
THE LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE$4,750
HOSPARUS INC$4,500
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF INDIANA$4,250
YMCA OF GREATER LOUISVILLE$4,000
THE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES$3,500
METRO UNITED WAY$3,000
FUND FOR THE ARTS$2,000
THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION$2,000
CENTRE COLLEGE$2,000
THE MORTON CENTER$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $105k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HOSPARUS INC: $5k → 15%HOSPARUS INC: $5k → 15%HOSPARUS INC: $5k → 15%HOSPARUS INC: $5k → 15%YMCA OF GREATER LOUISVILLE: $4k → 15%HOSPARUS INC: $4k → 15%YMCA OF GREATER LOUISVILLE: $4k → 15%YMCA OF GREATER LOUISVILLE: $4k → 15%YMCA OF GREATER LOUISVILLE: $4k → 15%YMCA OF GREATER LOUISVILLE: $4k → 15%HOSPARUS INC: $4k → 15%YMCA OF GREATER LOUISVILLE: $3k → 15%HOSPARUS INC: $3k → 15%YMCA OF GREATER LOUISVILLE: $2k → 15%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $5k → 15%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $5k → 15%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $5k → 15%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $5k → 15%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $5k → 15%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $4k → 15%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $3k → 15%THE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES: $4k → 15%THE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES: $4k → 15%THE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES: $4k → 15%THE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES: $4k → 15%THE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES: $3k → 15%THE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES: $3k → 15%THE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
NY
MA
IN
CT
CA
KY
VA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$379k · 19 repeat orgs$1k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
2

Total granted

$379k
$1k

Still filing today

79%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    THE HEALING PLACE INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $37k · revenue +14%
  • WE
    West End School Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $37k · revenue +15%
  • TH
    THE HOME OF THE INNOCENTS INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $32k · revenue +201%

Funded once

  • HF
    HIGH FRONTIER
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • HC
    HARVARD COLLEGE FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $200
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
4
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
7
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
8
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
9
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
10
Mcphs University

Mcphs university prepares students for careers in health care through teaching, scholarship, research, professional service and community engagement.

Education
11
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
12
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc; the most unlike its peers is West End School Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE HEALING PLACE INC: $37,000 · OtherTHE HEALING PLACE INCFAIR: $28,400 · OtherFAIRPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF INDIANA AND KENTUCKY INC: $26,500 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF INDIANA AND KENTUCKY …MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING: $25,500 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERINGTHE MORTON CENTER INC: $15,750 · OtherTHE MORTON CENTER INCTHE LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $15,500 · OtherTHE LIBRARY FOUNDATION+3 more: $6,200 · OtherTHE HOME OF THE INNOCENTS INC: $31,500 · Human ServicesTHE HOME OF THE INNOCENTS INCHOSPARUS INC HOSPARUS HEALTH: $28,000 · Human ServicesHOSPARUS INC HOSPARUS HEALTHthe Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Louisville Inc: $24,250 · Human Servicesthe Young Men's Christian Ass…THE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES INC: $21,000 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMI…West End School Inc: $36,500 · EducationWest End School IncCENTRE COLLEGE: $12,500 · EducationCENTRE COLLEGEBROOKS SCHOOL: $11,000 · EducationBROOKS SCHOOLSOUTH KENT SCHOOL CORPORATION: $11,000 · EducationSOUTH KENT SCHOOL CO…+1 more: $2,000 · EducationLeadership Institute: $23,500 · Public BenefitMETRO UNITED WAY INC: $22,500 · PhilanthropyCAMP PASQUANEY: $12,000 · Recreation & SportsONAWAY CAMP TRUST: $3,000 · Recreation & SportsFUND FOR THE ARTS INC: $12,400 · Arts & Culture
Other$154,850Human Services$104,750Education$73,000Public Benefit$23,500Philanthropy$22,500Recreation & Sports$15,000Arts & Culture$12,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE HEALING PLACE INC: $37,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetWest End School Inc: $36,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetTHE HOME OF THE INNOCENTS INC: $31,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPARUS INC HOSPARUS HEALTH: $28,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF INDIANA AND KENTUCKY INC: $26,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetthe Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Louisville Inc: $24,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute: $23,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMETRO UNITED WAY INC: $22,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES INC: $21,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MORTON CENTER INC: $15,750 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetCENTRE COLLEGE: $12,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFUND FOR THE ARTS INC: $12,400 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP PASQUANEY: $12,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBROOKS SCHOOL: $11,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH KENT SCHOOL CORPORATION: $11,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGILDA'S CLUB KENTUCKIANA INC: $5,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetONAWAY CAMP TRUST: $3,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE HEALING PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds West End School Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE HOME OF THE INNOCENTS INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSPARUS INC HOSPARUS HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF INDIANA AND KENTUCKY INC ↗
  • Who funds the Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Louisville Inc ↗
  • Who funds Leadership Institute ↗
  • Who funds METRO UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MORTON CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds FUND FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP PASQUANEY ↗
  • Who funds BROOKS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH KENT SCHOOL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds GILDA'S CLUB KENTUCKIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds ONAWAY CAMP TRUST ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Gheens Foundation IncKY22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Gheens Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Depository Inc · Brown-Forman Foundation · Norton Healthcare Inc · Republic Bank Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · Lift a Life Foundation Inc · Sociable Weaver Foundation Inc · Kosair Charities Committee Inc · The Whas Crusade for Children Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc · Baird Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Courtenay Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Courtenay Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • South Kent School Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Courtenay’s filings →

More from the funding graph