· Public charity
Council of Medical Specialty Societies
Supporting and strengthening member societies to address future challenges.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 11 grants below total $550,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $9,506,494 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $8,956,494 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| American Gastroenterological Association Institute Inc | $50,000 |
| American Urological Association Education and Research Inc | $50,000 |
| Society for Vascular Surgery | $50,000 |
| American Society of Nephrology | $50,000 |
| American Epilepsy Society | $50,000 |
| American College of CHEST Physicians | $50,000 |
| American College of Emergency Physicians | $50,000 |
| Society of Critical Care Medicine | $50,000 |
| American Society for Clinical Pathology | $50,000 |
| American Academy of Dermatology | $50,000 |
| College of American Pathologists | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 81% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
24 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ACAMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY INC2× · 2022–2023 · $2.2M · revenue +30%
- ASAMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY INC2× · 2022–2023 · $1.8M · revenue +9%
- ACAMERICAN COLLEGE OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE3× · 2021–2023 · $1.5M · revenue +45%
Funded once
- ACACCREDITATION COUNCIL FOR GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATIONone grant, 2021 · $84k · revenue +23%
- TATHE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ALLERGY ASTHMAone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +11%
- ATAmerican Thoracic Society Incone grant, 2021 · $21k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Advancing medicine through excellence in the science, education and professional practice of medical physics. the mission is carried out through driving scientific and clinical innovation in medical physics to improve human health,…
The purpose of american gastroenterological association, inc. is to promote the common business interests of its members by promoting the image of the industry as a whole; to serve as a central, unified voice for the specialty of…
The american college of radiology (acr) is organized to advance radiology science, practice and access, improve quality and safety, provide continuing education for radiology and allied professionals, and achieve better outcomes through…
Advance pharmacy education, research, scholarship, practice and service, in partnership with members and stakeholders, to improve health for all.
American association of medical society executives (aamse) is committed to educating and supporting medical society professionals to advance the profession of medical society management, medical societies, and the physicians they serve.
The mission of the american society for clinical pathology is to provide excellence in education, certification and advocacy on behalf of patients, pathologists and medical laboratory professionals.
Aarc's mission is to be the foremost professional association promoting respiratory therapists. the aarc advances professional excellence and science in the practice of repiratory therapy, serving the professional, patients, caregivers and…
Aacom leads and advocates for the osteopathic medical education community to improve the health of the public. aacom represents and advances the continuum of medical education by: supporting our member institutions as they educate the…
The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.
To enhance the quality and effectiveness of health care by fostering excellence and professionalism in the practice of medicine
Our mission is to enhance the ability of our members to provide world class care to patients with digestive disorders and advance the profession through excellence and innovation based upon the pillars of patient care, education,…
Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American College of Chest Physicians and the most unlike its peers is American Society of Nephrology. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 58 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE ↗
- Who funds American College of Cardiology Foundation ↗
- Who funds American Society of Nephrology ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds College of American Pathologists ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION EDUCATION AND RESEARCH INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ANESTHESIOLOGISTS ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN EPILEPSY SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds American College of Chest Physicians ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ACADEMY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY INC ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY FOR VASCULAR SURGERY ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN COLLEGE OF EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN GASTROENTEROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ACCREDITATION COUNCIL FOR GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ALLERGY ASTHMA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Council of Medical Specialty Societies funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- American Gastroenterological Association Institute — 3% of income from government
- American Urological Association Education and Research Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.