Skip to content
Cornelius L L Heck Schp Fd at a glance

· Private foundation

Cornelius L L Heck Schp Fd

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$85k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,684
Median grant
1
States reached
$234k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SLIPPERY ROCK UNIVERSITY$5,000
BUTLER COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE$2,000
DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY$1,684
Individual grant recipient$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$1,000
WESTMINSTER COLLEGE$135
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
OH
PA
CA
UT
VA
MD
KS
LA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$62k · 12 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
26

Total granted

$62k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+8%

Still filing today

50%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    4× · 2019–2025 · $4k · revenue +28%
  • DU
    DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT
    3× · 2020–2025 · $3k · revenue +23%
  • PP
    POINT PARK UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2019–2023 · $2k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • I
    IUP
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • BC
    BUTLER COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
  • PW
    PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN UNIVERSITY EDINBOR
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

—
2
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
3
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
4
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
5
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
6
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
7
Saint John's University

To foster the vitality of community through learning and the pursuit of wisdom.

—
8
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
9
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
10
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
11
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
12
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Pittsburgh; the most unlike its peers is University of Southern California. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BUTLER COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $17,764 · OtherBUTLER COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGEIndividual grant recipient: $11,607 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSLIPPERY ROCK UNIVERSITY: $11,300 · OtherSLIPPERY ROCK UNIVERSITYINDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PA: $4,220 · OtherINDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PACLARION UNIVERSITY: $2,500 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $2,500 · Other+17 more: $15,012 · Other+17 moreUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $3,600 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGHDUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT: $3,184 · EducationDUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE…LA ROCHE UNIVERSITY: $1,900 · EducationLA ROCHE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $1,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CAL…WESTMINSTER COLLEGE: $1,135 · EducationWESTMINSTER COLLEGESAINT FRANCIS UNIVERSITY: $1,100 · EducationSAINT FRANCIS UNIVERSITYTHE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER: $1,000 · EducationCHATHAM UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · EducationCARLOW UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · EducationTHIEL COLLEGE: $1,000 · Education+7 more: $3,800 · Education+7 more
Other$64,903Education$20,219

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $3,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT: $3,184 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLA ROCHE UNIVERSITY: $1,900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPOINT PARK UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWESTMINSTER COLLEGE: $1,135 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT FRANCIS UNIVERSITY: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHATHAM UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARLOW UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHIEL COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGANNON UNIVERSITY: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JOHN'S COLLEGE: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGENEVA COLLEGE: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSETON HILL UNIVERSITY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGROVE CITY COLLEGE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTMINSTER UNIVERSITY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT ↗
  • Who funds LA ROCHE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds POINT PARK UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WESTMINSTER COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SAINT FRANCIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER ↗
  • Who funds CHATHAM UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CARLOW UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THIEL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds GANNON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ST JOHN'S COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds GENEVA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SETON HILL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GROVE CITY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds LIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTMINSTER UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cornelius L L Heck Schp Fd funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cornelius L L Heck Schp Fd. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cornelius L L Heck Schp Fd’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home